Second screening and trust in professional and alternative media: the mediating role of media efficacy

被引:2
作者
Cheng, Zicheng [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yin [1 ,2 ]
Gil de Zuniga, Homero [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Donald P Bellisario Coll Commun, Media Studies Dept, Media Effects Res Lab, Pennsylvania, PA 16801 USA
[2] Univ Salamanca, Coll Law & Publ Adm, Democracy Res Unit, Polit Sci, Salamanca, Spain
[3] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Comunicac & Letras, Ctr Invest Comunicac Literatura & Observac Social, Santiago, Chile
关键词
second screening; social media; media efficacy; professional media trust; alternative media trust; SOCIAL MEDIA; NEWS MEDIA; SELF-EFFICACY; CREDIBILITY; TV; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNICATION; CONSUMPTION; MAINSTREAM; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1093/hcr/hqad053
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In the media convergence landscape, consumption of traditional, well-established media is increasingly combined with newer digital and online platforms such as blogs, podcasts, and social media, which has changed the way news users engage with media content. This study examines the relationship between hybrid media use-specifically, second screening-and trust in both professional and alternative media. Drawing on a two-wave U.S. panel data, first, we find that the second screening positively predicts individuals' belief in the media's ability to help them comprehend complex political matters, known in the literature as media efficacy. Furthermore, second screening is positively associated with alternative media trust but is not significantly related to trust in professional media. However, media efficacy positively mediates the connection between second screening and trust in both alternative and professional media. By delivering valuable information to help the public understand intricate political topics, the second screening promotes news media trust.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 441
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Alternative News Orientation and Trust in Mainstream Media: A Longitudinal Audience Perspective [J].
Andersen, Kim ;
Shehata, Adam ;
Andersson, Dennis .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2023, 11 (05) :833-852
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1973, New models for mass communication research
[3]   A little bit of knowledge: Facebook's News Feed and self-perceptions of knowledge [J].
Anspach, Nicolas M. ;
Jennings, Jay T. ;
Arceneaux, Kevin .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2019, 6 (01)
[4]   The Emerging Viewertariat and BBC Question Time: Television Debate and Real-Time Commenting Online [J].
Anstead, Nick ;
O'Loughlin, Ben .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2011, 16 (04) :440-462
[5]   Effects of Editorial Media Bias Perception and Media Trust on the Use of Traditional, Citizen, and Social Media News [J].
Ardevol-Abreu, Alberto ;
Gil de Zuniga, Homero .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2017, 94 (03) :703-724
[6]  
Arlt D., 2018, Studies in Communication Sciences, V18, DOI [https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2018.02.003, DOI 10.24434/J.SCOMS.2018.02.003]
[7]   The Effect of Streaming Chat on Perceptions of Political Debates [J].
Asbury-Kimmel, Victoria ;
Chang, Keng-Chi ;
McCabe, Katherine T. ;
Munger, Kevin ;
Ventura, Tiago .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2021, 71 (06) :947-975
[8]   Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news [J].
Bucy, EP .
JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2003, 80 (02) :247-264
[9]   Real time political deliberation on social media: can televised debates lead to rational and civil discussions on broadcasters' Facebook pages? [J].
Camaj, Lindita .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2021, 24 (13) :1907-1924
[10]   Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed From Something Blue: Experiments on Dual Viewing TV and Twitter [J].
Cameron, Jaclyn ;
Geidner, Nick .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2014, 58 (03) :400-419