Integrated carbon assessment for sludge-derived concrete: Modelling and a comparative study

被引:6
作者
Huang, Bin [1 ]
Yan, Zhuge [1 ]
Rameezdeen, Rameez [1 ,2 ]
Xing, Ke [1 ]
Huang, Guangtong [1 ]
Liu, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA STEM, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, BJ3-69B,City East Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Alum sludge; Life cycle assessment; Integrated modelling; Carbon neutrality; Low -carbon concrete; Value-added recycling; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RECYCLED CONCRETE; CEMENT INDUSTRY; WATER-TREATMENT; ASH; CO2; POTENTIALS; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140304
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concrete, a cornerstone of modern construction, bears a significant responsibility for global carbon emissions due to its energy-intensive pyroprocessing processes and the direct carbon emissions associated with limestone decomposition. With increasing global of awareness environmental sustainability, the imperative to decarbonise concrete production is becoming evident. Recent research highlights the significance of producing eco-friendly "green" concrete by incorporating treated alum sludge, a by-product of drinking water treatment often discarded in landfills, within the framework of sustainable construction. This research endeavours to develop a comprehensive model for the integrated carbon assessment of sludge-derived concrete products. By conducting scenario and sensitivity analyses, the study explores the decarbonisation potentials and quantifies the impacts of diverse variables on carbon output across the entire lifecycle of concrete products. These variables encompass supply chain dynamics, cement replacement ratio, carbon intensity of local grid mix, and the utilization of alternative fuels. Findings reveal that in comparison to general purpose (GP) cement production, sludge treatment has the potential to achieve an impressive 83.48% reduction in carbon emissions. Moreover, a modest 10% substitution of cement with treated sludge would contribute to 9.07% overall carbon reduction. The transition to full renewable energy consumption holds the potential for a remarkable 41.97% carbon reduction, while the integration of photovoltaic (PV) electricity and biogas heating offers a substantial 30.57% carbon reduction in the manufacturing of sludge-derived concrete. Nonetheless, supply chain alterations demonstrate limited impacts, given the prevalence of locally sourced raw materials and the low embodied carbon contents of transportation-intensive ingredients such as sand and aggregate. Despite discernible progress achieved through cement substitution and renewable energy penetration, full carbon neutrality remains an elusive goal.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[11]   Recycling of sludge from drinking water treatment as ceramic material for the manufacture of tiles [J].
Cremades, L., V ;
Cusido, J. A. ;
Arteaga, F. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 :1071-1080
[12]   A review on alum sludge reuse with special reference to agricultural applications and future challenges [J].
Dassanayake, K. B. ;
Jayasinghe, G. Y. ;
Surapaneni, A. ;
Hetherington, C. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 38 :321-335
[13]  
Galitsky C., 2008, Guidebook for Using the Tool BEST Cement: Benchmarking and Energy Savings Tool for the Cement Industry
[14]   Life cycle assessment of the Spanish cement industry: implementation of environmental-friendly solutions [J].
Garcia-Gusano, Diego ;
Herrera, Israel ;
Garrain, Daniel ;
Lechon, Yolanda ;
Cabal, Helena .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 17 (01) :59-73
[15]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of blended cement concrete including carbonation and durability [J].
Garcia-Segura, Tatiana ;
Yepes, Victor ;
Alcala, Julian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (01) :3-12
[16]  
GCCA, About us
[17]   Prospective life cycle assessment of European cement production [J].
Georgiades, Maria ;
Shah, Izhar Hussain ;
Steubing, Bernhard ;
Cheeseman, Christopher ;
Myers, RupertJ. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 194
[18]   Transportation matters - Does it? GIS-based comparative environmental assessment of concrete mixes with cement, fly ash, natural and recycled aggregates [J].
Goswein, Verena ;
Goncalves, Alexandre B. ;
Silvestre, Jose Dinis ;
Freire, Fausto ;
Habert, Guillaume ;
Kurda, Rawaz .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 137 :1-10
[19]   Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review [J].
Gursel, A. Petek ;
Masanet, Eric ;
Horvath, Arpad ;
Stadel, Alex .
CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2014, 51 :38-48
[20]   Synergic effects of the substitution of Portland cement for water treatment plant sludge ash and ground limestone: Technical and economic evaluation [J].
Hagemann, S. E. ;
Gastaldini, A. L. G. ;
Cocco, M. ;
Jahn, S. L. ;
Terra, L. M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 214 :916-926