Effect of patient safety education interventions on patient safety culture of health care professionals: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To synthesize and evaluate the cumulative effect of patient safety education intervention for health care professional staff in the hospital setting on their patient safety culture. Background: Patient security Culture is an important factor in ensuring patient safety and it is recommended as one of the pillars of preventive strategies in the healthcare system.Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis were prospectively registered with PROSPERO.Methods: This review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, CINAHL, Cochran Li-brary, Web of Science and randomized control trial registration databases from January 1999 to February 2021. Studies on patient safety culture intervention were included. We assessed research quality using the jadad scale for RCTs and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized StudiesResults: Sixteen studies with a total of 3438 participants in the intervention group and 3121 in the control group were included in the final analysis. The random-effect meta-analysis shows significant heterogeneity among studies that assessed patient safety culture as a mean percentage of positive responses or as a mean score of 1-5 scale. (I2 = 91% and 77%, respectively). Also, there was a significant difference between experimental and control group in the overall pooled effect of patient safety culture in the studies that used the mean percentage of positive response [Mean Difference = 5.24, 95% confidence interval (1.32, 9.16, Z = 2.62; P = 0.009] or the mean score [Mean Difference = 0.08, 95% confidence interval (0.01, 0.15), Z = 2.26; P = 0.02]. The difference was no longer significant in the mean score studies after excluding the studies with low-quality scores. Subgroup analysis showed no change in the pooled effect of the studies with quasi-experimental [Mean Difference = 7.84, 95% confidence interval (2.35, 13.33); Z = 2.80; p = 0.005) or before-after design [MD= 0.11, 95% confidence interval (0.07, 0.14); Z = 5.74; p = 0.000]. However, the patient safety education intervention remained effective after one year of follow-up.Conclusions: Our review Provides empirical evidence on current efforts in patient safety education to improve a healthcare professional-patient safety culture. The Patient safety education program could improve the patient safety culture of health care professionals.