The effect of multi-material architecture on the ex vivo osteochondral integration of bioprinted constructs

被引:19
作者
Bedell, Matthew L. [1 ]
Wang, Ziwen [1 ]
Hogan, Katie J. [1 ,2 ]
Torres, Angelica L. [1 ]
Pearce, Hannah A. [1 ]
Chim, Letitia K. [1 ]
Grande-Allen, K. Jane [1 ]
Mikos, Antonios G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Bioengn, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Med Scientist Training Program, Houston, TX USA
[3] NIBIB, Ctr Engn Complex Tissues, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Rice Univ, POB 1892,MS-142, Houston, TX 77251 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bioprinting; Extrusion; Multi; -material; Gradient; Bioinks; Osteochondral; hMSC; Explant; Tissue integration; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; SYNOVIAL-FLUID; CHONDROCYTES; COCULTURE; MATRIX; REPAIR; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Extrusion bioprinted constructs for osteochondral tissue engineering were fabricated to study the effect of multi-material architecture on encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells' tissue-specific matrix de-position and integration into an ex vivo porcine osteochondral explant model. Two extrusion fiber archi-tecture groups with differing transition regions and degrees of bone-and cartilage-like bioink mixing were employed. The gradient fiber (G-Fib) architecture group showed an increase in chondral integration over time, 18.5 +/- 0.7 kPa on Day 21 compared to 9.6 +/- 1.6 kPa on Day 1 for the required peak push-out force, and the segmented fiber (S-Fib) architecture group did not, which corresponded to the increase in sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposition noted only in the G-Fib group and the staining for cellularity and tissue-specific matrix deposition at the fiber-defect boundary. Conversely, the S-Fib architecture was as-sociated with significant mineralization over time, but the G-Fib architecture was not. Notably, both fiber groups also had similar chondral integration as a re-inserted osteochondral tissue control. While archi-tecture did dictate differences in the cells' responses to their environment, architecture was not shown to distinguish a statistically significant difference in tissue integration via fiber push-out testing within a given time point or explant region. Use of this three-week osteochondral model demonstrates that these bioink formulations support the fabrication of cell-laden constructs that integrate into explanted tissue as capably as natural tissue and encapsulate osteochondral matrix-producing cells, and it also highlights the important role that spatial architecture plays in the engineering of multi-phasic tissue environments.Statement of significance Here, an ex vivo model was used to interrogate fundamental questions about the effect of multi-material scaffold architectural choices on osteochondral tissue integration. Cell-encapsulating constructs resem-bling stratified osteochondral tissue were 3D printed with architecture consisting of either gradient tran-sitions or segmented transitions between the bone-like and cartilage-like bioink regions. The printed con-structs were assessed alongside re-inserted natural tissue plugs via mechanical tissue integration push-out testing, biochemical assays, and histology. Differences in osteochondral matrix deposition were ob-served based on architecture, and both printed groups demonstrated cartilage integration similar to the native tissue plug group. As 3D printing becomes commonplace within biomaterials and tissue engineer-ing, this work illustrates critical 3D co-culture interactions and demonstrates the importance of consider-ing architecture when interpreting the results of studies utilizing spatially complex, multi-material scaf-folds.(c) 2022 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 112
页数:14
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs [J].
Ashammakhi, N. ;
Ahadian, S. ;
Xu, C. ;
Montazerian, H. ;
Ko, H. ;
Nasiri, R. ;
Barros, N. ;
Khademhosseini, A. .
MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2019, 1
[2]  
Bedell M L., 2020, Principles of Tissue Engineering, P295, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818422-6.00018-6, 10.1016/B978-0-12-818422-6.00018-6]
[3]   Human gelatin-based composite hydrogels for osteochondral tissue engineering and their adaptation into bioinks for extrusion, inkjet, and digital light processing bioprinting [J].
Bedell, Matthew L. ;
Torres, Angelica L. ;
Hogan, Katie J. ;
Wang, Ziwen ;
Wang, Bonnie ;
Melchiorri, Anthony J. ;
Grande-Allen, K. Jane ;
Mikos, Antonios G. .
BIOFABRICATION, 2022, 14 (04)
[4]  
Bedell Matthew L., 2020, Bioprinting, V17, pe00068, DOI 10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00068
[5]   Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting [J].
Bedell, Matthew L. ;
Navara, Adam M. ;
Du, Yingying ;
Zhang, Shengmin ;
Mikos, Antonios G. .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2020, 120 (19) :10547-10595
[6]   Forms, forces, and stem cell fate [J].
Bellas, Evangelia ;
Chen, Christopher S. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2014, 31 :92-97
[7]  
Bittner Sean M., 2018, Bioprinting, V12, pe00032, DOI 10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00032
[8]   Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering [J].
Bittner, Sean M. ;
Smith, Brandon T. ;
Diaz-Gomez, Luis ;
Hudgins, Carrigan D. ;
Melchiorri, Anthony J. ;
Scott, David W. ;
Fisher, John P. ;
Mikos, Antonios G. .
ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2019, 90 :37-48
[9]   Three-dimensional printing of multilayered tissue engineering scaffolds [J].
Bittner, Sean M. ;
Guo, Jason L. ;
Melchiorri, Anthony ;
Mikos, Antonios G. .
MATERIALS TODAY, 2018, 21 (08) :861-874
[10]   Accomplishments and challenges in stem cell imaging in vivo [J].
Bose, Rajendran J. C. ;
Mattrey, Robert F. .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2019, 24 (02) :492-504