Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families

被引:4
|
作者
Phillips, Amicia [1 ]
Vears, Danya F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Van Hoyweghen, Ine [4 ]
Borry, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Biomed Ethics Res Grp, Parkville, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Law Sch, Parkville, Australia
[4] Ctr Sociol Res, Life Sci & Soc Lab, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Qualitative research; Genomics; Genetics; Policy; Ethics; HEREDITARY BREAST; LYNCH SYNDROME; OVARIAN-CANCER; INFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; RELATIVES; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool with significant implications for patients and their relatives, however, empirical evidence suggests that effective dissemination of risk information within families remains a challenge. Policy responses to address this issue vary across countries, with Belgium notably lacking specific regulations governing nondisclosure of genetic risk. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians from Belgian clinical genetics centers to gain insight into their perspectives on policy approaches to the disclosure of genetic risk within families. Using real-world examples of legislation and court rulings from France, Australia, and the UK, we explored clinician viewpoints on the roles and responsibilities of both patients and clinicians in the family communication process. Clinicians expressed confusion regarding what was legally permissible regarding contacting at-risk relatives. While there was a consensus among participants that patients have a responsibility to inform their at-risk relatives, participants were hesitant to support the legal enforcement of this duty. Clinicians mostly recognized some responsibility to at-risk relatives, but the extent of this responsibility was a subject of division. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive policy that clarifies the roles and responsibilities of clinicians and patients to inform at-risk relatives. Furthermore, the study underscores the practical challenges clinicians face in supporting patients through the complex process of family communication, suggesting a need for additional resources and the exploration of alternative approaches to communication.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ethics of future disclosure of individual risk information in a genetic cohort study: A survey of donor preferences
    Matsui, Kenji
    Lie, Reidar K.
    Kita, Yoshikuni
    Ueshima, Hirotsugu
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (05) : 217 - 224
  • [32] Acceptance of Automated Social Risk Scoring in the EmergencyDepartment: Clinician, Staff, and Patient Perspectives
    Mazurenko, Olena
    Hirsh, Adam T.
    Harle, Christopher A.
    McNamee, Cassidy
    Vest, Joshua R.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 25 (04)
  • [33] Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals on Clinician-Patient Communication of Cardiovascular Disease Risk
    Campbell, Mark
    Mcevoy, John William
    Calpin, Gavin
    Concannon, Fiona
    Redfern, Sam
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [34] Policy uncertainty, bad news disclosure, and stock price crash risk
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Tseng, Kevin
    Wang, Jundong
    Xi, Yaoyi
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2024, 78
  • [35] Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: In Favor of a Qualified Disclosure Policy
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
    Van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2011, 32 (08) : 861 - 867
  • [36] Therapeutic Approaches to Genetic Ion Channelopathies and Perspectives in Drug Discovery
    Imbrici, Paola
    Liantonio, Antonella
    Camerino, Giulia M.
    De Bellis, Michela
    Camerino, Claudia
    Mele, Antonietta
    Giustino, Arcangela
    Pierno, Sabata
    De Luca, Annamaria
    Tricarico, Domenico
    Desaphy, Jean-Francois
    Conte, Diana
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [37] Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Two Telemedicine Approaches for Treating Patients with Mental Health Disorders in Underserved Areas
    Hall, Jennifer D.
    Danna, Maria N.
    Hoeft, Theresa J.
    Solberg, Leif, I
    Takamine, Linda H.
    Fortney, John C.
    Nolan, John Paul
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (03) : 465 - +
  • [38] Test-takers' perspectives on consumer genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk
    Kilbride, Madison K.
    Kessler, Lisa Jay
    Cronier, Brigitte
    Park, Jacqueline J.
    Cacioppo, Cara N.
    Beem, Jordyn
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2024, 15
  • [39] Discordant Patient and Clinician Perspectives on the Potential Value of Genetic Services in Safety-Net Clinics
    McMullen, Carmit
    Holup, Joan
    Davis, James, V
    Foley, Perry
    Jacob, Lorie
    Cottrell, Erika
    Bui, David P.
    Wilfond, Benjamin
    Goddard, Katrina A. B.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2020, 31 (03) : 1347 - 1363
  • [40] Parents' responses to prognostic disclosure at diagnosis of a child with a high-risk brain tumor: Analysis of clinician-parent interactions and implications for clinical practice
    Bluebond-Langner, Myra
    Hall, Nicolas
    Vincent, Katherine
    Henderson, Ellen M.
    Russell, Jessica
    Beecham, Emma
    Bryan, Gemma
    Gains, Jennifer E.
    Gaze, Mark N.
    Slater, Olga
    Langner, Richard W.
    Hargrave, Darren
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2021, 68 (03)