Life Cycle Assessment for Geopolymer Concrete Bricks Using Brown Coal Fly Ash

被引:8
作者
Zhang, Jingxuan [1 ]
Fernando, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Law, David W. [1 ]
Gunasekara, Chamila [1 ]
Setunge, Sujeeva [1 ]
Sandanayake, Malindu [3 ]
Zhang, Guomin [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Univ Peradeniya, Fac Engn, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
[3] Victoria Univ, Coll Sports Hlth & Engn, Footscray, Vic 3011, Australia
关键词
life cycle assessment; brown coal fly ash; impact assessment; cost-benefit analysis; WASTE; CONSTRUCTION; EMISSIONS; MIXTURES; CLIMATE; CEMENTS;
D O I
10.3390/su15097718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Traditionally, the construction industry has predominantly used Portland cement (PC) to manufacture bricks, as it is one of the most-commonly available building materials. However, the employment of waste industrial material for brick production can lead to a significant improvement in terms of sustainability within the construction sector. Geopolymer bricks made from brown coal fly ash, a promising industrial waste by-product, serve as a potential alternative. Conducting a life cycle assessment (LCA), this study thoroughly evaluated the entire manufacturing process's environmental impact, from source material acquisition and transportation to brick manufacturing, distribution, usage, and end-of-life, for brown coal bricks as compared to PC bricks. The LCA of the brown coal bricks revealed that their primary environmental impacts stemmed from the raw material manufacturing and usage, while exhibiting substantial reductions in ozone depletion, water depletion, and metal depletion. These findings highlighted the environmental advantages of the brown coal bricks and their potential to revolutionize sustainable construction practices.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Abdulkareem M., 2019, SARDINIA
[2]   Environmental and economic perspective of waste-derived activators on alkali-activated mortars [J].
Abdulkareem, Mariam ;
Havukainen, Jouni ;
Nuortila-Jokinen, Jutta ;
Horttanainen, Mika .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 280
[3]  
Adak S., 2016, INT J ENV AGR BIOTEC, V1, P238565, DOI [10.22161/ijeab/1.3.34, DOI 10.22161/IJEAB/1.3.34]
[4]   LCA Case Study to LED Outdoor Luminaries as a Circular Economy Solution to Local Scale [J].
Adolfo Lozano-Miralles, Jose ;
Jesus Hermoso-Orzaez, Manuel ;
Gago-Calderon, Alfonso ;
Brito, Paulo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
[5]  
AEU, 2020, AUSTR ENERGY UPDATE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO14040 - Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, DOI DOI 10.3403/30151316.
[7]   Update on air pollution control strategies for coal-fired power plants [J].
Asif, Zunaira ;
Chen, Zhi ;
Wang, Hui ;
Zhu, Yinyin .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2022, 24 (08) :2329-2347
[8]  
Association W.C, 2020, COAL EL
[9]   Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack [J].
Bakharev, T .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2005, 35 (04) :658-670
[10]   Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits [J].
Bare, Jane C. ;
Hofstetter, Patrick ;
Pennington, David W. ;
de Haes, Helias A. Udo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (06) :319-326