Mixture formation of OME3-5 and 1-Octanol in comparison with diesel-like Dodecane under ECN Spray A conditions

被引:2
作者
Strauss, Lukas [1 ]
Riess, Sebastian [1 ]
Wensing, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Professorship Fluid Syst Technol, Erlangen, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING-SWITZERLAND | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
mixture formation; e-fuel; fuel spray; OME; Octanol; Dodecane; ECN Spray A; POLYOXYMETHYLENE DIMETHYL ETHERS; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.3389/fmech.2023.1083658
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In order to be able to use the full potential of regenerative fuels, a comprehensive characterization is necessary to identify the differences between conventional fuels and regenerative fuels. In the current work, we compare OME3-5 and 1-Octanol with diesel-like Dodecane in terms of mixture formation under ECN Spray A conditions for single and multi-injection. To determine the mixtures, i.e., the mass distribution and the resulting air-fuel equivalence ratio, Naber and Siebers' model as well as Musculus and Kattke's model are used, which are based on experimental data. For this work, the mass flow rates and also the liquid and gaseous penetration depths of the fuel spray are measured. Results show that the mass ratios for the quasi-steady state of a single main injection for all three fuels are nearly the same, whereas the air-fuel equivalence ratios are very different. In addition, multiple injections are used to show that the fuel influences the opening and closing behavior of the injector. In the transient case of multiple injections, completely different mixtures result. In summary, it can be stated that OME3-5 and also 1-Octanol show a clearly different physio-chemical behavior from Dodecane and cannot simply be used as a drop-in fuel. Therefore, a simple exchange is not possible without major adaptations.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   MIXTURE FORMATION ANALYSIS OF POLYOXYMETHYLENETHER INJECTION [J].
Peter, A. ;
Siewert, B. ;
Riess, S. ;
Strauss, L. ;
Pastoetter, C. ;
Wensing, M. .
ATOMIZATION AND SPRAYS, 2020, 30 (11) :843-859
[22]  
Peter A., 2022, CHARAKTERISIERUNG GE
[23]  
Pickett LM, 2013, 2013240001 SAE, P2013, DOI [10.4271/2013-24-0001, DOI 10.4271/2013-24-0001]
[24]   Relationship Between Diesel Fuel Spray Vapor Penetration/Dispersion and Local Fuel Mixture Fraction [J].
Pickett, Lyle M. ;
Manin, Julien ;
Genzale, Caroline L. ;
Siebers, Dennis L. ;
Musculus, Mark P. B. ;
Idicheria, Cherian A. .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2011, 4 (01) :764-799
[25]   Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities [J].
Pickett, Lyle M. ;
Genzale, Caroline L. ;
Bruneaux, Gilles ;
Malbec, Louis-Marie ;
Hermant, Laurent ;
Christiansen, Caspar ;
Schramm, Jesper .
SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINES, 2010, 3 (02) :156-181
[26]  
Riess S., 2017, Einfluss von Kraftstoff und Abgasruckfuhrung auf Gemischbildung und Verbrennung von dieselmotorischen Sprays
[27]  
SASOL Germany GmbH, 2019, SAF DAT SHEET N DOD
[28]  
Schmidt P. R., 2016, FUTURE FUELS FVV FUE
[29]   From methanol to the oxygenated diesel fuel poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ether: An assessment of the production costs [J].
Schmitz, Niklas ;
Burger, Jakob ;
Stroefer, Eckhard ;
Hasse, Hans .
FUEL, 2016, 185 :67-72
[30]  
Siebers DL, 1999, SAE Trans, V108, P703, DOI [DOI 10.4271/1999-01-0528, 10.4271/1999-01-0528]