Psychopathological profile and sagittal alignment in low-back pain

被引:1
|
作者
Collinet, Arnaud [1 ]
Ntilikina, Yves [1 ]
Romani, Aude [1 ]
Schuller, Sebastien [1 ]
Sauleau, Erik-Andre [2 ]
Charles, Yann Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, Hop Hautepierre 2, Hop Univ Strasbourg, Serv Chirurg rachis, 1, Ave Moliere, F-67200 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg, Hop Univ Strasbourg, Pole Sante publ, Strasbourg, France
关键词
Low -back pain; Psychopathologic profile; Sagittal alignment; Biopsychosocial model; FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS; RATING-SCALE; SPINE; CLASSIFICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SCOLIOSIS; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103474
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Low-back pain requires comprehensive care using a biopsychosocial model. The psychologic dimension plays an important role, but the link between sagittal alignment and a given psychopathological profile is little studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychopathological profiles and sagittal parameters of a population with low-back pain and to assess the link. Material and methods: 205 patients, with a mean age of 49.6 years (range, 18-70 years), presenting chronic common low-back pain without radicular involvement, were included prospectively. Mood scores comprised: the self-administered "Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale" (HAD), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Radiological parameters, measured on lateral full-spine radiographs, included: L1-S1 lordosis, T1-T12 kyphosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, and Roussouly type. Results: Mean HAM-A score was 16.1; 54% of patients had scores >= 14, indicating anxiety disorder. Mean HAM-D score was 10.8; 55% of patients had scores >= 10, indicating depressive disorder. Mean YMRS score was 2.6; only 1 patient had a score >= 20, indicating manic disorder. The 112 patients with HAM-A score > 14 showed mean 51.6 degrees L1-S1 lordosis (p = 0.356), 48.3 degrees T1-T12 kyphosis (p = 0.590), -4.3 mm C7 SVA (p = 0.900), and 29.3 degrees T1 slope (p = 0.451). In case of HAM-A <14, there were no significant differences. The 113 patients with HAM-D score > 10 showed significant differences in T1-T12 kyphosis (mean 49.0 degrees; p < 0.05) and T1 slope (30.2 degrees; p < 0.05); mean L1-S1 lordosis was 50.5 degrees (p = 0.861) and C7 SVA 1.6 mm (p = 0.462). In case of HAM-D < 10, T1-T12 kyphosis was 45.5 degrees (p < 0.05) and T1 slope 26.2 degrees (p < 0.05); mean lordosis was 50.9 degrees (p = 0.861) and mean C7 SVA -7.1 mm (p = 0.259). Multivariate analysis found no significant link between Roussouly type and psychiatric scores: HAD (p = 0.715), HAM-A (p = 0.652), and HAM-D (p = 0.902). Conclusion: More than 50% of patients with common low-back pain presented a mood disorder. Depres-sive disorder was associated with greater T1-T12 kyphosis and T1 slope. There was no relationship between psychiatric scores and overall sagittal alignment.Level of evidence: II.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The importance of lumbar dynamometric examination in patients with low-back pain
    Guler, Mustafa
    Aydin, Teoman
    Erdolu, Senol
    Poyraz, Emine
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 43 (06) : 1034 - 1041
  • [22] Red flags to screen for malignancy in patients with low-back pain
    Henschke, Nicholas
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Macaskill, Petra
    Irwig, Les
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02):
  • [23] Physical activity and low-back pain in schoolchildren
    Skoffer, Birgit
    Foldspang, Anders
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (03) : 373 - 379
  • [24] Physical Ergonomics in Low-Back Pain Prevention
    Troy Jones
    Shrawan Kumar
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2001, 11 : 309 - 319
  • [25] Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica
    Wegner, Inge
    Widyahening, Indah S.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Blomberg, Stefan E. I.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Bronfort, Gert
    Bouter, Lex M.
    van der Heijden, Geert J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (08):
  • [26] Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention
    Jones, T
    Kumar, S
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 11 (04) : 309 - 319
  • [27] Effects of mattress support on sleeping position and low-back pain
    Roman Bolton
    Hidde Hulshof
    Hein A. M. Daanen
    Jaap H. van Dieën
    Sleep Science and Practice, 6 (1)
  • [28] Psychosocial correlates of low-back pain in adolescents
    Sjölie, AN
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2002, 11 (06) : 582 - 588
  • [29] Occupational low-back pain in hospital nurses
    Serranheira, F.
    Sousa-Uva, M.
    Sousa-Uva, A.
    OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE, 2013, : 297 - 301
  • [30] Physical activity and low-back pain in schoolchildren
    Birgit Skoffer
    Anders Foldspang
    European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 373 - 379