Non-pharmacological Home Therapies for Subacute Low Back Pain in Active Duty Military Personnel: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:4
|
作者
Talbot, Laura A. [1 ]
Webb, Lee [2 ]
Ramirez, Vanessa J. [2 ]
Morrell, Christopher [3 ]
Bryndziar, Martina [1 ]
Enochs, Kayla [1 ]
Metter, E. Jeffrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] La Pointe Hlth Clin, Phys Therapy, Ft Campbell, KY 42240 USA
[3] Loyola Univ Maryland, Dept Math & Stat, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
关键词
6-MINUTE WALK TEST; LUMBAR; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; STRENGTH; INJURY; TESTS;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usab382
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of visits to ambulatory care, missed duty time, and disability discharge. The subacute phase of LBP presents an opportune time to prevent chronicity and lessen recurrence. The goal of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to determine the relative effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training and a progressive exercise program (PEP) on improving physical performance, pain, and torso strength in U.S. service members with subacute LBP, compared to standard primary care management (PCM) alone. Methods This is an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol for an RCT conducted with active duty military personnel (n = 128) at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, between April 2018 and March 2020. Participants were randomized to receive NMES (n = 43), PEP (n = 42), or PCM (n = 43) for 9 weeks. Outcome measures of physical performance (sit-ups, push-ups, walking, and torso endurance), torso muscle strength (flexion and extension), and pain were assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 9 weeks. Analysis was intent-to-treat using linear mixed effects models. A sensitivity analysis was performed to address the protocol deviations that occurred in response to coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which required rescheduling 17 in-person study visits to home assessments at 9-week testing. Results Evidence was found for group differences in physical performance for sit-ups and push-ups, with NMES showing greater improvement than PCM. The two groups showed similar improvements in torso muscle strength, although the NMES groups may show better improvement during early treatment. No group differences in pain levels were observed during the intervention, and all groups improved during the course of the study period. The amount of NMES muscle stimulation was directly related to the level of improvement, which was not the case for the hours reported for PEP exercise. Conclusion In an active duty population with subacute LBP, integrating NMES strength training into the rehabilitation therapy may offer a modest benefit for increasing sit-ups and push-ups and improving torso strength.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 19
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of a supervised exercise program in addition to electrical stimulation or kinesio taping in low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Aguilar-Ferrandiz, Maria Encarnacion
    Mataran-Penarrocha, Guillermo A.
    Tapia-Haro, Rosa Maria
    Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda
    Marti-Garcia, Celia
    Castro-Sanchez, Adelaida Maria
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [42] Effects of Thoracic Spine Self-mobilization on Patients with Low Back Pain and Lumbar Hypermobility: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yasuda, Toru
    Jaotawipart, Sirinda
    Kuruma, Hironobu
    PROGRESS IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 8
  • [43] Effect of a Healing Program Using Marine Resources on Reducing Pain and Improving Physical Function in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study
    Baek, Ji-Eun
    Kim, Sung-Hyeon
    Shin, Ho-Jin
    Cho, Hwi-Young
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (02):
  • [44] Effects of compression at myofascial trigger points in patients with acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Takamoto, K.
    Bito, I.
    Urakawa, S.
    Sakai, S.
    Kigawa, M.
    Ono, T.
    Nishijo, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 19 (08) : 1186 - 1196
  • [45] The immediate and short-term effects of dynamic taping on pain, endurance, disability, mobility and kinesiophobia in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial
    Alahmari, Khalid A.
    Rengaramanujam, Kanagaraj
    Reddy, Ravi Shankar
    Samuel, Paul Silvian
    Tedla, Jaya Shanker
    Kakaraparthi, Venkata Nagaraj
    Ahmad, Irshad
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [46] Effectiveness and Acceptance of Acupuncture in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Weiss, Johannes
    Quante, Sabine
    Xue, Fuping
    Muche, Rainer
    Reuss-Borst, Monika
    JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2013, 19 (12) : 935 - 941
  • [47] Clinical relevance of combined treatment with exercise in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
    Blanco-Gimenez, P.
    Vicente-Mampel, J.
    Gargallo, P.
    Baraja-Vegas, L.
    Bautista, I. J.
    Ros-Bernal, F.
    Barrios, C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [48] Is phonophoresis effective in the treatment of chronic low back pain? A single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Durmus, Dilek
    Alayli, Gamze
    Goktepe, Ahmet Salim
    Taskaynatan, Mehmet Ali
    Bilgici, Ayhan
    Kuru, Omer
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 33 (07) : 1737 - 1744
  • [49] INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE FOR THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT TREATMENT OF ACUTE RADICULAR LOW BACK PAIN, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Tanen, David A.
    Shimada, Mai
    Danish, D. Chris
    Dos Santos, Frank
    Makela, Martin
    Riffenburgh, Robert H.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 47 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [50] Acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing treatment session numbers
    Liu, Lizhou
    Skinner, Margot A.
    McDonough, Suzanne M.
    Baxter, G. David
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (12) : 1592 - 1603