Implementation of Multidisciplinary and Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Sonic Boom Prediction

被引:1
作者
Tekaslan, Huseyin Emre [1 ]
Yildiz, Sihmehmet [1 ]
Demiroglu, Yusuf [1 ]
Nikbay, Melike [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Fac Aeronaut & Astronaut, AeroMDO Lab, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2023年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.C036962
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
To advance a supersonic aircraft design process, an uncertainty quantification study is conducted for sonic boom prediction while considering uncertainties associated with flight and atmospheric conditions. The uncertainty quantification process is implemented within a multidisciplinary analyses framework and assisted with a multifidelity surrogate model based approach. The sonic boom prediction framework requires input from the flowfield pressure distribution solution to generate the near-field pressure signature of the aircraft, which is then propagated throughout the atmosphere to the ground by using aeroacoustic methods. The open-source SU2 suite is employed as a high-fidelity flow solver tool to obtain the aerodynamic solution, while in-house postprocessing scripts are developed to generate the required near-field pressure signature. For low-fidelity flow analysis, A502 PAN AIR, a higher-order panel code which solves flows around slender bodies in low angles of attack for subsonic and supersonic regimes, is used. For nonlinear aeroacoustic propagation, NASA Langley Research Center's code sBOOM exploits the near-field pressure signature for both high-fidelity and low-fidelity sonic boom calculations. Efficient uncertainty quantification tools are developed in house by implementing multifidelity polynomial chaos expansion and multifidelity Monte Carlo methods. Several flight and atmospheric parameters are selected to include randomness where these uncertainties are propagated into the sonic boom loudness prediction of the JAXA wing-body model, which is a low boom aircraft. Finally, an overall assessment of the multifidelity uncertainty quantification methods is presented in terms of efficiency and numerical accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 422
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [21] A Bayesian learning framework for fast prediction and uncertainty quantification of additively manufactured multi-material components
    Kim, Jee Yun
    Garcia, David
    Zhu, Yunhui
    Higdon, David M.
    Yu, Hang Z.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 303
  • [22] A comparative study of evolutionary statistical methods for uncertainty reduction in forest fire propagation prediction
    Laura Tardivo, Maria
    Caymes-Seutari, Paola
    Bianchini, German
    Mendez-Garabetti, Miguel
    Cencerrado, Andres
    Cortes, Ana
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE (ICCS 2017), 2017, 108 : 2018 - 2027
  • [23] Pairwise Difference Regression: A Machine Learning Meta-algorithm for Improved Prediction and Uncertainty Quantification in Chemical Search
    Tynes, Michael
    Gao, Wenhao
    Burrill, Daniel J.
    Batista, Enrique R.
    Perez, Danny
    Yang, Ping
    Lubbers, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2021, 61 (08) : 3846 - 3857
  • [24] Uncertainty quantification for gene delivery methods: A roadmap for pDNA manufacturing from phase I clinical trials to commercialization
    Triantafyllou, Niki
    Sarkis, Miriam
    Krassakopoulou, Aikaterina
    Shah, Nilay
    Papathanasiou, Maria M.
    Kontoravdi, Cleo
    BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [25] Application of data-based prediction methods in newsvendor problems subject to purchase price uncertainty
    Guimaraes, Marcela Silva
    Lins, Isis Didier
    Moura, Marcio das Chagas
    Duarte, Heitor de Oliveira
    2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (SSCI), 2020, : 2640 - 2646
  • [26] Microstructure-Sensitive Uncertainty Quantification for Crystal Plasticity Finite Element Constitutive Models Using Stochastic Collocation Methods
    Tran, Anh
    Wildey, Tim
    Lim, Hojun
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2022, 9
  • [27] Uncertainty quantification of 3D acoustic shape sensitivities with generalized nth-order perturbation boundary element methods
    Chen, Leilei
    Huo, Ruijin
    Lian, Haojie
    Yu, Bo
    Zhang, Mengxi
    Natarajan, Sundararajan
    Bordas, Stephane P. A.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 433
  • [28] Study on deep learning methods for coal burst risk prediction based on mining-induced seismicity quantification
    Cheng, Xianggang
    Qiao, Wei
    He, Hu
    GEOMECHANICS AND GEOPHYSICS FOR GEO-ENERGY AND GEO-RESOURCES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [29] Comparing Nonlinear Regression and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Assessment of Prediction Uncertainty in Vadose Zone Modeling
    Shi, Xiaoqing
    Ye, Ming
    Finsterle, Stefan
    Wu, Jichun
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2012, 11 (04)
  • [30] Parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification of rainfall-runoff models using data assimilation methods based on deep learning and local ensemble updates
    Yao, Lei
    Zhang, Jiangjiang
    Cao, Chenglong
    Zheng, Feifei
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2025, 185