Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients at 30 days: a propensity score matching study

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chen [1 ]
Jiang, Yefan [2 ]
Wang, Qingpeng [3 ]
Wang, Dashuai [1 ]
Jiang, Xionggang [1 ]
Dong, Nianguo [1 ]
Chen, Si [1 ]
Chen, Xinzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary artery bypass grafting; off-pump; on-pump; elderly; propensity score matching; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; MORTALITY; REVASCULARIZATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TERM;
D O I
10.1093/postmj/qgad120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG). This study was to determine whether such high-risk population would benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients aged 65 years or older who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for the first time in Wuhan Union Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021. We used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the ONCABG and OPCABG groups. Morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery were compared between the two groups. All operations were performed by experienced cardiac surgeons.Results A total of 511 patients (ONCABG 202, OPCABG 309) were included. After 1:1 matching, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (ONCABG 173, OPCABG 173). The OPCABG group had higher rate of incomplete revascularization (13.9% vs. 6.9%; P = .035) than the ONCABG group. However, OPCABG reduced the risk of postoperative renal insufficiency (15.0% vs. 30.1%; P = .001) and reoperation for bleeding (0.0% vs. 3.5%; P = .030). There were no significant differences in early postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other outcomes between the two groups.Conclusions OPCABG is an alternative revascularization method for elderly patients. It reduces the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding. What is already known on this topic Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. What this study adds Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding in elderly patients. How this study might affect research, practice or policy The study showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is an alternative surgical method for revascularization in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. It can provide data support for clinicians to select off-pump procedure for elderly patients and facilitate clinical decision-making, outcome assessment, and quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Atrial fibrillation following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Incidence and risk factors
    Lewicki, Lukasz
    Siebert, Janusz
    Rogowski, Jan
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (05) : 518 - 523
  • [42] On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Cohort of 63,000 Patients
    Chu, Danny
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    Dao, Tam K.
    LeMaire, Scott A.
    Coselli, Joseph S.
    Huh, Joseph
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 87 (06) : 1820 - 1827
  • [43] Risk factors and clinical significance of acute kidney injury after on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity score-matched study
    Li, Zhiwei
    Fan, Guoliang
    Zheng, Xiaorong
    Gong, Xiaowen
    Chen, Tienan
    Liu, Xiaocheng
    Jia, Kegang
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 28 (06) : 893 - 899
  • [44] Off-pump versus on-pump complete coronary artery bypass grafting Comparison of the effects on the renal damage in patients with renal dysfunction
    Arslan, Umit
    Calik, Eyupserhat
    Tekin, Ali Ihsan
    Erkut, Bilgehan
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (35)
  • [45] Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk
    Polomsky, Marek
    He, Xia
    O'Brien, Sean M.
    Puskas, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (05) : 1193 - 1198
  • [46] Analysis of immediate results of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
    Cantero, Marcos Antonio
    Almeida, Rui M. S.
    Galhardo, Roberto
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIRURGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2012, 27 (01): : 38 - 44
  • [47] Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Beating Heart Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Matsuhashi, Kazuki
    Takami, Yoshiyuki
    Maekawa, Atsuo
    Yamana, Koji
    Akita, Kiyotoshi
    Amano, Kentaro
    Takagi, Yasushi
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2024, 72 (06) : 449 - 455
  • [48] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cappellaro, Anelise Poluboiarinov
    de Almeida, Luiz F. Costa
    Pinto, Manoela Lenzi
    Martins, Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa
    Sousa, Augusto Graziani e
    Gadelha, Julia Goncalves
    Vieira, Ana Carolina Putini
    Rocha, Luis Fernando Rosati
    Thet, Myat Soe
    GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2025, 73 (04) : 201 - 208
  • [49] Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Octogenarians: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Survival
    Lee, Daniel C.
    Ramirez, Sergio A.
    Bacchetta, Matthew
    Borer, Jeffrey S.
    Ko, Wilson
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 125 (03) : 164 - 169
  • [50] The Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation after On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Arslan, Gokhan
    Erol, Gokhan
    Kartal, Hakan
    Demirdas, Ertan
    Bolcal, Cengiz
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2021, 24 (04) : E645 - E650