Multiparameter diagnostic model based on 18F-FDG PET metabolic parameters and clinical variables can differentiate nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer and cholecystitis

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Can [1 ]
Luan, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Bi, Xiao [1 ]
Chen, Shengxin [2 ,3 ]
Pan, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jingfeng [1 ,2 ]
Han, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xiaodan [1 ]
Wang, Guanyun [1 ,4 ]
Xu, Baixuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Nucl Med, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Grad Sch, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 1, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Nucl Med Dept, 95 Yongan Rd, Beijing 100050, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; Nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer; Cholecystitis; Multiparameter; Metabolic parameters; differential diagnosis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RESIDUAL DISEASE; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; BENIGN; CT;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-10599-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of a multiparameter model based on F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (F-18-FDG PET) metabolic parameters and clinical variables in differentiating nonmetastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC) from cholecystitis.Patients and methodsIn total, 122 patients (88 GBC nonmetastatic patients and 34 cholecystitis patients) with gallbladder space-occupying lesions who underwent F-18-FDG PET/CT were included. All patients received surgery and pathology, and baseline characteristics and clinical data were also collected. The metabolic parameters of F-18-FDG PET, including SUVmax (maximum standard uptake value), SUVmean (mean standard uptake value), SUVpeak (peak standard uptake value), MTV (metabolic tumour volume), TLG (total lesion glycolysis) and SUVR (tumour-to-normal liver standard uptake value ratio), were evaluated. The differential diagnostic efficacy of each independent parameter and multiparameter combination model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The improvement in diagnostic efficacy using a combination of the above multiple parameters was evaluated by integrated discriminatory improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and bootstrap test. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate clinical efficacy.ResultsThe ROC curve showed that SUVR had the highest diagnostic ability among the F-18-FDG PET metabolic parameters (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.698; sensitivity = 0.341; specificity = 0.971; positive predictive value [PPV] = 0.968; negative predictive value [NPV] = 0.363). The combined diagnostic model of cholecystolithiasis, fever, CEA > 5 ng/ml and SUVR showed an AUC of 0.899 (sensitivity = 0.909, specificity = 0.735, PPV = 0.899, NPV = 0.758). The diagnostic efficiency of the model was improved significantly compared with SUVR. The clinical efficacy of the model was confirmed by DCA.ConclusionsThe multiparameter diagnostic model composed of F-18-FDG PET metabolic parameters (SUVR) and clinical variables, including patient signs (fever), medical history (cholecystolithiasis) and laboratory examination (CEA > 5 ng/ml), has good diagnostic efficacy in the differential diagnosis of nonmetastatic GBC and cholecystitis.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer
    Nawi, Norazlina Mat
    Mohamad, Irfan
    Khader, Mohamed Ali Abdul
    Shuaib, Ibrahim Lutfi
    BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 20 (02): : 302 - 312
  • [22] Prognostic Significance of Metabolic Parameters by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Thymic Epithelial Tumors
    Lee, Joohee
    Cho, Young Seok
    Kim, Jhingook
    Shim, Young Mog
    Lee, Kyung-Han
    Choi, Joon Young
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 10
  • [23] 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters can semi-quantitatively evaluate the nature of the heart and pericardial masses: a retrospective study
    Hu, Xianwen
    Yang, Peiqing
    Pan, Dongfeng
    Wang, Pan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] Diagnostic and Predictive Values of 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in EGFR-Mutated Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Hong, Il Ki
    Lee, Jeong Mi
    Hwang, In Kyoung
    Paik, Seung Sook
    Kim, Chanwoo
    Lee, Seung Hyeun
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 6453 - 6465
  • [25] Basal 18F-FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma: A comparison of metabolic and clinical variables in the prognostic assessment
    Jimenez Londono, G. A.
    Garcia Vicente, A. M.
    Poblete Garcia, V. M.
    Amo-Salas, M.
    Calle Primo, C.
    Ibanez Garcia, A.
    Martinez Sanchis, B.
    Lopez-Fidalgo, J. F.
    Solano Ramos, F.
    Martinez Hellin, A.
    Diaz Morfa, M.
    Soriano Castrejon, A.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2016, 35 (05): : 298 - 305
  • [26] The value of a nomogram based on 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters and metabolic heterogeneity in predicting distant metastasis in gastric cancer
    Zhang, Guanjie
    Shi, Aiqi
    Ding, Xiaofang
    Wang, Jianlin
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, : 219 - 227
  • [27] Metabolic Characteristics and Diagnostic Contribution of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Gastric Carcinomas
    Arslan, Esra
    Aksoy, Tamer
    Gundogan, Cihan
    Sen, Cigdem
    Tatar, Selda Yilmaz
    Dursun, Nevra
    Cermik, Tevfik Fikret
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY, 2020, 29 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [28] A Diagnostic Nomogram Based on 18F-FDG PET/CT for Bone Metastasis of Gastric Cancer
    Wu, Chunhui
    Lin, Xiaoping
    Li, Zhoulei
    Chen, Zhifeng
    Xie, Wenhui
    Zhang, Xiangsong
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [29] Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer
    Tsuyoshi, Hideaki
    Tsujikawa, Tetsuya
    Yamada, Shizuka
    Okazawa, Hidehiko
    Yoshida, Yoshio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (02)
  • [30] Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Yang, Lifeng
    Wang, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12