Reduced isometric knee extensor force following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the ipsilateral motor cortex

被引:3
|
作者
Savoury, Ryan G. [1 ]
Kibele, Armin [2 ]
Power, Kevin [1 ]
Herat, Nehara [1 ]
Alizadeh, Shahab [1 ]
Behm, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Sch Human Kinet & Recreat, St John, NF, Canada
[2] Univ Kassel, Inst Sport & Sport Sci, Kassel, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
POSTACTIVATION POTENTIATION; PERCEIVED EXERTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; ELBOW FLEXORS; TASK FAILURE; WARM-UP; TDCS; TIME; EXCITABILITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0280129
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe goal of this study was to determine if 10-min of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) to the motor cortex (M1) is capable of modulating quadriceps isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force or fatigue endurance contralateral or ipsilateral to the stimulation site. MethodsIn a randomized, cross-over design, 16 (8 females) individuals underwent two sessions of a-tDCS and two sham tDCS (s-tDCS) sessions targeting the left M1 (all participants were right limb dominant), with testing of either the left (ipsilateral) or right (contralateral) quadriceps. Knee extensor (KE) MVC force was recorded prior to and following the a-tDCS and s-tDCS protocols. Additionally, a repetitive MVC fatiguing protocol (12 MVCs with work-rest ratio of 5:10-s) was completed following each tDCS protocol. ResultsThere was a significant interaction effect for stimulation condition x leg tested x time [F-(1,F-60) = 7.156, p = 0.010, eta p(2) = 0.11], which revealed a significant absolute KE MVC force reduction in the contralateral leg following s-tDCS (p < 0.001, d = 1.2) and in the ipsilateral leg following a-tDCS (p < 0.001, d = 1.09). A significant interaction effect for condition x leg tested [F-(1,F-56) = 8.12, p = 0.006, eta p(2) = 0.13], showed a significantly lower ipsilateral quadriceps (to tDCS) relative MVC force with a-tDCS, versus s-tDCS [t(15) = -3.07, p = 0.016, d = -0.77]. There was no significant difference between the relative contralateral quadriceps (to tDCS) MVC force for a-tDCS and s-tDCS. Although there was an overall significant [F-(1,F-56) = 8.36, p < 0.001] 12.1% force decrease between the first and twelfth MVC repetitions, there were no significant main or interaction effects for fatigue index force. Conclusiona-tDCS may be ineffective at increasing maximal force or endurance and instead may be detrimental to quadriceps force production.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex
    Hunter, Timothy
    Sacco, Paul
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Turner, Duncan L.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2009, 587 (12): : 2949 - 2961
  • [22] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
    Fregni, F
    Boggio, PS
    Nitsche, M
    Bermpohl, F
    Antal, A
    Feredoes, E
    Marcolin, MA
    Rigonatti, SP
    Silva, MTA
    Paulus, W
    Pascual-Leone, A
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 166 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [23] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
    Felipe Fregni
    Paulo S. Boggio
    Michael Nitsche
    Felix Bermpohl
    Andrea Antal
    Eva Feredoes
    Marco A. Marcolin
    Sergio P. Rigonatti
    Maria T.A. Silva
    Walter Paulus
    Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 166 : 23 - 30
  • [24] Transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex in waking resting state induces motor imagery
    Speth, Jana
    Speth, Clemens
    Harley, Trevor A.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2015, 36 : 298 - 305
  • [25] Short-Term Effects of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Endurance and Maximal Force Production: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alix-Fages, Carlos
    Romero-Arenas, Salvador
    Castro-Alonso, Marcos
    Colomer-Poveda, David
    Rio-Rodriguez, Dan
    Jerez-Martinez, Agustin
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    Marquez, Gonzalo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (04)
  • [26] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Right Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Impairs Implicit Motor Sequence Learning of the Ipsilateral Hand
    Keitel, Ariane
    Ofsteng, Henning
    Krause, Vanessa
    Pollok, Bettina
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [27] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [28] Commentary: Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability
    Hanley, Claire J.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [29] Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Hagenacker, Tim
    Bude, Vera
    Naegel, Steffen
    Holle, Dagny
    Katsarava, Zaza
    Diener, Hans-Christoph
    Obermann, Mark
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15
  • [30] No Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Motor Cortex on Response-Related ERPs during a Conflict Task
    Conley, Alexander C.
    Fulham, W. R.
    Marquez, Jodie L.
    Parsons, Mark W.
    Karayanidis, Frini
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10 : 13