A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the translated versions of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire

被引:2
作者
Varela, Pinelopi [1 ,4 ]
Zervas, Ioannis [2 ]
Lykeridou, Aikaterini [3 ]
Deltsidou, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ West Att, Gen Hosp Athens Alexandra, Dept Midwifery, Agios Spyridon, Athens 12243, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ, Eginit Univ Hosp, Womens Mental Hlth & Reprod Psychiat Clin, Dept Neurol 2,Athens Med Sch, Dimitressa 10, Athens 11528, Greece
[3] Univ West Attica, Dept Nursing, Agios Spyridon, Athens 12243, Greece
[4] Ag Spyridonos 28, Athens 12243, Greece
来源
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE EUROPEENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE | 2024年 / 74卷 / 01期
关键词
Fear of childbirth; Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience; Questionnaire; Psychometrics; Pregnancy; Childbirth; Systematic review; CESAREAN-SECTION; W-DEQ; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; MATERNAL REQUEST; CHILDBIRTH; FEAR; WOMEN; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.erap.2023.100911
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Introduction. - The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire has evolved as one of the most extensively used, translated, and validated scales for the assessment of fear of childbirth. Objective. - To evaluate the psychometric properties of the translated versions of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire. Method. - We employed a systematic search of online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct, looking for articles published between 1998 and 2021. We used PRISMA guidelines for conducting and reporting this review, and the quality of the psychometric properties of the retrieved studies was assessed using the COSMIN checklist. Results. - Of the 825 records initially identified, 18 studies were included. The examination of these studies showed that the scale exists in at least 17 different languages, and it's quite possible that the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire is not a unidimensional scale since the factor analysis of the included studies suggested the existence of subscales. Regarding the methodological quality of the structural validity and the construct validity, the majority of studies were considered to be very good or adequate. Internal consistency was reported in all studies. Test -retest reliability was reported in five studies. Conclusion. - The Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire's psychometrics were generally of an acceptable level of methodological quality in most of the studies. More research is needed on the examination and validation of both versions of the scale. (c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Slovak version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ), version A
    Pitel, L.
    Psenkova, P.
    Jones, C. C. G.
    Zahumensky, J.
    [J]. BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2020, 121 (06): : 415 - 421
  • [22] Fear of childbirth: Validation study of the Chinese version of Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire version B
    Lai, Theodora Hei Tung
    Kwok, Shuk Tak
    Wang, Weilan
    Seto, Mimi Tin Yan
    Cheung, Ka Wang
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2022, 108
  • [23] Translation and validation of the Swahili version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire version A (W-DEQ-A)
    Onchonga, David
    Varnagy, Akos
    Amer, Faten
    Viktoria, Premusz
    Wainaina, Pius
    [J]. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2021, 29
  • [24] Validating the use of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire in Mainland China: a descriptive, cross-sectional study
    Lu Han
    Jiaxin Wu
    Hengchang Wu
    Jun Liu
    Yanqun Liu
    Zhijie Zou
    Juan Liu
    Jinbing Bai
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [25] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) with pregnant women
    Korukcu, O.
    Kukulu, K.
    Firat, M. Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2012, 19 (03) : 193 - 202
  • [26] The psychometric properties of fear of childbirth instruments: a systematic review
    Hoseini, Bibi Leila
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Mashhadi, Ali
    Rakhshani, Mohammad Hassan
    Babazadeh, Raheleh
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [27] The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT): Α systematic review of the psychometric properties of the translated versions
    Varela, Pinelopi
    Nanou, Christina
    Bouroutzoglou, Maria
    Kyrkou, Giannoula
    Deltsidou, Anna
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2025, 9
  • [28] Factor analysis study of the Hungarian translation of Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (version A)
    Vahideh MoghaddamHosseini
    Alexandra Makai
    Diana Dweik
    Ákos Várnagy
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2020, 39 : 1098 - 1105
  • [29] Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the "Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire" (W-DEQ-B)
    Roldan-Merino, Juan
    Maria Ortega-Cejas, Celia
    Lluch-Canut, Teresa
    Farres-Tarafa, Mariona
    Biurrun-Garrido, Ainoa
    Casas, Irma
    Isabel Castrillo-Perez, M.
    Mercedes Vicente-Hernandez, M.
    Jimenez-Barragan, Marta
    Martinez-Mondejar, Raquel
    Hurtado-Pardos, Barbara
    Cabrera-Jaime, Sandra
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [30] Measurement properties of translated versions of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A systematic review
    Sudarshan, K. C.
    Sharma, Saurab
    Ginn, Karen A.
    Reed, Darren
    [J]. CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (03) : 410 - 422