Democratic transition and party polarization: A fuzzy regression discontinuity design approach

被引:0
作者
Ademi, Ubeydullah [1 ]
Kimya, Firat [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Polit, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Polit, Gibson Hall 183,1540 Jefferson Pk Ave, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
democratic transition; party polarization; right-left issue dimension; fuzzy regression discontinuity design; political parties; CENTRIFUGAL INCENTIVES; SYSTEM POLARIZATION; POLITICS; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; CONSEQUENCES; CENTRIPETAL; REVOLUTIONS; MATTERS; GERMANY;
D O I
10.1177/13540688231171689
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
How does democratic transition affect party polarization? While previous literature on party politics in post-transition environments describes a fragmented political system marked by multi-partism and the rise of weakly institutionalized parties, party polarization in young democracies is underexplored. We argue that democratic transition reduces party polarization by introducing a new set of parties which have not consolidated their issue positions yet. The ambiguity of party positions makes ideological attributes less salient and renders a less polarized party politics. To assess the impact of the party polarization in young democracies, we employ a fuzzy regression discontinuity design (RDD). We use the Manifesto Project data on right-left positions of parties from 58 countries to measure party polarization and the Varieties of Democracy (V-DEM) data on regime transition to identify democratic transitions. Our findings suggest that party polarization on right-left issue position decreases on average, following the democratic transition.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 749
页数:14
相关论文
共 112 条
[21]   Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter [J].
Curini, Luigi ;
Hino, Airo .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (02) :460-473
[22]   The quantity and the quality of party systems - Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences [J].
Dalton, Russell J. .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2008, 41 (07) :899-920
[23]   Thinking about hybrid regimes [J].
Diamond, L .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2002, 13 (02) :21-35
[24]  
Diamond L, 2010, J DEMOCR, V21, P93
[25]   Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized? [J].
DiMaggio, P ;
Evans, J ;
Bryson, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1996, 102 (03) :690-755
[26]  
Djuve VL., 2022, V DEM CODEBOOK V12
[27]  
Dunning T., 2012, Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139084444
[28]   Issues versus Affect: How Do Elite and Mass Polarization Compare? [J].
Enders, Adam M. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2021, 83 (04) :1872-1877
[29]   Democratic transitions [J].
Epstein, David L. ;
Bates, Robert ;
Goldstone, Jack ;
Kristensen, Ida ;
O'Halloran, Sharyn .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 50 (03) :551-569
[30]   The variance matters: How party systems represent the preferences of voters [J].
Ezrow, Lawrence .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2007, 69 (01) :182-192