Assessment of residual geometrical errors of clinical target volumes and their impact on dose accumulation for head and neck radiotherapy

被引:5
作者
Siang, Kelvin Ng Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Oldehinkel, Edwin [1 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
Wagenaar, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Holland Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Med Phys & Informat, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Dept Radiotherapy Med Phys & Instrumentat, Postbus 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Proton therapy; Clinical target volume; Robustness optimization; Margins; Tumor control probability; DEFORMABLE IMAGE REGISTRATION; MODULATED PROTON THERAPY; MINIMAX ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; OROPHARYNGEAL CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; PROBABILITY; MARGINS; UNCERTAINTIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109856
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the residual geometrical errors (dr) and their impact on the clinical target volumes (CTV) dose coverage for head and neck cancer (HNC) proton therapy patients.Methods: We analysed 28 HNC patients treated with 70 Gy (RBE) and 54.25 Gy (RBE) to the therapeutic CTV70 and prophylactic CTV54.25, respectively. Daily cone beam CTs were converted to high quality synthetic CTs (sCTs). The CTVs from the nominal CT were propagated to the corresponding sCTs using a hybrid deformable image registration (propagated CTVs) in RayStation 11B. For 11 patients, all propagated CTVs were reviewed by our HNC radiation oncologist (physician corrected CTVs). The residual geometrical error dr was quantified as a function of the daily CTVs volume overlap with the nominal plan CTV. The errors dr(propagated CTVs) and dr(physician corrected CTVs) and the difference in dice similarity coefficients (ADSC) were determined. Using clinical plans, dose coverage and the tumor control probability (TCP) for the nominal, accumulated and voxel-wise minimum scenarios were determined.Results: The difference in the residual geometrical error dr (propagated CTVs - physician corrected CTVs) and mean DSC (|ADSC|mean) were minor: Adr(CTV70) = 0.16 mm, Adr(CTV54.25) = 0.26 mm, |ADSC| mean < 0.9%. For all 28 patients, dr(CTV70) = 1.91 mm and dr(CTV54.25) =1.90 mm. However, CTV54.25 above and below the cricoid cartilage differed substantially (1.00 mm c.f. 3.93 mm). The CTV54.25 cover-age below the cricoid was then almost always lower, although the TCP of the accumulated dose was higher than the TCP of the voxel-wise minimum dose.Conclusions: Setup uncertainty setting of 2 mm is possible. The feasibility of using propagated CTVs for error determination is demonstrated.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 188 (2023) 109856 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   The dosimetric and clinical advantages of the GTV-CTV-PTV margins reduction by 6 mm in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Significant acute and late toxicity reduction [J].
Al-Mamgani, Abrahim ;
Kessels, Rob ;
Janssen, Tomas ;
Navran, Arash ;
van Beek, Suzanne ;
Carbaat, Casper ;
Schreuder, Willem H. ;
Sonke, Jan-Jakob ;
Marijnen, Corrie A. M. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 168 :16-22
[2]   Estimation of daily interfractional larynx residual setup error after isocentric alignment for head and neck radiotherapy: quality assurance implications for target volume and organs-at-risk margination using daily CT on-rails imaging [J].
Baron, Charles A. ;
Awan, Musaddiq J. ;
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. ;
Akel, Imad ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Gunn, G. Brandon ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Dyer, Brandon A. ;
Court, Laurence ;
Sevak, Parag R. ;
Kocak-Uzel, Esengul ;
Fuller, Clifton D. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (01) :159-169
[3]   Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancers [J].
Biau, J. ;
Pointreau, Y. ;
Blanchard, P. ;
Khampan, C. ;
Giraud, P. ;
Lapeyre, M. ;
Maingon, P. .
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2022, 26 (1-2) :206-212
[4]   Time of PTV is ending, robust optimization comes next [J].
Biston, M-C ;
Chiavassa, S. ;
Gregoire, V ;
Thariat, J. ;
Lacornerie, T. .
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2020, 24 (6-7) :676-686
[5]   DYNAMIC MRI ANALYSIS OF TUMOR AND ORGAN MOTION DURING REST AND DEGLUTITION AND MARGIN ASSESSMENT FOR RADIOTHERAPY OF HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER [J].
Bradley, Julie A. ;
Paulson, Eric S. ;
Ahunbay, Ergun ;
Schultz, Christopher ;
Li, X. Allen ;
Wang, Dian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (05) :E803-E812
[6]   Intraobserver Variability: Should We Worry? [J].
Bridge, Pete ;
Fielding, Andrew ;
Rowntree, Pamela ;
Pullar, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2016, 47 (03) :217-220
[7]   Intrafraction motion quantification and planning target volume margin determination of head-and-neck tumors using cine magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bruijnen, Tom ;
Stemkens, Bjorn ;
Terhaard, Chris H. J. ;
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. ;
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. ;
Tijssen, Rob H. N. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 130 :82-88
[8]   Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Unkelbach, Jan ;
Trofimov, Alexei ;
Madden, Thomas ;
Kooy, Hanne ;
Bortfeld, Thomas ;
Craft, David .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03) :591-608
[9]   Quantification of plan robustness against different uncertainty sources for classical and anatomical robust optimized treatment plans in head and neck cancer proton therapy [J].
Cubillos-Mesias, Macarena ;
Troost, Esther G. C. ;
Lohaus, Fabian ;
Agolli, Linda ;
Rehm, Maximilian ;
Richter, Christian ;
Stuetzer, Kristin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107)
[10]   Assessment of residual setup errors for anatomical sub-structures in image-guided head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy [J].
Djordjevic, Milos ;
Sjoholm, Emmelie ;
Tullgren, Owe ;
Sorcini, Bruno .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2014, 53 (05) :646-653