Projects aimed at smart cities: a hybrid MCDA evaluation approach

被引:5
作者
Aragao, Franciely Velozo [1 ]
de Oliveira Gomes, Pedro Fernandes [2 ]
Chiroli, Daiane de Genaro [1 ]
Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli [1 ]
Rocha Loures, Eduardo de Freitas [2 ]
Portela Santos, Eduardo Alves [2 ]
Colmenero, Joao Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, Dept Ind Engn, Av Monteiro Lobato,Km 04, BR-84016210 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana PUC, Dept Ind Engn, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Smart cities; MCDA; project evaluation; DECISION-MAKING; DEMATEL; SELECTION; INFORMATION; INDICATORS; RANKING;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2021.1999405
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Project evaluation is a process that involves multiple decision criteria for different objectives and involves several specialists, becoming a complex decision-making process. In this sense, to reduce projects evaluation subjectivity in start-ups selection processes, this paper aims at structuring an evaluation model to select projects that present business models focused on strategies for smart cities. To test the proposed model, it was considered a smart cities project selection program in a medium-size city located on southside of Brazil. To do so, it was considered a multicriteria analysis method, in which relevant evaluation criteria for projects focused on intelligent cities were identified. Subsequently, Decision-Making And Trial Evaluation Laboratories (DEMATEL) method was used to weigh these identified evaluation criteria and, finally, TOPSIS method was instantiated to select the best alternative - the evaluated projects - among all alternatives. As a result, the multicriteria proposed model proved to be efficient in evaluating projects aimed at smart cities concepts, showing that the use of MCDA methods can minimise uncertainty and bias in evaluating projects in a quantitative approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1262
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Combined DEMATEL techniques with novel MCDM for the organic light emitting diode technology selection
    Shen, Yung-Chi
    Lin, Grace T. R.
    Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1468 - 1481
  • [32] Equipment selection in mineral processing - A sensitivity analysis approach for a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model
    Sitorus, Fernando
    Brito-Parada, Pablo R.
    [J]. MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2020, 150
  • [33] Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer Offices: An Approach Based on Levels of Maturity
    Soares, Adriano Mesquita
    Kovaleski, Joao Luiz
    Gaia, Silvia
    de Genaro Chiroli, Daiane Maria
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05) : 1 - 22
  • [34] Sumrit D, 2013, INT TRANS J ENG MANA, V4, P81
  • [35] An organizational decision support system for effective R&D project selection
    Tian, QJ
    Ma, J
    Liang, JZ
    Kwok, RCW
    Liu, O
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2005, 39 (03) : 403 - 413
  • [36] Yago, 2018, INT C PROD OP MAN SO, P669
  • [37] Research project evaluation and selection: an evidential reasoning rule-based method for aggregating peer review information with reliabilities
    Zhu, Wei-dong
    Liu, Fang
    Chen, Yu-wang
    Yang, Jian-bo
    Xu, Dong-ling
    Wang, Dong-peng
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (03) : 1469 - 1490
  • [38] Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln
    Zola, Fernando Cavicchioli
    Colmenero, Joao Carlos
    Aragao, Franciely Velozo
    Rodrigues, Thaisa
    Braghini Junior, Aldo
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 190