Mortgage Refinancing, Consumer Spending, and Competition: Evidence from the Home Affordable Refinance Program

被引:24
作者
Agarwal, Sumit [1 ]
Amromin, Gene [2 ]
Chomsisengphet, Souphala [3 ]
Landvoigt, Tim [4 ]
Piskorski, Tomasz [5 ,6 ]
Seru, Amit [6 ,7 ]
Yao, Vincent [8 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Fed Reserve Bank Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[3] OCC, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Wharton, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Columbia Business Sch, New York, NY USA
[6] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[7] Hoover Inst War Revolut & Peace, Stanford GSB, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Financial crisis; HARP; Debt; Refinancing; Consumption; Spending; Household finance; Mortgages; Competition; Policy intervention; HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION; LIQUIDITY CONSTRAINTS; PREDICTABLE CHANGES; INTEREST-RATES; DEBT RESPONSE; INCOME; MARKET; PRICES; EQUITY; POLICY;
D O I
10.1093/restud/rdac039
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the ability of the government to impact mortgage refinancing activity and spur consumption by focusing on the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) that relaxed housing equity constraints by extending government credit guarantee on insufficiently collateralized refinanced mortgages. Difference-in-difference tests based on program eligibility criteria reveal a significant increase in refinancing activity by HARP. More than three million eligible borrowers with primarily fixed-rate mortgages refinanced under HARP, receiving an average reduction of 1.45% in interest rate ($3,000 in annual savings). Durable spending by borrowers increased significantly after refinancing. Regions more exposed to the program saw a relative increase in non-durable and durable consumer spending, a decline in foreclosure rates, and faster recovery in house prices. Competitive frictions in the refinancing market hampered the program's impact: the take-up rate and annual savings among those who refinanced were reduced by 10-20%, with amplified effects for the most indebted borrowers.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 537
页数:39
相关论文
共 78 条
[21]   Mortgage Market Design [J].
Campbell, John Y. .
REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2013, 17 (01) :1-33
[22]   Forced Sales and House Prices [J].
Campbell, John Y. ;
Giglio, Stefano ;
Pathak, Parag .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (05) :2108-2131
[23]   Household risk management and optimal mortgage choice [J].
Campbell, JY ;
Cocco, JF .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1449-1494
[24]   Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis [J].
Carroll, CD .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (01) :1-55
[25]   On the concavity of the consumption function [J].
Carroll, CD ;
Kimball, MS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (04) :981-992
[26]   HOUSING BOOMS, MANUFACTURING DECLINE AND LABOUR MARKET OUTCOMES [J].
Charles, Kerwin Kofi ;
Hurst, Erik ;
Notowidigdo, Matthew J. .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2019, 129 (617) :209-248
[27]   Houses as ATMs: Mortgage Refinancing and Macroeconomic Uncertainty [J].
Chen, Hui ;
Michaux, Michael ;
Roussanov, Nikolai .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2020, 75 (01) :323-375
[28]   How Quantitative Easing Works: Evidence on the Refinancing Channel [J].
di Maggio, Marco ;
Kermani, Amir ;
Palmer, Christopher J. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 87 (03) :1498-1528
[29]   Interest Rate Pass-Through: Mortgage Rates, Household Consumption, and Voluntary Deleveraging [J].
Di Maggio, Marco ;
Kermani, Amir ;
Keys, Benjamin J. ;
Piskorski, Tomasz ;
Ramcharan, Rodney ;
Seru, Amit ;
Yao, Vincent .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (11) :3550-3588
[30]  
Eberly J, 2014, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P73