Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 detection methods using stool, blood, and nasopharyngeal swab samples

被引:0
|
作者
Oloo, Marceline Adhiambo [1 ]
Awandu, Shehu Shagari [2 ]
Onyango, Benson [1 ]
Magwanga, Richard Odongo [1 ]
Oluoch, Alfred Ochieng [1 ]
Lidechi, Shirley [3 ]
Muok, Erick Mbata [3 ]
Munga, Stephen [3 ]
Estambale, Benson [2 ]
机构
[1] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Biol Phys Math & Actuarial Sci, POB 210-40601, Bondo, Kenya
[2] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hlth Sci, POB 210, Bondo 40601, Kenya
[3] Kenya Med Res Inst Ctr Global Hlth Res CGHR, POB 1578-40100, Kisumu, Kenya
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; immunoglobulin G; immunoglobulin M; polymerase chain reaction; rapid antigen detection test; Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2;
D O I
10.11604/pamj.2023.46.21.39483
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: as a public health policy, the ongoing global coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination drives require continuous tracking, tracing, and testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Diagnostic testing is important in virus detection and understanding its spread for timely intervention. This is especially important for low-income settings where the majority of the population remains untested. This is well supported by the fact that of about 9% of the Kenyan population had been tested for the virus. Methods: this was a cross-sectional study conducted at the Kisumu and Siaya Referral Hospitals in Kenya. Here we report on the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid antigen detection test (Ag-RDT) of SARS-CoV2 compared with the quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using stool and nasopharyngeal swab samples. Further, the mean Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels among symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in western Kenya were evaluated. Results: the sensitivity and specificity of Ag-RDT were 76.3% (95% CI, 59.8-88.6%) and 96.3% (95% CI, 87.399.5%) with a negative and positive predictive value of 85% (95% CI, 73.8%-93.0%) and 93% (95% CI, 78.6%-99.2%) respectively. There was substantial agreement of 88% (Kappa value of 0.75, 95% CI, 0.74-0.77) between Ag-RDT and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR, and between stool and nasopharyngeal swab RT-qPCR results (83.7% agreement, Kapa value 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.80). The mean IgM and IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV2 were not different in asymptomatic individuals, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.78-1.44) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.651.11) compared to symptomatic individuals 4.30 (95% CI 3.30-5.31) and 4.16 (95% CI 3.32-5.00). Conclusion: the choice of an appropriate SARS-CoV 2 diagnostic, screening, and surveillance test should be guided by the specific study needs and a rational approach for optimal results.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of nasopharyngeal samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a paediatric cohort
    Rodrigues, Jorge
    Gouveia, Catarina
    Santos, Madalena Almeida
    Costa, Olga
    Corte-Real, Rita
    Brito, Maria Joao
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2021, 57 (07) : 1078 - 1081
  • [2] Accuracy of rapid antigen detection test for nasopharyngeal swab specimens and saliva samples in comparison with RT-PCR and viral culture for SARS-CoV-2 detection
    Uwamino, Yoshifumi
    Nagata, Mika
    Aoki, Wataru
    Nakagawa, Terumichi
    Inose, Rika
    Yokota, Hiromitsu
    Furusawa, Yuri
    Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko
    Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Kiyoko
    Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
    Hasegawa, Naoki
    Murata, Mitsuru
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 1058 - 1062
  • [3] Conventional and Microfluidic Methods for the Detection of Nucleic Acid of SARS-CoV-2
    Song, Weidu
    Zhang, Taiyi
    Lin, Huichao
    Yang, Yujing
    Zhao, Gaozhen
    Huang, Xiaowen
    MICROMACHINES, 2022, 13 (04)
  • [4] Recent Developments in SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Detection Methods
    Jo-Lewis Banga Ndzouboukou
    Yan-di Zhang
    Xiong-lin Fan
    Current Medical Science, 2021, 41 : 1052 - 1064
  • [5] Recent Developments in SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Detection Methods
    Ndzouboukou, Jo-Lewis Banga
    Zhang, Yan-di
    Fan, Xiong-lin
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 41 (06) : 1052 - 1064
  • [6] Comparative analysis of the main haematological indexes and RNA detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Jialin Xiang
    Zuyi Chen
    Jie Zhou
    Di Tian
    Xiusheng Ran
    Zhimin Zhang
    Shi Shi
    Daimin Xiao
    Yuanzhong Zhou
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 20
  • [7] Comparative analysis of the main haematological indexes and RNA detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Xiang, Jialin
    Chen, Zuyi
    Zhou, Jie
    Tian, Di
    Ran, Xiusheng
    Zhang, Zhimin
    Shi, Shi
    Xiao, Daimin
    Zhou, Yuanzhong
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [8] Comparison of Saliva and Midturbinate Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Lai, Jianyu
    German, Jennifer
    Hong, Filbert
    Tai, S-H Sheldon
    McPhaul, Kathleen M.
    Milton, Donald K.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (02):
  • [9] Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Tests Using Nasal Samples to Diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic Patients
    Alqahtani, Manaf
    Abdulrahman, Abdulkarim
    Mustafa, Fathi
    Alawadhi, Abdulla I.
    Alalawi, Batool
    Mallah, Saad I.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 9
  • [10] Comparison of Dried Blood Spots and Venous Blood for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Population of Nursing Home Residents
    Meyers, Eline
    Heytens, Stefan
    Formukong, Asangwing
    Vercruysse, Hanne
    De Sutter, An
    Geens, Tom
    Hofkens, Kenneth
    Janssens, Heidi
    Nys, Eveline
    Padalko, Elizaveta
    Deschepper, Ellen
    Cools, Piet
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (02):