Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly patients at 30 days: a propensity score matching study

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Chen [1 ]
Jiang, Yefan [2 ]
Wang, Qingpeng [3 ]
Wang, Dashuai [1 ]
Jiang, Xionggang [1 ]
Dong, Nianguo [1 ]
Chen, Si [1 ]
Chen, Xinzhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430062, Peoples R China
关键词
coronary artery bypass grafting; off-pump; on-pump; elderly; propensity score matching; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; MORTALITY; REVASCULARIZATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TERM;
D O I
10.1093/postmj/qgad120
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG). This study was to determine whether such high-risk population would benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients aged 65 years or older who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting for the first time in Wuhan Union Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021. We used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the ONCABG and OPCABG groups. Morbidity and mortality within 30 days after surgery were compared between the two groups. All operations were performed by experienced cardiac surgeons.Results A total of 511 patients (ONCABG 202, OPCABG 309) were included. After 1:1 matching, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable (ONCABG 173, OPCABG 173). The OPCABG group had higher rate of incomplete revascularization (13.9% vs. 6.9%; P = .035) than the ONCABG group. However, OPCABG reduced the risk of postoperative renal insufficiency (15.0% vs. 30.1%; P = .001) and reoperation for bleeding (0.0% vs. 3.5%; P = .030). There were no significant differences in early postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and other outcomes between the two groups.Conclusions OPCABG is an alternative revascularization method for elderly patients. It reduces the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding. What is already known on this topic Elderly patients are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. What this study adds Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduced the risk of early postoperative renal insufficiency and reoperation for bleeding in elderly patients. How this study might affect research, practice or policy The study showed that off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is an alternative surgical method for revascularization in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. It can provide data support for clinicians to select off-pump procedure for elderly patients and facilitate clinical decision-making, outcome assessment, and quality improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 420
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on myocardial metabolism
    Xie, Hong-tao
    Kang, Xiao-qin
    Zhang, Shun
    Tian, Yong-cang
    Liu, De-jun
    Bai, Ben-jian
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (17)
  • [32] Early outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Hussain, Ghulam
    Azam, Hammad
    Baig, Mirza Ahmad Raza
    Ahmad, Naseem
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (04) : 917 - 921
  • [33] OFF-PUMP VERSUS ON-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING: WHO BENEFITS?
    Pawliszak, Wojciech
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    Anisimowicz, Lech
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (06) : 1666 - 1668
  • [34] Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-weighted analysis on the impact of on-pump versus off-pump strategies
    Kim, Ho Jin
    Kim, Joon Bum
    Jung, Sung-Ho
    Choo, Suk Jung
    Lee, Jae Won
    Chung, Cheol Hyun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (05) : 937 - 944
  • [35] Coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump or on-pump: another brick in the wall
    Calafiore, Antonio M.
    Prapas, Sotirios
    Osman, Ahmed
    Di Mauro, Michele
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (07)
  • [36] Late outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass in patients with diabetes: A nationwide study from Taiwan
    Huang, Kuan-Chih
    Wu, I-Hui
    Chou, Nai-Kuan
    Yang, Yen-Yun
    Lin, Lung-Chun
    Yu, Hsi-Yu
    Chi, Nai-Hsin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 157 (03) : 960 - +
  • [37] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a surreal controversy?
    Kundu A.
    Yadava O.P.
    Taggart D.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (Suppl 3) : 266 - 271
  • [38] Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in moderate renal failure
    Rocha, Rodolfo, V
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Hussain, Mohamad A.
    Tu, Jack, V
    Fang, Jiming
    Ouzounian, Maral
    Cusimano, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 159 (04) : 1297 - 1303
  • [39] The outcome of patients requiring emergency conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
    Landoni, G.
    Pappalardo, F.
    Crescenzi, G.
    Aletti, G.
    Marchetti, C.
    Poli, D.
    Franco, A.
    Rosica, C.
    Zangrillo, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (04) : 317 - 322
  • [40] On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left main stem disease: A propensity score analysis
    Murzi, Michele
    Caputo, Massimo
    Aresu, Giuseppe
    Duggan, Simon
    Miceli, Antonio
    Glauber, Mattia
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (06) : 1382 - 1388