Waste to wheels: Performance comparison between pressure swing adsorption and amine-absorption technologies for upgrading biogas containing hydrogen sulfide to fuel grade standards

被引:19
作者
Abd, Ammar Ali [1 ,4 ]
Othman, Mohd Roslee [1 ]
Helwani, Zuchra [2 ]
Kim, Jinsoo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Chem Engn, Nibong Tebal 14300, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
[2] Univ Riau, Dept Chem Engn, Pekanbaru 28293, Indonesia
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Chem Engn Integrated Engn, 1732 Doegyeong Daero, Yongin 17104, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Al Qasim Green Univ, Coll Engn, Babylon 51002, Iraq
关键词
Biogas upgrading; Pressure swing adsorption; Amine absorption; Piperazine; MDEA; CO; 2; separation; CARBON-DIOXIDE ABSORPTION; CO2; CAPTURE; N-METHYLDIETHANOLAMINE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; REACTION-KINETICS; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; GAS; REMOVAL; MDEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.127060
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Amine-absorption and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) technologies have been regarded as attractive methods to upgrade biogas by separating acid gases such as CO2 and H2S from its main component, CH4. This paper com-pares the separation performance and energy consumption by pressure swing adsorption and amine-absorption processes in upgrading biogas containing 39.9% CO2, 0.1% H2S, and 60% CH4. PSA and amine-absorption processes were emulated using Aspen Adsorption and Aspen Hysys platforms and validated from experimental data. The results reveal that amine-absorption technology was favorable in terms of purity and recovery of products in both streams. The optimum points of the process with desirability of 99.9% were at 0.1% H2S content, 30% CO2 content, 1% piperazine concentration, and 50% MDEA concentration with biomethane purity (99.64%) and recovery (94.84%) in the product stream, and acid gases purity (94.84%) and recovery (99.97%) in the waste stream. In term of energy consumption, however, the pressure swing adsorption process recorded a lower energy requirement of 0.178 kW/molCH4 at comparable biomethane purity of 96.2% and lower methane recovery of 80% with subsequently lower acid gases purity (85.5%) and recovery (86.7%).
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [31] MDEA/Piperazine as a solvent for CO2 capture
    Closmann, Fred
    Nguyen, Thu
    Rochelle, Gary T.
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 1351 - 1357
  • [32] Studies on the effect of addition of piperazine and sulfolane into aqueous solution of N-methyldiethanolamine for CO2 capture and VLE modelling using eNRTL equation
    Dash, Sukanta Kumar
    Bandyopadhyay, Syamalendu S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 44 : 227 - 237
  • [33] CARBON-DIOXIDE REACTION-KINETICS AND TRANSPORT IN AQUEOUS AMINE MEMBRANES
    DONALDSON, TL
    NGUYEN, YN
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY FUNDAMENTALS, 1980, 19 (03): : 260 - 266
  • [34] Carbon dioxide absorption into aqueous amine based solvents: modeling and absorption tests
    Dubois, Lionel
    Thomas, Diane
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 1353 - 1360
  • [35] Separation of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading to biomethane
    Ferella, Francesco
    Puca, Alessandro
    Taglieri, Giuliana
    Rossi, Leucio
    Gallucci, Katia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 1205 - 1218
  • [36] Exergy analysis: A CO2 removal plant using a-MDEA as the solvent
    Feyzi, Vafa
    Beheshti, Masoud
    Kharaji, Abolfazl Gharibi
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 118 : 77 - 84
  • [37] Review of recent trends and various techniques for CO2 capture: Special emphasis on biphasic amine solvents
    Gautam A.
    Mondal M.K.
    [J]. Fuel, 2023, 334
  • [38] Biogas to fuel by vacuum pressure swing adsorption - I. Behavior of equilibrium and kinetic-based adsorbents
    Grande, Carlos A.
    Rodrigues, Alirio E.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2007, 46 (13) : 4595 - 4605
  • [39] Silica Gel as a Selective Adsorbent for Biogas Drying and Upgrading
    Grande, Carlos A.
    Morence, Daniela G. B.
    Bouzga, Aud M.
    Andreassen, Kari Anne
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (21) : 10142 - 10149
  • [40] Techno-economical evaluation of membrane based biogas upgrading system: A comparison between polymeric membrane and carbon membrane technology
    Haider, Shamim
    Lindbrathen, Arne
    Hagg, May-Britt
    [J]. GREEN ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 1 (03) : 222 - 234