Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Han, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yali [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Ai [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hengxi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 20,3rd Sect,South Renmin Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Trachelectomy; laparoscopic; minimally invasive surgery; cervical cancer; meta-analysis; fertility; FERTILITY-SPARING SURGERY; OUTCOMES; LAPAROTOMY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer has been questioned. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with cervical cancer who underwent MIS and abdominal trachelectomy. We searched for and subsequently analyzed studies published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Clinical Trials.gov from their inception until April 10, 2023. Six studies with 1,079 participants were included, constituting 512 and 567 patients in the MIS and abdominal surgery groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-1.65; I-2=0.0%; P=0.881), recurrence rate (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.68-2.33; I-2=0.0%; P=0.815), and death rate (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.23-1.31; I-2=0.0%; P=0.680) between the MIS and abdominal surgery groups. No significant difference was found in urinary tract complication (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.28-2.17; I-2=0.0%; P=0.603), cerclage erosion (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.34-2.43; I-2=0.0%; P=0.650), or cervical stenosis (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.22-2.18; I-2=0.0%; P=0.885) between both groups. However, significant differences in blood loss and length of hospital stay were observed between both groups. Among 49 females who attempted to get pregnant, 31.3% (5/16) and 51.5% (17/33) in the MIS and abdominal surgery groups, respectively, succeeded in conceiving. We established that laparoscopic and abdominal radical trachelectomy had similar efficacies for treating patients with early cervical cancer, with no significant differences in survival, tumor recurrence, and mortality rates. Additionally, they showed no significant differences in pregnancy-related outcomes. However, owing to the limited number of studies, more high-quality cohort studies are required to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:4466 / 4477
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2023, NCCN CLIN PRACTICE G
[2]   Fertility results and pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Bentivegna, Enrica ;
Maulard, Amandine ;
Pautier, Patricia ;
Chargari, Cyrus ;
Gouy, Sebastien ;
Morice, Philippe .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (05) :1195-+
[3]   Influence of lymph node involvement or lymphadenectomy on prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Fan, Yu ;
Zhang, Yu-fei ;
Wang, Meng-yao ;
Mu, Yi ;
Mo, Si-ping ;
Li, Jin-ke .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 (03) :797-803
[4]   Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: laparoscopic versus abdominal radical trachelectomy [J].
He, Zuoxi ;
Bian, Ce ;
Xie, Chuan .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
[5]   Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Is an Alternative to Laparotomy With Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer [J].
Kucukmetin, Ali ;
Biliatis, Ioannis ;
Ratnavelu, Nithya ;
Patel, Amit ;
Cameron, Iain ;
Ralte, Angela ;
Naik, Raj .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (01) :135-140
[6]   Incidence, risk factors and treatment of cervical stenosis after radical trachelectomy: A systematic review [J].
Li, Xiaoqi ;
Li, Jin ;
Wu, Xiaohua .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (13) :1751-1759
[7]   Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy [J].
Matsuo, Koji ;
Chen, Ling ;
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. ;
Melamed, Alexander ;
Roman, Lynda D. ;
Wright, Jason D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) :469.e1-469.e13
[8]   Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer [J].
Melamed, Alexander ;
Margul, Daniell J. ;
Chen, Ling ;
Keating, Nancy L. ;
del Carmen, Marcela G. ;
Yang, Junhua ;
Seagle, Brandon-Luke L. ;
Alexander, Amy ;
Barber, Emma L. ;
Rice, Laurel W. ;
Wright, Jason D. ;
Kocherginsky, Masha ;
Shahabi, Shohreh ;
Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (20) :1905-1914
[9]  
Moher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI [10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
[10]   Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review [J].
Morice, P. ;
Maulard, A. ;
Scherier, S. ;
Sanson, C. ;
Zarokian, J. ;
Zaccarini, F. ;
Espenel, S. ;
Pautier, P. ;
Leary, A. ;
Genestie, C. ;
Chargari, C. ;
Grynberg, M. ;
Gouy, S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 165 (01) :169-183