Machine learning-enabled calibration of river routing model parameters

被引:4
作者
Zhao, Ying [1 ]
Chadha, Mayank [2 ]
Olsen, Nicholas [3 ]
Yeates, Elissa [3 ]
Turner, Josh [4 ]
Gugaratshan, Guga [4 ]
Qian, Guofeng [2 ]
Todd, Michael D. [2 ]
Hu, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Dearborn, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Dearborn, MI 48128 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] US Army Corps Engineers, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, Vicksburg, MS USA
[4] Hottinger Bruel & Kjaer Solut LLC, Southfield, MI 48076 USA
关键词
hydrological model; machine learning; model calibration; RAPID; rivers streamflow prediction; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MUSKINGUM; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2023.030
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Streamflow prediction of rivers is crucial for making decisions in watershed and inland waterways management. The US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) uses a river routing model called RAPID to predict water discharges for thousands of rivers in the network for watershed and inland waterways management. However, the calibration of hydrological streamflow parameters in RAPID is time-consuming and requires streamflow measurement data which may not be available for some ungauged locations. In this study, we aim to address the calibration aspect of the RAPID model by exploring machine learning (ML)-based methods to facilitate efficient calibration of hydrological model parameters without the need for streamflow measurements. Various ML models are constructed and compared to learn a relationship between hydrological model parameters and various river parameters, such as length, slope, catchment size, percentage of vegetation, and elevation contours. The studied ML models include Gaussian process regression, Gaussian mixture copula, Random Forest, and XGBoost. This study has shown that ML models that are carefully constructed by considering causal and sensitive input features offer a potential approach that not only obtains calibrated hydrological model parameters with reasonable accuracy but also bypasses the current calibration challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:1799 / 1821
页数:23
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   A random forest guided tour [J].
Biau, Gerard ;
Scornet, Erwan .
TEST, 2016, 25 (02) :197-227
[2]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[3]   Deep Feature Learning for Medical Image Analysis with Convolutional Autoencoder Neural Network [J].
Chen, Min ;
Shi, Xiaobo ;
Zhang, Yin ;
Wu, Di ;
Guizani, Mohsen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIG DATA, 2021, 7 (04) :750-758
[4]  
Chen SS, 1998, INT CONF ACOUST SPEE, P645, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.1998.675347
[5]   XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System [J].
Chen, Tianqi ;
Guestrin, Carlos .
KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, :785-794
[6]   Applying Particle Swarm Optimization to Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model [J].
Chu, Hone-Jay ;
Chang, Liang-Cheng .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (09) :1024-1027
[7]  
Cunge J. A., 1969, J. Hydraul. Res., V7, P205, DOI [10.1080/00221686909500264, DOI 10.1080/00221686909500264]
[8]   Parameter estimation for Muskingum models [J].
Das, A .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (02) :140-147
[9]   Quantification of the upstream-to-downstream influence in the Muskingum method and implications for speedup in parallel computations of river flow [J].
David, Cedric H. ;
Yang, Zong-Liang ;
Famiglietti, James S. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2013, 49 (05) :2783-2800
[10]   River Network Routing on the NHDPlus Dataset [J].
David, Cedric H. ;
Maidment, David R. ;
Niu, Guo-Yue ;
Yang, Zong-Liang ;
Habets, Florence ;
Eijkhout, Victor .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2011, 12 (05) :913-934