Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples

被引:0
|
作者
Oloo, Marceline Adhiambo [1 ]
Awandu, Shehu Shagari [2 ]
Onyango, Benson [1 ]
Magwanga, Richard Odongo [1 ]
Oluoch, Alfred Ochieng [1 ]
Lidechi, Shirley [3 ]
Muok, Erick Mbata [3 ]
Munga, Stephen [3 ]
Estambale, Benson [2 ]
机构
[1] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Biol Phys Math & Actuarial Sci, POB 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya
[2] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, POB 210, Bondo 40601, Kenya
[3] Kenya Med Res Inst Ctr Global Hlth Res CGHR, POB 1578-40100, Kisumu, Kenya
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; immunoglobulin G; immunoglobulin M; polymerase chain reaction; rapid antigen detection test; Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2;
D O I
10.11604/pamj.2023.46.21.39483
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: as a public health policy, the ongoing global coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination drives require continuous tracking, tracing, and testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diagnostic testing is important in virus detection and understanding its spread for timely intervention. This is especially important for low-income settings where the majority of the population remains untested. This is well supported by the fact that of about 9% of the Kenyan population had been tested for the virus. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Kisumu and Siaya Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Here we report on the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test (Ag-RDT) of SARS-CoV2 compared with the quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using stool and nasopharyngeal swab samples. Further, the mean Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in western Kenya were evaluated. Results: the sensitivity and specificity of Ag-RDT were 76.3% (95% CI, 59.8-88.6%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 87.399.5%) with a negative and positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI, 73.8%-93.0%) and 93% (95% CI, 78.6%-99.2%) respectively. There was substantial agreement of 88% (Kappa value of 0.75, 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) between Ag-RDT and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR, and between stool and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR results (83.7% agreement, Kapa value 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). The mean IgM and IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV2 were not different in asymptomatic individuals, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.78-1.44) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.651.11) compared to symptomatic individuals 4.30 (95% CI 3.30-5.31) and 4.16 (95% CI 3.32-5.00). Conclusion: the choice of an appropriate SARS-CoV 2 diagnostic, screening, and surveillance test should be guided by the specific study needs and a rational approach for optimal results.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing pathway using dried blood spot specimens
    Moat, Stuart J.
    Zelek, Wioleta M.
    Carne, Emily
    Ponsford, Mark J.
    Bramhall, Kathryn
    Jones, Sara
    El-Shanawany, Tariq
    Wise, Matt P.
    Thomas, Annette
    George, Chloe
    Fegan, Christopher
    Steven, Rachael
    Webb, Russell
    Weeks, Ian
    Morgan, B. Paul
    Jolles, Stephen
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 58 (02) : 123 - 131
  • [22] Detection profile of SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in different types of clinical specimens: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bwire, George M.
    Majigo, Mtebe, V
    Njiro, Belinda J.
    Mawazo, Akili
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (02) : 719 - 725
  • [23] Limited specificity of commercially available SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISAs in serum samples of African origin
    Emmerich, Petra
    Murawski, Carolin
    Ehmen, Christa
    von Possel, Ronald
    Pekarek, Neele
    Oestereich, Lisa
    Duraffour, Sophie
    Pahlmann, Meike
    Struck, Nicole
    Eibach, Daniel
    Krumkamp, Ralf
    Amuasi, John
    Maiga-Ascofare, Oumou
    Rakotozandrindrainy, Raphael
    Asogun, Danny
    Ighodalo, Yemisi
    Kann, Simone
    May, Juergen
    Tannich, Egbert
    Deschermeier, Christina
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2021, 26 (06) : 621 - 631
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Cultural and PCR Based Assays for Detection of Campylobacter spp. in Human Stool Samples
    Pallavi
    Kumar A.
    Kumar S.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2015, 85 (3) : 839 - 844
  • [25] Digital reverse transcription PCR using a simple poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwell array chip for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Hosokawa, Kazuo
    Ohmori, Hitoshi
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 741
  • [26] Assessment of the detection accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis
    Chen, Cheng-Chieh
    Lee, Mei-Hui
    Chen, Shih-Yen
    Lu, Shou-Cheng
    Bai, Chyi-Huey
    Ko, Yu-Ling
    Wang, Chien-Ying
    Wang, Yuan-Hung
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 86 (11) : 966 - 974
  • [27] A comparison of conventional and advanced electroanalytical methods to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus: A concise review
    Ganesh, Pattan-Siddappa
    Kim, Sang-Youn
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 307
  • [28] The diversification of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants and evaluation of their detection with molecular and rapid antigen assays
    Anderson, Mark
    Holzmayer, Vera
    Harris, Barbara
    Hodges, Austin
    Olivo, Ana
    Fortney, Tiffany
    Goldstein, Yitz
    Hirschhorn, Julie
    Pytel, Dariusz
    Faron, Matthew L.
    Cloherty, Gavin
    Rodgers, Mary A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [29] Sample pooling is a viable strategy for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low-prevalence settings
    Chong, Brian S. W.
    Tran, Thomas
    Druce, Julian
    Ballard, Susan A.
    Simpson, Julie A.
    Catton, Mike
    PATHOLOGY, 2020, 52 (07) : 796 - 800
  • [30] Three SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative cases of COVID-19 diagnosed using isothermal amplification methods
    Shinozawa, Saeko
    Moriyama, Yuki
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 28 (07) : 1005 - 1007