Clinical efficacy and satisfaction of a digital wheeze detector in a multicentre randomised controlled trial: the WheezeScan study

被引:6
作者
Yen Hoang Do [1 ]
van Aalderen, Wim [2 ]
Dellbruegger, Ellen
Grenzbach, Claude
Grigg, Jonathan [3 ]
Grittner, Ulrike [4 ]
Haarman, Eric [2 ]
Toro, Camilo Jose Hernandez [1 ,4 ]
Karadag, Bulent [5 ]
Rossberg, Siri
Weichert, Tina-Maria
Whitehouse, Abigail [3 ]
Pizzulli, Antonio
Matricardi, Paolo Maria [1 ]
Dramburg, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Pediat Resp Med Immunol & Crit Care Med, Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Emma Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Resp Med & Allergy, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Genom & Child Hlth, Blizard Inst, London, England
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Biometry & Clin Epidemiol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Marmara Univ, Div Pediat Pulmonol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CHILDREN; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1183/23120541.00518-2023
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Wheezing is common in preschool children and its clinical assessment often challenging for caretakers. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a novel digital wheeze detector (WheezeScanT) on disease control in a home care setting. Methods A multicentre randomised open-label controlled trial was conducted in Berlin, Istanbul and London. Participants aged 4-84 months with a doctor's diagnosis of recurrent wheezing in the past 12 months were included. While the control group followed usual care, the intervention group received the WheezeScanT for at-home use for 120 days. Parents completed questionnaires regarding their child's respiratory symptoms, disease-related and parental quality of life, and caretaker self-efficacy at baseline (T0), 90 days (T1) and 4 months (T2). Results A total of 167 children, with a mean +/- SD age of 3.2 +/- 1.6 years, were enrolled in the study (intervention group n=87; control group n=80). There was no statistically significant difference in wheeze control assessed by TRACK (mean difference 3.8, 95% CI -2.3-9.9; p=0.2) at T1 between treatment groups ( primary outcome). Children's and parental quality of life and parental self-efficacy were comparable between both groups at T1. The evaluation of device usability and perception showed that parents found it useful. Conclusion In the current study population, the wheeze detector did not show significant impact on the home management of preschool wheezing. Hence, further research is needed to better understand how the perception and usage behaviour may influence the clinical impact of a digital support.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stepped care for depression and anxiety in visually impaired older adults: multicentre randomised controlled trial
    van der Aa, Hilde P. A.
    van Rens, Ger H. M. B.
    Comijs, Hannie C.
    Margrain, Tom H.
    Gallindo-Garre, Francisca
    Twisk, Jos W. R.
    van Nispen, Ruth M. A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
  • [22] Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acupuncture with Doin therapy for chronic neck pain: a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial
    Lee, Sook-Hyun
    Lee, Jinho
    Lee, Yoon Jae
    Kim, Me-riong
    Cho, Jae Heung
    Kim, Koh-Woon
    Ha, In-Hyuk
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [23] Efficacy of natural enzymes mouthwash: a randomised controlled trial
    Chiam, Thao Liang
    Choo, Jowayne
    Ashar, Atika
    Hussaini, Haizal Mohd
    Rajandram, Rama Krsna
    Nordin, Rifqah
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (05)
  • [24] Equine-assisted biographical work (EABW) with individuals in the second half of life: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Schmidt, Julia
    Wartenberg-Demand, Andrea
    Forstmeier, Simon
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [25] BREAST trial study protocol: evaluation of a non-invasive technique for breast reconstruction in a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Schop, Sander S. J.
    Hommes, Juliette E.
    Krastev, Todor K.
    Derks, Danielle
    Larsen, Mikko
    Rakhorst, HInne
    Schmidbauer, Ute
    Smit, Jan Maerten
    Tan, Tik
    Wehrens, Kim
    de Wit, Thijs
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    de Grzymala, Andrzej A. Piatkowski
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [26] Corticosteroids versus clobazam in epileptic encephalopathy with ESES: a European multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial (RESCUE ESES*)
    van den Munckhof, Bart
    Arzimanoglou, Alexis
    Perucca, Emilio
    van Teeseling, Heleen C.
    Leijten, Frans S. S.
    Braun, Kees P. J.
    Jansen, Floor E.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [27] Influenza vaccine efficacy in young children attending childcare: A randomised controlled trial
    Li-Kim-Moy, Jean P.
    Yin, Jiehui K.
    Heron, Leon
    Leask, Julie
    Lambert, Stephen B.
    Nissen, Michael
    Sloots, Theo
    Booy, Robert
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2017, 53 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [28] Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Enestvedt, B. K.
    Fennerty, M. B.
    Eisen, G. M.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (01) : 33 - 40
  • [29] Multicentre randomised controlled trial about the effect of individual reminiscence therapy in older adults with neurocognitive disorders
    Justo-Henriques, Susana I.
    Perez-Saez, Enrique
    Alves Apostolo, Joao L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 36 (05) : 704 - 712
  • [30] A multicentre, pragmatic, cluster randomised, controlled feasibility trial of the POD system of care
    Young, John
    Green, John
    Farrin, Amanda
    Collinson, Michelle
    Hartley, Suzanne
    Smith, Jane
    Teale, Elizabeth
    Siddiqi, Najma
    Inouye, Sharon K.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2020, 49 (04) : 640 - 647