Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Zhi-Lu [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yi-Fei [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jie-Min [2 ]
Liu, Rui-Jue [2 ]
Yu, Xiao-Ying [2 ]
Wang, Meng [2 ]
Hao, Hong-Xia [2 ,5 ]
Liu, Dong-Mei [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [3 ,4 ,8 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ,7 ]
Xia, Wen-Tao [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Med Univ, Dept Forens Med, Guiyang 550009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Justice, Shanghai Forens Serv Platform, Inst Forens Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Forens Med, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Adv Commun & Data Sci, SMART Smart Med & AI based Radiol Technol Lab, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[5] Jiamusi Univ, Basic Med Coll, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] 1347 Guangfu West Rd, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[7] 9 Beijing Rd, Guiyang 50009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
oculartrauma; predictingvisiual acuity; best-corrected visual acuity; visual dysfunction; machine learning; PARS-PLANA VITRECTOMY; INJURY; SCORE;
D O I
10.18240/ijo.2023.07.02
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
? AIM: To predict best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by machine learning in patients with ocular trauma who were treated for at least 6mo. ? METHODS: The internal dataset consisted of 850 patients with 1589 eyes and an average age of 44.29y. The initial visual acuity was 0.99 logMAR. The test dataset consisted of 60 patients with 100 eyes collected while the model was optimized. Four different machine-learning algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector regression, Bayesian ridge, and random forest regressor) were used to predict BCVA, and four algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest classifier) were used to classify BCVA in patients with ocular trauma after treatment for 6mo or longer. Clinical features were obtained from outpatient records, and ocular parameters were extracted from optical coherence tomography images and fundus photographs. These features were put into different machine-learning models, and the obtained predicted values were compared with the actual BCVA values. The best-performing model and the best variable selected were further evaluated in the test dataset. ? RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the predicted and actual values [all Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)>0.6]. Considering only the data from the traumatic group (group A) into account, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.30 and 0.40 logMAR, respectively. In the traumatic and healthy groups (group B), the lowest MAE and RMSE were 0.20 and 0.33 logMAR, respectively. The sensitivity was always higher than the specificity in group A, in contrast to the results in group B. The classification accuracy and precision were above 0.80 in both groups. The MAE, RMSE, and PCC of the test dataset were 0.20, 0.29, and 0.96, respectively. The sensitivity, precision, specificity, and accuracy of the test dataset were 0.83, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.90, respectively. ? CONCLUSION: Predicting BCVA using machine-learning models in patients with treated ocular trauma is accurate and helpful in the identification of visual dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1014
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning model for identifying important clinical features for predicting remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics
    San Koo, Bon
    Eun, Seongho
    Shin, Kichul
    Yoon, Hyemin
    Hong, Chaelin
    Kim, Do-Hoon
    Hong, Seokchan
    Kim, Yong-Gil
    Lee, Chang-Keun
    Yoo, Bin
    Oh, Ji Seon
    [J]. ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2021, 23 (01)
  • [32] Predicting progression to dementia with "comprehensive visual rating scale" and machine learning algorithms
    Park, Chaeyoon
    Jang, Jae-Won
    Joo, Gihun
    Kim, Yeshin
    Kim, Seongheon
    Byeon, Gihwan
    Park, Sang Won
    Kasani, Payam Hosseinzadeh
    Yum, Sujin
    Pyun, Jung-Min
    Park, Young Ho
    Lim, Jae-Sung
    Youn, Young Chul
    Choi, Hyun-Soo
    Park, Chihyun
    Im, Hyeonseung
    Kim, SangYun
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [33] Machine learning model for identifying important clinical features for predicting remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics
    Bon San Koo
    Seongho Eun
    Kichul Shin
    Hyemin Yoon
    Chaelin Hong
    Do-Hoon Kim
    Seokchan Hong
    Yong-Gil Kim
    Chang-Keun Lee
    Bin Yoo
    Ji Seon Oh
    [J]. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 23
  • [34] Predicting the Onset of Diabetes with Machine Learning Methods
    Chou, Chun-Yang
    Hsu, Ding-Yang
    Chou, Chun-Hung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [35] Machine Learning Models for Predicting Water Quality of Treated Fruit and Vegetable Wastewater
    Mundi, Gurvinder
    Zytner, Richard G.
    Warriner, Keith
    Bonakdari, Hossein
    Gharabaghi, Bahram
    [J]. WATER, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [36] Predicting mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding using machine-learning
    Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu
    Gheonea, Dan Ionut
    Florescu, Dan Nicolae
    Iordache, Sevastita
    Cazacu, Sergiu Marian
    Iovanescu, Vlad Florin
    Rogoveanu, Ion
    Turcu-Stiolica, Adina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [37] Predicting the Outcome of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Machine-Learning-Guided Scorecard
    Zhang, Yi
    Zeng, Hanhai
    Zhou, Hang
    Li, Jingbo
    Wang, Tingting
    Guo, Yinghan
    Cai, Lingxin
    Hu, Junwen
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Chen, Gao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (22)
  • [38] Predicting mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes using machine learning and clinical notes
    Ye, Jiancheng
    Yao, Liang
    Shen, Jiahong
    Janarthanam, Rethavathi
    Luo, Yuan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (Suppl 11)
  • [39] Machine learning for predicting mortality in adult critically ill patients with Sepsis: A systematic review
    Nikravangolsefid, Nasrin
    Reddy, Swetha
    Truong, Hong Hieu
    Charkviani, Mariam
    Ninan, Jacob
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Suppadungsuk, Supawadee
    Singh, Waryaam
    Kashani, Kianoush B.
    Garces, Juan Pablo Domecq
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 84
  • [40] Factors predicting the early mortality of trauma patients
    Jin, Won Young Yong
    Jeong, Jin Hee
    Kim, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Tae Yun
    Kang, Changwoo
    Lee, Soo Hoon
    Lee, Sang Bong
    Kim, Seong Chun
    Park, Yong Joo
    Lim, Daesung
    [J]. ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 24 (06): : 532 - 538