Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Zhi-Lu [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Yi-Fei [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Jie-Min [2 ]
Liu, Rui-Jue [2 ]
Yu, Xiao-Ying [2 ]
Wang, Meng [2 ]
Hao, Hong-Xia [2 ,5 ]
Liu, Dong-Mei [2 ]
Zhang, Qi [3 ,4 ,8 ]
Wang, Jie [1 ,7 ]
Xia, Wen-Tao [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Med Univ, Dept Forens Med, Guiyang 550009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Justice, Shanghai Forens Serv Platform, Inst Forens Sci, Shanghai Key Lab Forens Med, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ, Shanghai Inst Adv Commun & Data Sci, SMART Smart Med & AI based Radiol Technol Lab, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[5] Jiamusi Univ, Basic Med Coll, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
[6] 1347 Guangfu West Rd, Shanghai 200063, Peoples R China
[7] 9 Beijing Rd, Guiyang 50009, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Univ, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
oculartrauma; predictingvisiual acuity; best-corrected visual acuity; visual dysfunction; machine learning; PARS-PLANA VITRECTOMY; INJURY; SCORE;
D O I
10.18240/ijo.2023.07.02
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
? AIM: To predict best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by machine learning in patients with ocular trauma who were treated for at least 6mo. ? METHODS: The internal dataset consisted of 850 patients with 1589 eyes and an average age of 44.29y. The initial visual acuity was 0.99 logMAR. The test dataset consisted of 60 patients with 100 eyes collected while the model was optimized. Four different machine-learning algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector regression, Bayesian ridge, and random forest regressor) were used to predict BCVA, and four algorithms (Extreme Gradient Boosting, support vector machine, logistic regression, and random forest classifier) were used to classify BCVA in patients with ocular trauma after treatment for 6mo or longer. Clinical features were obtained from outpatient records, and ocular parameters were extracted from optical coherence tomography images and fundus photographs. These features were put into different machine-learning models, and the obtained predicted values were compared with the actual BCVA values. The best-performing model and the best variable selected were further evaluated in the test dataset. ? RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the predicted and actual values [all Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)>0.6]. Considering only the data from the traumatic group (group A) into account, the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) were 0.30 and 0.40 logMAR, respectively. In the traumatic and healthy groups (group B), the lowest MAE and RMSE were 0.20 and 0.33 logMAR, respectively. The sensitivity was always higher than the specificity in group A, in contrast to the results in group B. The classification accuracy and precision were above 0.80 in both groups. The MAE, RMSE, and PCC of the test dataset were 0.20, 0.29, and 0.96, respectively. The sensitivity, precision, specificity, and accuracy of the test dataset were 0.83, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.90, respectively. ? CONCLUSION: Predicting BCVA using machine-learning models in patients with treated ocular trauma is accurate and helpful in the identification of visual dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1014
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting visual acuity with machine learning in treated ocular trauma patients
    Zhi-Lu Zhou
    Yi-Fei Yan
    Jie-Min Chen
    Rui-Jue Liu
    Xiao-Ying Yu
    Meng Wang
    Hong-Xia Hao
    Dong-Mei Liu
    Qi Zhang
    Jie Wang
    Wen-Tao Xia
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, (07) : 1005 - 1014
  • [2] Predicting Visual Acuity in Patients Treated for AMD
    Marginean, Beatrice-Andreea
    Groza, Adrian
    Muntean, George
    Nicoara, Simona Delia
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [3] Predicting Visual Acuity by Using Machine Learning in Patients Treated for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Rohm, Markus
    Tresp, Volker
    Mueller, Michael
    Kern, Christoph
    Manakov, Ilja
    Weiss, Maximilian
    Sim, Dawn A.
    Priglinger, Siegfried
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Kortuem, Karsten
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 125 (07) : 1028 - 1036
  • [4] Predicting Visual Acuity for Open Globe Injuries using Machine Learning
    Johnson, Keir
    Armstrong, Grayson
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [5] Predicting visual acuity outcomes in nAMD, RVO and DME by machine learning
    Sadeghipour, Amir
    Waldstein, Sebastian M.
    Gerendas, Bianca S.
    Osborne, Aaron
    Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [6] Multidisciplinary approach to improving documentation of visual acuity in patients presenting with ocular trauma
    L Low
    M Johnston
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [7] Predicting visual acuity from measured ocular aberrations
    Rafael, N
    Nestares, O
    Antona, B
    Hernández, J
    OPTICS FOR THE QUALITY OF LIFE, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, 4829 : 1004 - 1005
  • [8] The role of computerised tomography in predicting visual outcome in ocular trauma patients
    R Chaudhary
    M Upendran
    N Campion
    A Yeung
    R Blanch
    P Morgan-Warren
    I Gibb
    T Nelson
    R Scott
    Eye, 2015, 29 : 867 - 871
  • [9] The role of computerised tomography in predicting visual outcome in ocular trauma patients
    Chaudhary, R.
    Upendran, M.
    Campion, N.
    Yeung, A.
    Blanch, R.
    Morgan-Warren, P.
    Gibb, I.
    Nelson, T.
    Scott, R.
    EYE, 2015, 29 (07) : 867 - 871
  • [10] Predicting postoperative visual acuity in epiretinal membrane patients and visualization of the contribution of explanatory variables in a machine learning model
    Irie-Ota, Akiko
    Matsui, Yoshitsugu
    Imai, Koki
    Mase, Yoko
    Konno, Keiichiro
    Sasaki, Taku
    Chujo, Shinichiro
    Matsubara, Hisashi
    Kawanaka, Hiroharu
    Kondo, Mineo
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):