What indications for contrast-enhanced digital mammography in 2023?

被引：0

作者：

Ramette, Guillaume ^{[1
]}

Laurent, Nicolas ^{[1
,2
]}

Istrati, Diana ^{[2
]}

Poclet, Thibault ^{[1
]}

Lupu, Teodora ^{[2
]}

Poncelet, Edouard ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Ctr Hosp Valenciennes, Serv imagerie femme, 144 Ave Desandrouin, F-59300 Valenciennes, France

[2] Ctr Hosp Armentieres, Imagerie femme, 112 Rue Sadi Carnot, F-59280 Armentieres, France

来源：

IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME | 2023年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

Breast; Contrast-enhanced digital mammography; CEDM; Breast neoplasm; Solving problem; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; BREAST-CANCER; MRI; RISK; ADJUNCT; WOMEN;

D O I：

10.1016/j.femme.2023.03.020

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

After ten years of experimental use, dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography now benefits from recommendations for approved indications and potential indications, on the strength of a growing national deployment, possibilities of biopsies since 2021, approval of the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (Bi-Rads) common lexicon since 2022 and finally a recent specific quotation. Its use is validated when contrast imaging is necessary but MRI contraindicated, and possible without contraindication to MRI when contrast imaging is recommended. (c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：125 / 132

页数：8

共 13 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2021, Traitements locoregionaux des cancers du sein infiltrants non metastatiques

[2] Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013 [J].

Badr, S. ;

Laurent, N. ;

Regis, C. ;

Boulanger, L. ;

Lemaille, S. ;

Poncelet, E. .

DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 95 (03) :245-258

[3] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size [J].

Fallenberg, E. M. ;

Dromain, C. ;

Diekmann, F. ;

Engelken, F. ;

Krohn, M. ;

Singh, J. M. ;

Ingold-Heppner, B. ;

Winzer, K. J. ;

Bick, U. ;

Renz, D. M. .

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) :256-264

[4] Comparison of screening CEDM and MRI for women at increased risk for breast cancer: A pilot study [J].

Jochelson, Maxine S. ;

Pinker, Katja ;

Dershaw, D. David ;

Hughes, Mary ;

Gibbons, Girard F. ;

Rahbar, Kareem ;

Robson, Mark E. ;

Mangino, Debra A. ;

Goldman, Debra ;

Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;

Morris, Elizabeth A. ;

Sung, Janice S. .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 97 :37-43

[5] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme [J].

Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;

Lalji, Ulrich ;

Houwers, Janneke ;

Nijssen, Estelle C. ;

Nelemans, Patty J. ;

van Roozendaal, Lori ;

Smidt, Marjolein L. ;

Heuts, Esther ;

Wildberger, Joachim E. .

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (07) :1668-1676

[6]

Luczynska E, 2016, ANTICANCER RES, V36, P4359

[7] Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR [J].

Monticciolo, Debra L. ;

Newell, Mary S. ;

Moy, Linda ;

Niell, Bethany ;

Monsees, Barbara ;

Sickles, Edward A. .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (03) :408-414

[8]

Nahmias F, 2021, Rapport d'evaluation

[9] Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion [J].

Patel, Bhavika K. ;

Naylor, Michelle E. ;

Kosiorek, Heidi E. ;

Lopez-Alvarez, Yania M. ;

Miller, Adrian M. ;

Pizzitola, Victor J. ;

Pockaj, Barbara A. .

CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 46 :44-52

[10] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes [J].

Phillips, Jordana ;

Miller, Matthew M. ;

Mehta, Tejas S. ;

Fein-Zachary, Valerie ;

Nathanson, Audrey ;

Hori, Wendy ;

Monahan-Earley, Rita ;

Slanetz, Priscilla J. .

CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 42 :193-197

← 1 2 →