18F-FDG PET/MRI for restaging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

被引:1
|
作者
Valkema, Maria J. [1 ]
de la Sabloniere, Quido G. de Lussanet [2 ]
Valkema, Roelf [2 ]
Thomeer, Maarten G. J. [2 ]
Dwarkasing, Roy S. [2 ]
Harteveld, Anita A. [2 ]
Doukas, Michail [3 ]
Mostert, Bianca [4 ]
van der Zijden, Charlene J. [1 ]
van der Sluis, Pieter C. [1 ]
Lagarde, Sjoerd M. [1 ]
Wijnhoven, Bas P. L. [1 ]
Verburg, Frederik A. [2 ]
van Lanschot, J. Jan B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Rg 229k,POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
F-18-FDG PET/MRI; F-18-FDG PET/CT; active surveillance; esophageal cancer; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; PROTOCOL; SURGERY; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1097/MNM.0000000000001793
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) PET/MRI may potentially improve tumor detection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer.Methods This was a prospective, single-center feasibility study. At 6-12 weeks after nCRT, patients underwent standard F-18-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) followed by PET/MRI, and completed a questionnaire to evaluate burden. Two teams of readers either assessed the F-18-FDG PET/CT or the F-18-FDG PET/MRI first; the other scan was assessed 1 month later. Maximum standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC(mean)) were measured at the primary tumor location. Histopathology of the surgical resection specimen served as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy calculations. When patients had a clinically complete response and continued active surveillance, response evaluations until 9 months after nCRT served as a proxy for ypT and ypN (i.e. 'ycT' and 'ycN').Results In the 21 included patients [median age 70 (IQR 62-75), 16 males], disease recurrence was found in the primary tumor in 14 (67%) patients (of whom one ypM+, detected on both scans) and in locoregional lymph nodes in six patients (29%). Accuracy (team 1/team 2) to detect yp/ycT+ with F-18-FDG PET/MRI vs. F-18-FDG PET/CT was 38/57% vs. 76/61%. For ypN+, accuracy was 63/53% vs. 63/42%, resp. Neither SULmax (both scans) nor ADC(mean) were discriminatory for yp/ycT+ . Fourteen of 21 (67%) patients were willing to undergo a similar F-18-FDG PET/MRI examination in the future.Conclusion F-18-FDG PET/MRI currently performs comparably to F-18-FDG PET/CT. Improvements in the scanning protocol, increasing reader experience and performing serial scans might contribute to enhancing the accuracy of tumor detection after nCRT using F-18-FDG PET/MRI.Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NL9352.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 138
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer
    Kubiessa, K.
    Purz, S.
    Gawlitza, M.
    Kuehn, A.
    Fuchs, J.
    Steinhoff, K. G.
    Boehm, A.
    Sabri, O.
    Kluge, R.
    Kahn, T.
    Stumpp, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (04) : 639 - 648
  • [32] 18F-FDG PET Response After Induction Chemotherapy Can Predict Who Will Benefit from Subsequent Esophagectomy After Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Xi, Mian
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Ho, Linus
    Lin, Steven H.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (11) : 1756 - 1763
  • [33] Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer
    K. Kubiessa
    S. Purz
    M. Gawlitza
    A. Kühn
    J. Fuchs
    K. G. Steinhoff
    A. Boehm
    O. Sabri
    R. Kluge
    T. Kahn
    P. Stumpp
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014, 41 : 639 - 648
  • [34] 18F-FDG PET/MRI Image of Skin Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer
    Kibar, Ali
    Asa, Sertac
    Besli, Rabia Lebriz Uslu
    Sager, Muhammet Sait
    Sonmezoglu, Kerim
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY, 2023, 32 (02) : 159 - 161
  • [35] 18F-FDG-PET/CT in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Ur Metser
    Farid Rashidi
    Hadas Moshonov
    Rebecca Wong
    Jennifer Knox
    Maha Guindi
    Gail Darling
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2014, 28 : 295 - 303
  • [36] 18F-FDG-PET/CT in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer
    Metser, Ur
    Rashidi, Farid
    Moshonov, Hadas
    Wong, Rebecca
    Knox, Jennifer
    Guindi, Maha
    Darling, Gail
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (04) : 295 - 303
  • [37] Role of F18-FDG PET/CT in the Staging and Restaging of Esophageal Cancer: A Comparison with CECT
    Kumar P.
    Damle N.A.
    Bal C.
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 2 (4) : 343 - 350
  • [38] 18F-FDG PET/CT in Restaging and Evaluation of Response to Therapy in Lung Cancer: State of the Art
    Castello, Angelo
    Rossi, Sabrina
    Lopci, Egesta
    CURRENT RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2020, 13 (03) : 228 - 237
  • [39] Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as predictor of the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer A retrospective study
    Domachevsky, Liran
    Kashtan, Hanoch
    Brenner, Baruch
    Nidam, Meital
    Morgenstern, Sara
    Kundel, Yulia
    Groshar, David
    Bernstine, Hanna
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (49)
  • [40] Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for thoracic staging of non-small cell lung cancer
    Julian Kirchner
    Lino M. Sawicki
    Felix Nensa
    Benedikt M. Schaarschmidt
    Henning Reis
    Marc Ingenwerth
    Simon Bogner
    Clemens Aigner
    Christian Buchbender
    Lale Umutlu
    Gerald Antoch
    Ken Herrmann
    Philipp Heusch
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2019, 46 : 437 - 445