Data-Driven Causal Effect Estimation Based on Graphical Causal Modelling: A Survey

被引:14
作者
Cheng, Debo [1 ]
Li, Jiuyong [1 ]
Liu, Lin [1 ]
Liu, Jixue [1 ]
Thuc Duy Le [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA STEM, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Causal inference; causality; graphical causal model; causal effect estimation; latent confounders; instrumental variable; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION; DOUBLY ROBUST ESTIMATION; DIRECTED ACYCLIC GRAPHS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; COVARIATE SELECTION; INFERENCE; MARKOV; IDENTIFICATION; PACKAGE; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1145/3636423
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In many fields of scientific research and real-world applications, unbiased estimation of causal effects from non-experimental data is crucial for understanding the mechanism underlying the data and for decision-making on effective responses or interventions. A great deal of research has been conducted to address this challenging problem from different angles. For estimating causal effect in observational data, assumptions such as Markov condition, faithfulness, and causal sufficiency are always made. Under the assumptions, full knowledge, such as a set of covariates or an underlying causal graph, is typically required. A practical challenge is that in many applications, no such full knowledge or only some partial knowledge is available. In recent years, research has emerged to use search strategies based on graphical causal modelling to discover useful knowledge from data for causal effect estimation, with some mild assumptions, and has shown promise in tackling the practical challenge. In this survey, we reviewthese data-drivenmethods on causal effect estimation for a single treatment with a single outcome of interest and focus on the challenges faced by data-driven causal effect estimation. We concisely summarise the basic concepts and theories that are essential for data-driven causal effect estimation using graphical causal modelling but are scattered around the literature. We identify and discuss the challenges faced by data-driven causal effect estimation and characterise the existing methods by their assumptions and the approaches to tackling the challenges. We analyse the strengths and limitations of the different types of methods and present an empirical evaluation to support the discussions. We hope this review will motivate more researchers to design better data-driven methods based on graphical causal modelling for the challenging problem of causal effect estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 161 条
[1]   Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models [J].
Abadie, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2003, 113 (02) :231-263
[2]   Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
ECONOMETRICA, 2016, 84 (02) :781-807
[3]  
Agrawal R., 1994, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, P487, DOI DOI 10.5555/645920.672836
[4]   MARKOV EQUIVALENCE FOR ANCESTRAL GRAPHS [J].
Ali, R. Ayesha ;
Richardson, Thomas S. ;
Spirtes, Peter .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2009, 37 (5B) :2808-2837
[5]  
Aliferis CF, 2010, J MACH LEARN RES, V11, P171
[6]   Mendelian randomization supports causality between maternal hyperglycemia and epigenetic regulation of leptin gene in newborns [J].
Allard, C. ;
Desgagne, V. ;
Patenaude, J. ;
Lacroix, M. ;
Guillemette, L. ;
Battista, M. C. ;
Doyon, M. ;
Menard, J. ;
Ardilouze, J. L. ;
Perron, P. ;
Bouchard, L. ;
Hivert, M. F. .
EPIGENETICS, 2015, 10 (04) :342-351
[7]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[8]   2-STAGE LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS IN MODELS WITH VARIABLE TREATMENT INTENSITY [J].
ANGRIST, JD ;
IMBENS, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :431-442
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Computation, causation, and discovery
[10]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51