Study of seismic vulnerability of steel frame structures on soft ground considering group effect

被引:4
|
作者
Hou, Jiangjun [1 ]
Lu, Jinyu [1 ]
Chen, Shijin [1 ]
Li, Na [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
Steel frame structures; Seismic vulnerability; Structural group effect; Soil equivalent linearity; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; BUILDINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104934
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Earthquakes have caused increasingly severe casualties and economic losses in coastal urban areas where soft soils are widely distributed. To mitigate disaster losses, this paper aims to investigate the mechanism of the group effect, the interaction between a group of buildings (at least three) through the foundation, on seismic vulnerability in coastal urban areas. Firstly, the analysis models are established, and the validity is subsequently verified. Meanwhile, a self-built automatic iterative calculation program for multilayer soils is adopted to consider the nonlinearity of the soft soils. On this basis, probabilistic seismic demand analyses are further performed using ten earthquake ground motions. The seismic vulnerability formulas of the structures are obtained in combination with the probabilistic seismic demand models. Finally, the influence of the group effect on the seismic performance of the structures is evaluated from different perspectives based on the vulnerability formulas. The results indicate that the group effect of the steel frame structures makes the performance margin ratio (PMR) significantly higher and reduces the seismic vulnerability of the structures in coastal urban areas. The mechanism revealed in this paper presents a more accurate way to conduct earthquake-resistant design, provides guidelines for setting the criteria, and is likewise instructive to the seismic design of other structural forms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Probabilistic seismic demand models for steel frame structures subjected to pulse-like ground motions
    Zhao G.-C.
    Xu L.-J.
    Du J.-J.
    Zhu J.-Z.
    Zhu X.-J.
    Xie L.-L.
    Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2023, 57 (06): : 1080 - 1089
  • [22] Seismic design of underground structures in soft ground: A review
    Kawashima, K
    GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION IN SOFT GROUND, 2000, : 3 - 20
  • [23] Use of timber panels to reduce the seismic vulnerability of concrete frame structures
    Smiroldo, Francesco
    Giongo, Ivan
    Piazza, Maurizio
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 244
  • [24] Effects of Seismic and Progressive Collapse Designs on the Vulnerability of RC Frame Structures
    Lin, Kaiqi
    Li, Yi
    Lu, Xinzheng
    Guan, Hong
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2017, 31 (01)
  • [25] An Analytical Method for Elastic Seismic Response of Structures Considering the Effect of Ground Motion Duration
    Liang, Qianqian
    Zhao, Chen
    Hu, Jun
    Zeng, Hui
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (22):
  • [26] Location of semi-rigid connections effect on the seismic performance of steel frame structures
    Elhout, Emad A.
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 22 (03): : 1 - 10
  • [27] Model Analysis of Steel Frame Structures Considering Interactions between Racks and the Frame
    Zhang, Weiguang
    Yu, Chaoqun
    Tong, Genshu
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (07)
  • [28] The Effect of Damping on Seismic Performance of Steel Frame
    Wang, Xinwu
    Hu, Changjiao
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IV, 2014, 580-583 : 1477 - +
  • [29] Seismic analysis of steel structures considering damage cumulation
    Shen Z.
    Wu A.
    Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 2007, 1 (1): : 1 - 11
  • [30] Study on seismic performance of frame structures under the effect of high wind
    Hiraishi, Hisahiro
    Kani, Shintaro
    Yoshimasu, Yukihiro
    Kikitsu, Hitomitsu
    Yanagawa, Yukimori
    Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 2013, 78 (686): : 857 - 864