Irreversible electroporation as a focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review

被引:7
作者
Prabhakar, Pushan [1 ]
Avudaiappan, Arjun Pon [2 ]
Sandman, Mayer [2 ]
Eldefrawy, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Caso, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Narayanan, Govindarajan [1 ,3 ]
Manoharan, Murugesan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Canc Inst, Div Urol Oncol Surg, Miami, FL 33176 USA
[2] Herbert Wertheim Coll Med, Dept Urol, Miami, FL USA
[3] Miami Cardiac & Vasc Inst, Dept Intervent Radiol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
HIGH ELECTRIC-FIELDS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ABLATION; OUTCOMES; SAFETY; MEN; MICROORGANISMS; FEASIBILITY; ORIGIN; CELLS;
D O I
10.4103/iju.iju_370_23
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new and promising focal therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. In this systematic review, we summarize the literature on IRE for prostate cancer published over the last decade.Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were searched with the end date of May 2023 to find relevant publications on prostate cancer ablation using IRE. Original studies with focal IRE as the primary curative treatment which reported on functional or oncological outcomes were included. The bibliography of relevant studies was also scanned to identify suitable articles.Results: A total of 14 studies reporting on 899 patients treated with IRE for localized prostate cancer were included. Of all the studies reviewed, 77% reported on recurrence within the zone of ablation, and it ranged from 0% to 38.9% for in-field and 3.6% to 28% for out-of-field recurrence. Although, a standardised follow-up protocol was not followed, all the studies employed serial prostate-specific antigen monitoring, a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and a biopsy (6-12 months post-treatment). Across all the studies, 58% reported that the urinary continence returned to the pretreatment levels and 25% reported a minor decrease in the continence from the baseline at 12-months of follow-up. Erections sufficient for intercourse varied from 44% to 75% at the baseline to 55% to 100% at 12-months of follow-up across all the studies.Conclusion: IRE, as a focal therapy, shows promising results with minimal complications and reasonably effective oncological control, but the data comparing it to the standard of care is still lacking. Future research should focus on randomized definitive comparisons between IRE, radical prostatectomy, and radiation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 16
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Initial assessment of safety and clinical feasibility of irreversible electroporation in the focal treatment of prostate cancer
    Valerio, M.
    Strickert, P. D.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    Dickinson, L.
    Ponsky, L.
    Shnier, R.
    Allen, C.
    Emberton, M.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2014, 17 (04) : 343 - 347
  • [42] Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI
    Connor, M. J.
    Gorin, M. A.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    Nigam, R.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (02) : 232 - 243
  • [43] Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer--A systematic review
    Thomsen, Frederik B.
    Brasso, Klaus
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Berg, Kasper D.
    Iversen, Peter
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 109 (08) : 830 - 835
  • [44] The Role of Focal Therapy in the Management of Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Valerio, Massimo
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Emberton, Mark
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Trachtenberg, John
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) : 732 - 751
  • [45] Morbidity of Focal Therapy in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Barret, Eric
    Ahallal, Youness
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Galiano, Marc
    Cosset, Jean-Marc
    Validire, Pierre
    Macek, Petr
    Durand, Matthieu
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Rozet, Francois
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 618 - 622
  • [46] Patient selection for focal therapy of localized prostate cancer
    Jayram, Gautarn
    Eggener, Scott E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) : 268 - 273
  • [47] The efficacy and safety of the open approach irreversible electroporation in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review
    Charalambous, Pabos
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Karachaliou, Georgia-Sofia
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    Dimitrokallis, Nikolaos
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis, I
    Oikonomou, Dimitrios
    Petrou, Athanasios
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (09): : 1565 - 1572
  • [48] Systematic Review of Surgical and Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Prodromidou, Anastasia
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Weiss, Matthew
    Hasemaki, Natasha
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (06) : 1657 - 1668
  • [49] Salvage local treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after focal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Takemura, Lucas Seiti
    Costa, Pedro Henrique Peixoto
    Claros, Oliver Rojas
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael Rocha
    Teles, Saulo Borborema
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Nahar, Bruno
    Olivares, Ruben
    Montagna, Erik
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Bianco, Bianca
    Carneiro, Arie
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 (12) : 449.e1 - 449.e11
  • [50] Focal therapy for localized cancer: a patent review
    Bloemberg, Jette
    Van Riel, Luigi
    Dodou, Dimitra
    Breedveld, Paul
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2021, 18 (08) : 751 - 769