A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box

被引:20
作者
Lee, Tammy [1 ,2 ]
Natalwala, Jay [1 ]
Chapple, Vincent [1 ]
Liu, Yanhe [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Joondalup Private Hosp, Fertil North, Suite 30,Level 2,60 Shenton Ave, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[3] Bond Univ, Fac Hlth Sci & Med, Robina, Qld, Australia
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
embryo selection; time-lapse videography; artificial intelligence; black-box; glass-box; interpretability; subjectivity; machine learning; deep learning; explainability; FETAL HEART PREGNANCY; TIME-LAPSE INCUBATION; PREDICTIVE TOOL; STATIC IMAGES; IMPLANTATION; MODEL; MORPHOKINETICS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dead254
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
With the exponential growth of computing power and accumulation of embryo image data in recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) is starting to be utilized in embryo selection in IVF. Amongst different AI technologies, machine learning (ML) has the potential to reduce operator-related subjectivity in embryo selection while saving labor time on this task. However, as modern deep learning (DL) techniques, a subcategory of ML, are increasingly used, its integrated black-box attracts growing concern owing to the well-recognized issues regarding lack of interpretability. Currently, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials to confirm the effectiveness of such black-box models. Recently, emerging evidence has shown underperformance of black-box models compared to the more interpretable traditional ML models in embryo selection. Meanwhile, glass-box AI, such as interpretable ML, is being increasingly promoted across a wide range of fields and is supported by its ethical advantages and technical feasibility. In this review, we propose a novel classification system for traditional and AI-driven systems from an embryology standpoint, defining different morphology-based selection approaches with an emphasis on subjectivity, explainability, and interpretability. Graphical Abstract A proposed classification system for artificial intelligence embryo selection models with different subjectivity, interpretability, and explainability.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Interpretable, not black-box, artificial intelligence should be used for embryo selection [J].
Afnan, Michael Anis Mihdi ;
Liu, Yanhe ;
Conitzer, Vincent ;
Rudin, Cynthia ;
Mishra, Abhishek ;
Savulescu, Julian ;
Afnan, Masoud .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2021, 2021 (04)
[2]  
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, 2011, Hum Reprod, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der037
[3]   A comparison of 12 machine learning models developed to predict ploidy, using a morphokinetic meta-dataset of 8147 embryos [J].
Bamford, Thomas ;
Easter, Christina ;
Montgomery, Sue ;
Smith, Rachel ;
Dhillon-Smith, Rima K. ;
Barrie, Amy ;
Campbell, Alison ;
Coomarasamy, Arri .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (04) :569-581
[4]   Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms [J].
Barrie, Amy ;
Homburg, Roy ;
McDowell, Garry ;
Brown, Jeremy ;
Kingsland, Charles ;
Troup, Stephen .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (03) :613-621
[5]   Spontaneous collapse as a prognostic marker for human blastocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bickendorf, Kate ;
Qi, Fang ;
Peirce, Kelli ;
Natalwala, Jay ;
Chapple, Vincent ;
Liu, Yanhe .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (10) :1891-1900
[6]   Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for arti ficial neural networks: an arti ficial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential [J].
Bori, Lorena ;
Paya, Elena ;
Alegre, Lucia ;
Viloria, Thamara Alexandra ;
Remohi, Jose Alejandro ;
Naranjo, Valery ;
Meseguer, Marcos .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (06) :1232-1241
[7]   Consistency and objectivity of automated embryo assessments using deep neural networks [J].
Bormann, Charles L. ;
Thirumalaraju, Prudhvi ;
Kanakasabapathy, Manoj Kumar ;
Kandula, Hemanth ;
Souter, Irene ;
Dimitriadis, Irene ;
Gupta, Raghav ;
Pooniwala, Rohan ;
Shafiee, Hadi .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (04) :781-+
[8]   Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex? [J].
Bronet, Fernando ;
Nogales, Maria-Carmen ;
Martinez, Eva ;
Ariza, Marta ;
Rubio, Carmen ;
Garcia-Velasco, Juan-Antonio ;
Meseguer, Marcos .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (02) :396-401
[9]   Deep learning as a predictive tool for fetal heart pregnancy following time-lapse incubation and blastocyst transfer [J].
Chavez-Badiola, A. ;
Mendizabal-Ruiz, G. ;
Flores-Saiffe Farias, A. ;
Garcia-Sanchez, R. ;
Drakeley, Andrew J. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (02) :482-482
[10]   Embryo Ranking Intelligent Classification Algorithm (ERICA): artificial intelligence clinical assistant predicting embryo ploidy and implantation [J].
Chavez-Badiola, Alejandro ;
Flores-Saiffe-Farias, Adolfo ;
Mendizabal-Ruiz, Gerardo ;
Drakeley, Andrew J. ;
Cohen, Jacques .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 41 (04) :585-593