Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Grade 3 Open Fractures: A Retrospective Comparison of Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin Versus Cefazolin Plus Gentamicin

被引:0
作者
Shifko, Carlee R. [1 ,2 ]
Jenniches, Daniel [1 ]
Holmberg, Kyle [1 ]
Andreini, Derek [1 ]
Philp, Allan [1 ]
Altman, Daniel T. [1 ]
Bremmer, Derek [1 ]
机构
[1] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Pharm, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
关键词
antibiotic prophylaxis; Gustilo-Anderson; open fracture; orthopedic trauma; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2023.137
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Because of the established path of bacterial entry and contamination-associated mechanisms, grade 3 open orthopedic fractures represent a substantial infection risk. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guidelines recommended covering Staphylococcus aureus and adding aminoglycoside gram-negative coverage. Local institutional guidelines rely on ceftriaxone for gram negative coverage and add methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus coverage with vancomycin.Patients and Methods: The electronic health records of adults admitted for a grade 3 open fracture between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received cefazolin and gentamicin (CZ+GM) or ceftriaxone and vancomycin (CRO+VA) as prophylaxis were included. We recorded the rate of a composite treatment failure outcome of receipt of antibiotic agents, infection-related hospitalization, or subsequent debridement for injury-site skin and soft tissue infection or osteomyelitis. The presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was also evaluated.Results: There were 65 patients included in the CZ+GM group and 53 patients in the CRO+VA group. Patients in the CZ+GM group were younger (mean 42.6 compared with 50.6 years; p = 0.02). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between groups' demographics, mechanism and site of injury, timeline of care, or surgical interventions. More patients in the CZ+GM arm met the composite treatment failure outcome, but it was not statistically significant (45% vs. 32%; p = 0.2). There were similar rates of treatment failure at 30 days (21% vs. 26%; p = 0.5) and for only osteomyelitis (8% vs. 9%; p = 1).Conclusions: The trend in numerically lower treatment failure rates in the CRO+VA group across outcomes provides sufficient evidence to continue the current local recommendations. Given our sample size, type 2 error may have occurred, and studies with greater power should analyze this question.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Barton Cassie A, 2012, Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, V2, P57, DOI 10.4103/2229-5151.97268
[2]   Surgical Infection Society Guidelines: 2022 Updated Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Open Extremity Fractures [J].
Buckman, Sara A. ;
Forrester, Joseph D. ;
Bessoff, Kovi E. ;
Parli, Sara E. ;
Evans, Heather L. ;
Huston, Jared M. .
SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2022, 23 (09) :817-828
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019, Emerging infections program, healthcare-associated infections-community interface surveillance report, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI)
[4]   ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OPEN FRACTURES A Systematic Survey of Current Practice and Recommendations [J].
Chang, Yaping ;
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Zhu, Kan Lun ;
Mirza, Reza Donald ;
Ren, Melody ;
Kennedy, Sean Alexander ;
Negm, Ahmed ;
Bhatnagar, Neera ;
Naji, Faysal N. ;
Milovanovic, Lazar ;
Fei, Yutong ;
Agarwal, Arnav ;
Kamran, Rakhshan ;
Cho, Sung Min ;
Schandelmaier, Stefan ;
Wang, Li ;
Jin, Lin ;
Hu, Shiyun ;
Zhao, Yanping ;
Lopes, Luciane Cruz ;
Wang, Mei ;
Petrisor, Brad ;
Ristevski, Bill ;
Siemieniuk, Reed A. C. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JBJS REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (02)
[5]   EFFECTS OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITH OPEN FRACTURE OF THE EXTREMITIES [J].
Chang, Yaping ;
Kennedy, Sean Alexander ;
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Lopes, Luciane Cruz ;
Bergamaschi, Cristiane de Cassia ;
Oliveira e Silva, Maria Carolina de ;
Bhatnagar, Neera ;
Mousavi, S. Mohsen ;
Khurshid, Saqib ;
Petrisor, Brad ;
Ren, Melody ;
Sodhi, Sukhmani K. ;
Mirza, Reza Donald ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JBJS REVIEWS, 2015, 3 (06) :1-12
[6]   Open Tibia Fractures: Timely Debridement Leaves Injury Severity as the Only Determinant of Poor Outcome [J].
Enninghorst, Natalie ;
McDougall, Debra ;
Hunt, Joshua J. ;
Balogh, Zsolt J. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (02) :352-356
[7]   East Practice Management Guidelines Work Group: Update to Practice Management Guidelines for Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Open Fractures [J].
Hoff, William S. ;
Bonadies, John A. ;
Cachecho, Riad ;
Dorlac, Warren C. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (03) :751-753
[8]  
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group, 2012, KIDNEY INT SUPPL, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1038/KISUP.2012.1, 10.1038/kisup.2012.1, 10.1038/kisup.2012.7, DOI 10.1038/KISUP.2012.2]
[9]  
Lack WD, 2015, J ORTHOP TRAUMA, V29, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.mporth.2014.12.008, 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000262]
[10]   Timing of Wound Closure in Open Fractures Based on Cultures Obtained After Debridement [J].
Lenarz, Christopher J. ;
Watson, J. Tracy ;
Moed, Berton R. ;
Israel, Heidi ;
Mullen, J. Daniel ;
MacDonald, James B. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (10) :1921-1926