Towards a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke: What should we measure?

被引:2
作者
Mitchell, Claire [1 ,11 ]
Woodward-Nutt, Kate [2 ]
Dancer, Annette [3 ]
Taylor, Stephen [3 ]
Bugler, Joe [3 ]
Bowen, Audrey [4 ]
Conroy, Paul [5 ]
Whelan, Brooke-Mai [6 ]
Wallace, Sarah J. [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
El Kouaissi, Sabrina [1 ]
Kirkham, Jamie [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Res Ctr, Div Psychol Commun & Human Neurosci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Salford Royal Hosp, Northern Care Alliance, Res & Innovat, Salford, England
[3] HEARD Grp, Healing Empowering & Recovering Dysarthria, Patient Publ Involvement, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Res Ctr, Div Psychol & Mental Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Linguist Speech & Commun Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[7] Univ Queensland, Queensland Aphasia Res Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Univ Queensland, Surg Treatment & Rehabil Serv STARS Educ & Res All, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] MetroNorth Hlth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[10] Univ Manchester, Ctr Biostat, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[11] Univ Manchester, Stroke Rehabil & Res, Room G705,Stopford Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Dysarthria; stroke; outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1177/02692155241231929
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective To identify and agree on what outcome domains should be measured in research and clinical practice when working with stroke survivors who have dysarthria.Design Delphi process, two rounds of an online survey followed by two online consensus meetings.Setting UK and Australia.Participants Stroke survivors with experience of dysarthria, speech and language therapists/pathologists working in stroke and communication researchers.Methods Initial list of outcome domains generated from existing literature and with our patient and public involvement group to develop the survey. Participants completed two rounds of this survey to rate importance. Outcomes were identified as 'in', 'unclear' or 'out' from the second survey. All participants were invited to two consensus meetings to discuss these results followed by voting to identify critically important outcome domains for a future Core Outcome Set. All outcomes were voted on in the consensus meetings and included if 70% of meeting participants voted 'yes' for critically important.Results In total, 148 surveys were fully completed, and 28 participants attended the consensus meetings. A core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke should include four outcome domains: (a) intelligibility of speech, (b) ability to participate in conversations, (c) living well with dysarthria, (d) skills and knowledge of communication partners (where relevant).Conclusions We describe the consensus of 'what' speech outcomes after stroke are valued by all stakeholders including those with lived experience. We share these findings to encourage the measurement of these domains in clinical practice and research and for future research to identify 'how' best to measure these outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:802 / 810
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, Disability and Health (ICF), endorsed by all, P191
  • [2] A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
    Bellucci, Chiara
    Hughes, Karen
    Toomey, Elaine
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Matvienko-Sikar, Karen
    [J]. TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [3] Methods to improve patient recruitment and retention in stroke trials
    Berge, Eivind
    Stapf, Christian
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    Ford, Gary A.
    Sandercock, Peter
    van der Worp, H. Bart
    Petersson, Jesper
    Dippel, Diederik W. J.
    Krieger, Derk W.
    Lees, Kennedy R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2016, 11 (06) : 663 - 676
  • [4] The impact of stroke-related dysarthria on social participation and implications for rehabilitation
    Brady, Marian C.
    Clark, Alexander M.
    Dickson, Sylvia
    Paton, Gillian
    Barbour, Rosaline S.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 33 (03) : 178 - 186
  • [5] Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
    Chalmers, Iain
    Glasziou, Paul
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 374 (9683) : 86 - 89
  • [6] DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTIC PATTERNS OF DYSARTHRIA
    DARLEY, FL
    ARONSON, AE
    BROWN, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1969, 12 (02): : 246 - &
  • [7] Delbanco T, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P144, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00145.x
  • [8] ICF core sets for stroke
    Geyh, S
    Cieza, A
    Schouten, J
    Dickson, H
    Frommelt, P
    Omar, Z
    Kostanjsek, N
    Ring, H
    Stucki, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2004, 36 : 135 - 141
  • [9] Reasons Underlying Racial Differences in Stroke Incidence and Mortality
    Howard, Virginia J.
    [J]. STROKE, 2013, 44 (06) : S126 - S128
  • [10] A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health
    Hughes, Karen L.
    Clarke, Mike
    Williamson, Paula R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 129 : 114 - 123