Does ozaki procedure have a future as a new surgical approach for aortic valve replacement? a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Awad, Ahmed K. [1 ,2 ]
Farahat, Ramadan A. [4 ]
Gad, Eman Reda [3 ]
Abdelgalil, Mahmoud Shaban [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Hassaballa, Aly Sherif [2 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Cardiothorac Surg Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[3] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Cairo, Egypt
[4] Kafrelsheikh Univ, Fac Med, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
[5] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Cairo 11865, Egypt
来源
ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY | 2023年 / 85卷 / 09期
关键词
aortic valve; meta-analysis; Ozaki procedure; review; PULMONARY AUTOGRAFT; AUTOLOGOUS PERICARDIUM; CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY; STENOSIS; RECONSTRUCTION; CHILDREN; SOCIETY; DISEASE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/MS9.0000000000000982
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In 2014, Ozaki et al. introduced the neo-cuspidation (Ozaki procedure), a new valve from the pericardium, to reduce or even prevent the risk of chronic autoimmune inflammation and subsequent rejection or valve degeneration. Thus, the authors aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the Ozaki technique in treating aortic valve diseases. Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was performed via PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and the Web of Science up to 20 February 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis models were employed to estimate the pooled mean and SD or event to the total of the Ozaki procedure. Relevant records were retrieved and analyzed by OpenMeta analyst software. Results: A total of 2863 patients from 21 studies were finally included in our analysis. Ac. Ozaki technique showed statistical significance in terms of mean cardiopulmonary bypass time of 148 mins (95% CI 144-152.2, P< 0.001), mean aortic cross-clamp time of 112.46 mins (95% CI 105.116, 119.823, P < 0.001), reoperation with a low risk of 0.011 (95% CI 0.005, 0.016, P = 0.047), conversion to aortic valve replacement with a low risk of 0.004 (95% CI - 0.001, 0.008, P = 0.392), finally ICU stay (days) and hospital length of stay (days) with a mean of 2.061 days (95% CI 1.535, 2.587, P < 0.001) and 8.159 days (95% CI 7.183-9.855, P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: The Ozaki procedure provides a safe surgical technique with low mean cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross clamp time; moreover, a mean of 2-day-postoperative hospital stay was observed with the Ozaki procedure with a low risk of conversion to aortic valve replacement, reoperation, ICU and hospital stay, and death.
引用
收藏
页码:4454 / 4462
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kevin S.
    Makhdoum, Ahmad
    Koziarz, Alex
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Alsagheir, Ali
    Pandey, Arjun
    Reza, Seleman
    Um, Kevin
    Teoh, Kevin
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Lamy, Andre
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (12) : 4734 - 4742
  • [32] Cardiac rehabilitation programme after transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ribeiro, Gustavo S.
    Melo, Rosangela D.
    Deresz, Luis F.
    Dal Lago, Pedro
    Pontes, Mauro R. N.
    Karsten, Marlus
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 688 - 697
  • [33] Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Previous Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Yi-ming
    Tsauo, Jia-yu
    Jia, Kai-yu
    Liao, Yan-biao
    Xia, Fan
    Zhao, Zheng-gang
    Chen, Mao
    Peng, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 7
  • [34] Incidence of aortic valve reintervention in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Groberio, Julia Goese
    Reginato, Pedro Henrique
    Streit, Rafael Eduardo
    Rocha, Alice Volpato
    Udoma-Udofa, Ofonime Chantal
    de Mesquita, Cynthia Florencio
    Rivera, Andre
    Ulbrich, Anderson Zampier
    Farias, Fabio Rocha
    Gomes, Wilton Francisco
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 73 (01) : 12 - 22
  • [35] Acute Kidney Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Srivali, Narat
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    Kittanamongkolchai, Wonngarm
    Greason, Kevin L.
    Kashani, Kianoush B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 41 (4-5) : 372 - 382
  • [36] Minimally invasive surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sayed, Ahmed
    Almotawally, Salma
    Wilson, Karim
    Munir, Malak
    Bendary, Ahmed
    Ramzy, Ahmed
    Hirji, Sameer
    Ibrahim Abushouk, Abdelrahman
    OPEN HEART, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [37] Comparison of Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score Matching
    Liu, Shidong
    Chen, Hao
    Zhou, Wenjun
    Zhao, Pengying
    Qi, Liang
    Zhang, Yalan
    Song, Bing
    Yu, Cuntao
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (11)
  • [38] Incidence and Predictors of Structural Valve Deterioration after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Long, Yu-Xiang
    Liu, Zeng-Zhang
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [39] Meta-analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk
    Witberg, Guy
    Landes, Uri
    Lador, Adi
    Yahav, Dafna
    Kornowski, Ran
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2019, 15 (12) : E1047 - +
  • [40] A Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
    Takagi, Hisato
    Niwa, Masao
    Mizuno, Yusuke
    Goto, Shin-nosuke
    Umemoto, Takuya
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 96 (02) : 513 - 519