Associations of Surgical Team Communication With the Layout of Physical Space: A Network Analysis of the Operating Room in a Military Medical Center

被引:1
作者
Kabo, Felichism W. [1 ,4 ]
Stucky, Christopher H. [2 ]
De Jong, Marla J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Landstuhl Reg Med Ctr, Ctr Nursing Sci & Clin Inquiry, Landstuhl, Rheinland Pfalz, Germany
[3] Univ Utah, Coll Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
surgery; communication; surgical teams; operating room layout; spatial configuration; PROXIMITY; COLLABORATION; WORKPLACE; DYNAMICS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1177/19375867231159130
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aim: To examine how the spatial topology of the operating room (OR) within the medical center impacts surgical team communication. Background: Understanding the complex association between surgical team communication and the OR's spatial network location is critical to patient safety. Effective surgical communication is associated with fewer adverse events and medical errors. Methods: We employed a cross-sectional, quantitative, case study, and network-centric study design. We studied the population of 204 clinicians in a large military medical center (36 perioperative nurses, 34 surgical technicians, 62 anesthesia providers, and 72 surgeons), focusing on surgical teams with cases completed within duty hours. Data were collected from December 2020 to June 2021 using an electronic survey. Spatial network analysis was done using electronic floor plans. Statistical analysis was done with descriptive statistics and linear regressions. The outcomes were general and task-specific communication, and team-level variables were aggregated from scores for all team members. Spatial effects were assessed with network centrality (degree, Laplacian, and betweenness). Results: The individual-level survey response rate was 77% (157 of 204). Data were collected on 137 surgical teams. On a 5-point scale, general and task-specific communication ranged from 3.4 to 5.0 and 3.5 to 5.0, respectively (for both, median = 4.7). Team size ranged from 4 to 6 individuals (median = 4). Surgical suites with higher network centralities were associated with significantly lower communication scores. Conclusions: The OR's spatial network location has important impacts on surgical team communication. Our findings have design and workflow implications for ORs and even surgical care in combat zones.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 145
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AAPC, 2022, WORK RVU CALC REL VA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Managing the flow of technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R
[3]   Organizational ecology and knowledge networks [J].
Becker, Franklin .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 49 (02) :42-+
[4]   Combat casualty care and lessons learned from the past 100 years of war [J].
Bradley, Matthew ;
Nealiegh, Matthew ;
Oh, John S. ;
Rothberg, Philip ;
Elster, Eric A. ;
Rich, Norman M. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2017, 54 (06) :315-351
[5]   Proximity and collaboration: measuring workplace configuration [J].
Brown, M. Gordon .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE REAL ESTATE, 2008, 10 (01) :5-+
[6]   A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room [J].
Christian, CK ;
Gustafson, ML ;
Roth, EM ;
Sheridan, TB ;
Gandhi, TK ;
Dwyer, K ;
Zinner, MJ ;
Dierks, MM .
SURGERY, 2006, 139 (02) :159-173
[7]  
Cordeiro M., 2018, ARXIV
[8]   Centrality measures in spatial networks of urban streets [J].
Crucitti, P ;
Latora, V ;
Porta, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 73 (03)
[9]   Beyond Occupational Differences: The Importance of Crosscutting Demographics and Dyadic Toolkits for Collaboration in a US Hospital [J].
DiBenigno, Julia ;
Kellogg, Katherine C. .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2014, 59 (03) :375-408
[10]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166