Clinician perspectives on policy approaches to genetic risk disclosure in families

被引:4
|
作者
Phillips, Amicia [1 ]
Vears, Danya F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Van Hoyweghen, Ine [4 ]
Borry, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Biomed Ethics Res Grp, Parkville, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Law Sch, Parkville, Australia
[4] Ctr Sociol Res, Life Sci & Soc Lab, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Qualitative research; Genomics; Genetics; Policy; Ethics; HEREDITARY BREAST; LYNCH SYNDROME; OVARIAN-CANCER; INFORMATION; COMMUNICATION; RELATIVES; MEMBERS;
D O I
10.1007/s10689-024-00375-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Genomic sequencing has emerged as a powerful tool with significant implications for patients and their relatives, however, empirical evidence suggests that effective dissemination of risk information within families remains a challenge. Policy responses to address this issue vary across countries, with Belgium notably lacking specific regulations governing nondisclosure of genetic risk. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians from Belgian clinical genetics centers to gain insight into their perspectives on policy approaches to the disclosure of genetic risk within families. Using real-world examples of legislation and court rulings from France, Australia, and the UK, we explored clinician viewpoints on the roles and responsibilities of both patients and clinicians in the family communication process. Clinicians expressed confusion regarding what was legally permissible regarding contacting at-risk relatives. While there was a consensus among participants that patients have a responsibility to inform their at-risk relatives, participants were hesitant to support the legal enforcement of this duty. Clinicians mostly recognized some responsibility to at-risk relatives, but the extent of this responsibility was a subject of division. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive policy that clarifies the roles and responsibilities of clinicians and patients to inform at-risk relatives. Furthermore, the study underscores the practical challenges clinicians face in supporting patients through the complex process of family communication, suggesting a need for additional resources and the exploration of alternative approaches to communication.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Focus Group Study of Perceptions of Genetic Risk Disclosure in Members of the Public in Sweden: "I'll Phone the Five Closest Ones, but What Happens to the Other Ten?"
    Hawranek, Carolina
    Hajdarevic, Senada
    Rosen, Anna
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [22] Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations
    Zhu, Xuan
    Basappa, Susanna N.
    Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
    Albertie, Monica L.
    Pantoja, Elizabeth
    Prescott, Darin
    Radecki Breitkopf, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2020, 11 (04) : 433 - 443
  • [23] Clinician Conflicts of Interest at the Cleveland Clinic: The Context and Functions of Disclosure Policy and What Remains Unknown
    Rodwin, Marc A.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2024, 52 (03) : 743 - 749
  • [24] Communication about spinal muscular atrophy and genetic risk within families: An Australian pilot study
    Pieper, Ellen
    Sexton, Adrienne
    Ryan, Monique M.
    Forbes, Robin
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2020, 56 (08) : 1263 - 1269
  • [25] Clinician perspectives of policy implementation: A qualitative study of the implementation of a national infection prevention policy in Australian hospitals
    Havers, Sally M.
    Russo, Philip L.
    Page, Katie
    Wilson, Andrew
    Hall, Lisa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2019, 47 (04) : 366 - 370
  • [26] Disclosure and plan of care at end of life: Perspectives of people with intellectual disabilities and families in Ireland
    Cithambaram, Kumaresan
    Duffy, Mel
    Courtney, Eileen
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2020, 48 (04) : 340 - 347
  • [27] Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: the Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure
    Battistuzzi, L.
    Ciliberti, R.
    Forzano, F.
    De Stefano, F.
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2012, 82 (03) : 205 - 209
  • [28] A randomized noninferiority trial of condensed protocols for genetic risk disclosure of Alzheimer's disease
    Green, Robert C.
    Christensen, Kurt D.
    Cupples, L. Adrienne
    Relkin, Norman R.
    Whitehouse, Peter J.
    Royal, Charmaine D. M.
    Obisesan, Thomas O.
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    Linnenbringer, Erin
    Butson, Melissa Barber
    Fasaye, Grace-Ann
    Levinson, Elana
    Roberts, J. Scott
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA, 2015, 11 (10) : 1222 - 1230
  • [29] Individual and family characteristics associated with BRCA1/2 genetic testing in high-risk families
    Katapodi, Maria C.
    Northouse, Laurel L.
    Milliron, Kara J.
    Liu, Guipeng
    Merajver, Sofia D.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (06) : 1336 - 1343
  • [30] Navigating the disclosure landscape: Parents' perspectives on healthcare professionals' role in supporting intersex children and families
    Horowitz, Kayla
    Zayhowski, Kimberly
    Palmour, Nicole
    Haghighat, Darius
    Joly, Yann
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2025, 34 (02)