The effect of multi-material architecture on the ex vivo osteochondral integration of bioprinted constructs

被引:13
作者
Bedell, Matthew L. [1 ]
Wang, Ziwen [1 ]
Hogan, Katie J. [1 ,2 ]
Torres, Angelica L. [1 ]
Pearce, Hannah A. [1 ]
Chim, Letitia K. [1 ]
Grande-Allen, K. Jane [1 ]
Mikos, Antonios G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Dept Bioengn, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Med Scientist Training Program, Houston, TX USA
[3] NIBIB, Ctr Engn Complex Tissues, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Rice Univ, POB 1892,MS-142, Houston, TX 77251 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bioprinting; Extrusion; Multi; -material; Gradient; Bioinks; Osteochondral; hMSC; Explant; Tissue integration; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; ARTICULAR-CARTILAGE; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; SYNOVIAL-FLUID; CHONDROCYTES; COCULTURE; MATRIX; REPAIR; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Extrusion bioprinted constructs for osteochondral tissue engineering were fabricated to study the effect of multi-material architecture on encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells' tissue-specific matrix de-position and integration into an ex vivo porcine osteochondral explant model. Two extrusion fiber archi-tecture groups with differing transition regions and degrees of bone-and cartilage-like bioink mixing were employed. The gradient fiber (G-Fib) architecture group showed an increase in chondral integration over time, 18.5 +/- 0.7 kPa on Day 21 compared to 9.6 +/- 1.6 kPa on Day 1 for the required peak push-out force, and the segmented fiber (S-Fib) architecture group did not, which corresponded to the increase in sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposition noted only in the G-Fib group and the staining for cellularity and tissue-specific matrix deposition at the fiber-defect boundary. Conversely, the S-Fib architecture was as-sociated with significant mineralization over time, but the G-Fib architecture was not. Notably, both fiber groups also had similar chondral integration as a re-inserted osteochondral tissue control. While archi-tecture did dictate differences in the cells' responses to their environment, architecture was not shown to distinguish a statistically significant difference in tissue integration via fiber push-out testing within a given time point or explant region. Use of this three-week osteochondral model demonstrates that these bioink formulations support the fabrication of cell-laden constructs that integrate into explanted tissue as capably as natural tissue and encapsulate osteochondral matrix-producing cells, and it also highlights the important role that spatial architecture plays in the engineering of multi-phasic tissue environments.Statement of significance Here, an ex vivo model was used to interrogate fundamental questions about the effect of multi-material scaffold architectural choices on osteochondral tissue integration. Cell-encapsulating constructs resem-bling stratified osteochondral tissue were 3D printed with architecture consisting of either gradient tran-sitions or segmented transitions between the bone-like and cartilage-like bioink regions. The printed con-structs were assessed alongside re-inserted natural tissue plugs via mechanical tissue integration push-out testing, biochemical assays, and histology. Differences in osteochondral matrix deposition were ob-served based on architecture, and both printed groups demonstrated cartilage integration similar to the native tissue plug group. As 3D printing becomes commonplace within biomaterials and tissue engineer-ing, this work illustrates critical 3D co-culture interactions and demonstrates the importance of consider-ing architecture when interpreting the results of studies utilizing spatially complex, multi-material scaf-folds.(c) 2022 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 112
页数:14
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [1] Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs
    Ashammakhi, N.
    Ahadian, S.
    Xu, C.
    Montazerian, H.
    Ko, H.
    Nasiri, R.
    Barros, N.
    Khademhosseini, A.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY BIO, 2019, 1
  • [2] Human gelatin-based composite hydrogels for osteochondral tissue engineering and their adaptation into bioinks for extrusion, inkjet, and digital light processing bioprinting
    Bedell, Matthew L.
    Torres, Angelica L.
    Hogan, Katie J.
    Wang, Ziwen
    Wang, Bonnie
    Melchiorri, Anthony J.
    Grande-Allen, K. Jane
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    [J]. BIOFABRICATION, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [3] Bedell Matthew L., 2020, Bioprinting, V17, pe00068, DOI 10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00068
  • [4] Polymeric Systems for Bioprinting
    Bedell, Matthew L.
    Navara, Adam M.
    Du, Yingying
    Zhang, Shengmin
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2020, 120 (19) : 10547 - 10595
  • [5] Bedell MatthewL., 2020, Principles of Tissue Engineering, VFifth, P295, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-818422-6.00018-6
  • [6] Forms, forces, and stem cell fate
    Bellas, Evangelia
    Chen, Christopher S.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2014, 31 : 92 - 97
  • [7] Bittner Sean M., 2018, Bioprinting, V12, pe00032, DOI 10.1016/j.bprint.2018.e00032
  • [8] Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering
    Bittner, Sean M.
    Smith, Brandon T.
    Diaz-Gomez, Luis
    Hudgins, Carrigan D.
    Melchiorri, Anthony J.
    Scott, David W.
    Fisher, John P.
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    [J]. ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2019, 90 : 37 - 48
  • [9] Three-dimensional printing of multilayered tissue engineering scaffolds
    Bittner, Sean M.
    Guo, Jason L.
    Melchiorri, Anthony
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2018, 21 (08) : 861 - 874
  • [10] Accomplishments and challenges in stem cell imaging in vivo
    Bose, Rajendran J. C.
    Mattrey, Robert F.
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2019, 24 (02) : 492 - 504