共 50 条
Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples
被引:0
|作者:
Oloo, Marceline Adhiambo
[1
]
Awandu, Shehu Shagari
[2
]
Onyango, Benson
[1
]
Magwanga, Richard Odongo
[1
]
Oluoch, Alfred Ochieng
[1
]
Lidechi, Shirley
[3
]
Muok, Erick Mbata
[3
]
Munga, Stephen
[3
]
Estambale, Benson
[2
]
机构:
[1] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Biol Phys Math & Actuarial Sci, POB 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya
[2] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, POB 210, Bondo 40601, Kenya
[3] Kenya Med Res Inst Ctr Global Hlth Res CGHR, POB 1578-40100, Kisumu, Kenya
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
immunoglobulin G;
immunoglobulin M;
polymerase chain reaction;
rapid antigen detection test;
Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2;
D O I:
10.11604/pamj.2023.46.21.39483
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Introduction: as a public health policy, the ongoing global coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination drives require continuous tracking, tracing, and testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diagnostic testing is important in virus detection and understanding its spread for timely intervention. This is especially important for low-income settings where the majority of the population remains untested. This is well supported by the fact that of about 9% of the Kenyan population had been tested for the virus. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Kisumu and Siaya Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Here we report on the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test (Ag-RDT) of SARS-CoV2 compared with the quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using stool and nasopharyngeal swab samples. Further, the mean Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in western Kenya were evaluated. Results: the sensitivity and specificity of Ag-RDT were 76.3% (95% CI, 59.8-88.6%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 87.399.5%) with a negative and positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI, 73.8%-93.0%) and 93% (95% CI, 78.6%-99.2%) respectively. There was substantial agreement of 88% (Kappa value of 0.75, 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) between Ag-RDT and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR, and between stool and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR results (83.7% agreement, Kapa value 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). The mean IgM and IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV2 were not different in asymptomatic individuals, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.78-1.44) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.651.11) compared to symptomatic individuals 4.30 (95% CI 3.30-5.31) and 4.16 (95% CI 3.32-5.00). Conclusion: the choice of an appropriate SARS-CoV 2 diagnostic, screening, and surveillance test should be guided by the specific study needs and a rational approach for optimal results.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文