Projects aimed at smart cities: a hybrid MCDA evaluation approach

被引:5
作者
Aragao, Franciely Velozo [1 ]
de Oliveira Gomes, Pedro Fernandes [2 ]
Chiroli, Daiane de Genaro [1 ]
Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli [1 ]
Rocha Loures, Eduardo de Freitas [2 ]
Portela Santos, Eduardo Alves [2 ]
Colmenero, Joao Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Technol Parana UTFPR, Dept Ind Engn, Av Monteiro Lobato,Km 04, BR-84016210 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Parana PUC, Dept Ind Engn, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Smart cities; MCDA; project evaluation; DECISION-MAKING; DEMATEL; SELECTION; INFORMATION; INDICATORS; RANKING;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2021.1999405
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Project evaluation is a process that involves multiple decision criteria for different objectives and involves several specialists, becoming a complex decision-making process. In this sense, to reduce projects evaluation subjectivity in start-ups selection processes, this paper aims at structuring an evaluation model to select projects that present business models focused on strategies for smart cities. To test the proposed model, it was considered a smart cities project selection program in a medium-size city located on southside of Brazil. To do so, it was considered a multicriteria analysis method, in which relevant evaluation criteria for projects focused on intelligent cities were identified. Subsequently, Decision-Making And Trial Evaluation Laboratories (DEMATEL) method was used to weigh these identified evaluation criteria and, finally, TOPSIS method was instantiated to select the best alternative - the evaluated projects - among all alternatives. As a result, the multicriteria proposed model proved to be efficient in evaluating projects aimed at smart cities concepts, showing that the use of MCDA methods can minimise uncertainty and bias in evaluating projects in a quantitative approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1262
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives
    Albino, Vito
    Berardi, Umberto
    Dangelico, Rosa Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [2] Archer N. P., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P207, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00032-5
  • [3] A New DST-Belief Theoretic Project Selection Model for Multi-Criteria Decision Support System
    Bakshi T.
    Sinharay A.
    Sarkar B.
    Sanyal S.K.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2015, 96 (04) : 337 - 349
  • [4] Bakshi T., 2011, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV, V2, P14
  • [5] Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection
    Baykasoglu, Adil
    Kaplanoglu, Vahit
    Durmusoglu, Zeynep D. U.
    Sahin, Cenk
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (03) : 899 - 907
  • [6] A DEMATEL analysis of smart city determinants
    Braga, Irina F. B.
    Ferreira, Fernando A. F.
    Ferreira, Joao J. M.
    Correia, Ricardo J. C.
    Pereira, Leandro F.
    Falcao, Pedro F.
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 66
  • [7] A fuzzy robust evaluation model for selecting and ranking NPD projects using Bayesian belief network and weight-restricted DEA
    Chiang, Tzu-An
    Che, Z. H.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (11) : 7408 - 7418
  • [8] Colmenero J.C, 2020, SAUDE GEOESPACIAL, V15, P92
  • [9] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Hayajneh, Mohammed
    Batieha, Farhan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (07) : 8384 - 8391
  • [10] Social media addiction: Applying the DEMATEL approach
    Dalvi-Esfahani, Mohammad
    Niknafs, Ali
    Kuss, Dania J.
    Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh
    Afrough, Saeed
    [J]. TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 43