Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on Disability-A Systematic Review

被引:12
|
作者
Potcovaru, Claudia-Gabriela [1 ]
Salmen, Teodor [1 ]
Bigu, Dragos [2 ]
Sandulescu, Miruna Ioana [1 ]
Filip, Petruta Violeta [3 ]
Diaconu, Laura Sorina [3 ]
Pop, Corina [3 ]
Ciobanu, Ileana [4 ]
Cinteza, Delia [5 ]
Berteanu, Mihai [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davila, Doctoral Sch, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Dept Philosophy & Social & Human Sci, Piata Romana 6, Dist 1, Bucharest 010374, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davila, Dept Gastroenterol & Internal Med, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[4] Elias Univ Emergency Hosp, Phys & Rehabil Med Dept, Bucharest 011461, Romania
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Carol Davila, Phys Med & Rehabil Dept 9, Bucharest 050474, Romania
关键词
disability; WHODAS; 2.0; ICF; rehabilitation interventions; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION; TELEREHABILITATION; INDIVIDUALS; EXERCISE; PEOPLE; PAIN; TIME;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13051252
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
(1) Background: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a tool designed to measure disability in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Measuring disability is becoming increasingly important due to its high prevalence, which continues to rise. Rehabilitation interventions can reduce disability and enhance functioning. (2) Objective: The present study aims to assess the impact of rehabilitation interventions on reducing disability, as measured by the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire. It also seeks to identify which specific rehabilitation interventions are more effective and to explore other disability assessment questionnaires. (3) Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a systematic review, with the protocol registered with the identifier CRD42023495309, focused on "WHODAS" and "rehabilitation" using PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases. (4) Results: We identified 18 articles from various regions encompassing patients with various health conditions, related to stroke, the cardiovascular system (cardiovascular disease, chronic heart failure), the pulmonary system (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), the neurologic system (Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, neurodegenerative disease), the musculoskeletal system (orthopaedic surgery), cancer, and chronic pain, and among frail elderly. These patients have received a wide range of rehabilitation interventions: from conventional therapy to virtual reality, robot-assisted arm training, exergaming, and telerehabilitation. (5) Discussion and Conclusions: A wide range of rehabilitation techniques can effectively improve disability with various comorbidities, offering numerous benefits. The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire proves to be an efficient and reliable tool for measuring disability, and scores have a tendency to decrease after rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Rasch analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a mild traumatic brain injury sample
    Snell, Deborah L.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Silverberg, Noah D.
    BRAIN INJURY, 2020, 34 (05) : 610 - 618
  • [42] Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls
    Kunt, Duygu Aslan
    Dereboy, Ferhan
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2018, 29 (04) : 147 - 155
  • [43] Functioning and Disability Analysis of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury by Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Kuo, Chia-Ying
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    Chang, Kwang-Hwa
    Chi, Wen-Chou
    Escorpizo, Reuben
    Yen, Chia-Feng
    Liao, Hua-Fang
    Chiou, Hung-Yi
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    Tsai, Jo-Ting
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 12 (04): : 4116 - 4127
  • [44] Disability in bipolar I disorder: Application of Mokken scaling analysis and the graded response model to the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
    Gomez-Benito, Juana
    Abdelhamid, Gomaa S. M.
    Pino, Oscar
    Rojo, Emilio
    Vieta, Eduard
    Guilera, Georgina
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 260 : 506 - 513
  • [45] VALIDATION OF THE "WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE, WHODAS-II"
    Garin, O.
    Nieto-Moreno, M.
    Almansa, J.
    Vilagut, G.
    Villalonga-Olives, E.
    Alonso, J.
    Valderas, J. M.
    Ayuso, J. L.
    Ferrer, M.
    GACETA SANITARIA, 2009, 23 : 53 - 54
  • [46] A note on the theoretical framework of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II
    Federici, Stefano
    Meloni, Fabio
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (08) : 687 - 691
  • [47] Health and disability - a multi-group latent class analysis of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among those with mental and physical health conditions
    Seet, Vanessa
    Abdin, Edimansyah
    Jeyagurunathan, Anitha
    Chik, Tan Sing
    Kit, Lum Joon
    Sing, Lee Eng
    Verma, Swapna
    Ker-Chiah, Wei
    Ng, Pamela
    Subramaniam, Mythily
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [48] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Carlozzi, Noelle E.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    Downing, Nancy R.
    Goodnight, Siera
    Miner, Jennifer A.
    Migliore, Nicholas
    Paulsen, Jane S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1963 - 1971
  • [49] Validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with Huntington disease (HD)
    Noelle E. Carlozzi
    Anna L. Kratz
    Nancy R. Downing
    Siera Goodnight
    Jennifer A. Miner
    Nicholas Migliore
    Jane S. Paulsen
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1963 - 1971
  • [50] Age-related differences in psychometric properties of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0): a retrospective analysis
    Karsikas, Mika
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Juhola, Juhani
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (04) : 276 - 281