Commercialisation time and licensing performance of university inventions: the moderating role of university inventors

被引:2
作者
Jeong, Yoon-Ho [1 ]
Kim, Young-Choon [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Min, Kyung-Baek [2 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Technol & Innovat Management, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Sch Business Adm, Ulsan, South Korea
[3] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Carbon Neutral, Ulsan, South Korea
[4] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Sch Business Adm, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
[5] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Technol & Innovat Management, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
[6] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Grad Sch Carbon Neutral, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Technology commercialisation; licensing revenue; commercialisation time; university inventions; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; DEVELOPMENT SPEED; SUCCESS FACTORS; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; BERKELEY; STANFORD;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2280547
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between time and performance in the commercialisation of university-originated inventions. Focusing on the commercialisation time, defined as the time taken for a lab-scale invention to be developed for commercial sale, we investigate whether there is any systematic association between commercialisation time and the licensing revenue generated by university-originated inventions. Analysing a sample of inventions from Stanford University, we find that both pre- and postlicensing time of commercialisation are negatively associated with its licensing revenue. We also find that the negative relationship between the postlicensing time of commercialisation and licensing revenue is contingent on the inventor's orientation towards university-industry collaboration. We discuss theoretical and practical implications of our findings as well as future avenues of research in technology commercialisation.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 48
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge
    Agrawal, A
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (01) : 63 - 79
  • [2] Allain M.-L., 2011, Inefficiencies in technology transfer: Theory and empirics
  • [3] Organizing for continuous technology acquisition: the role of R&D geographic dispersion
    Ardito, Lorenzo
    Natalicchio, Angelo
    Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni
    Garavelli, Achille Claudio
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (02) : 165 - 176
  • [4] Ideas for rent: an overview of markets for technology
    Arora, Ashish
    Gambardella, Alfonso
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2010, 19 (03) : 775 - 803
  • [5] Association of University Technology Managers Inc., 2022, AUTM LIC SURV FY 202
  • [6] University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all
    Baglieri, Daniela
    Baldi, Francesco
    Tucci, Christopher L.
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2018, 76-77 : 51 - 63
  • [7] University patenting: patterns of faculty motivations
    Baldini, Nicola
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2011, 23 (02) : 103 - 121
  • [8] Determinants of new product development speed in China: A strategy tripod perspective
    Bao, Yongchuan
    Su, Zhongfeng
    Noble, Charles H.
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2021, 106
  • [9] The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model
    Bozeman, Barry
    Rimes, Heather
    Youtie, Jan
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (01) : 34 - 49
  • [10] Cameron AC., 2022, MICROECONOMETRICS US, VSecond