Learning Landscape in Gamification: The Need for a Methodological Protocol in Research Applications

被引:1
作者
Orsoni, Matteo [1 ]
Dube, Adam [2 ]
Prandi, Catia [3 ]
Giovagnoli, Sara [1 ]
Benassi, Mariagrazia [1 ]
Mazzoni, Elvis [1 ]
Benvenuti, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Psychol, Bologna, Italy
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Educ & Counselling Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Bologna, Italy
关键词
application; education; checklist; development; child; gamification in learning; methodological rigor; methodology; scientific; motivation; goals; reward; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; HIGHER-EDUCATION; DESIGN; SYSTEMS; GAMES; SELF;
D O I
10.1177/17456916231202489
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In education, the term "gamification" refers to of the use of game-design elements and gaming experiences in the learning processes to enhance learners' motivation and engagement. Despite researchers' efforts to evaluate the impact of gamification in educational settings, several methodological drawbacks are still present. Indeed, the number of studies with high methodological rigor is reduced and, consequently, so are the reliability of results. In this work, we identified the key concepts explaining the methodological issues in the use of gamification in learning and education, and we exploited the controverses identified in the extant literature. Our final goal was to set up a checklist protocol that will facilitate the design of more rigorous studies in the gamified-learning framework. The checklist suggests potential moderators explaining the link between gamification, learning, and education identified by recent reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses: study design, theory foundations, personalization, motivation and engagement, game elements, game design, and learning outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [11] Brooks R, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P541, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_26
  • [12] Caponetto I, 2014, PROC EUR CONF GAME, P50
  • [13] Caporarello Leonardo, 2019, Organizing for Digital Innovation. At the Interface Between Social Media, Human Behavior and Inclusion. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation (LNISO 27), P179, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-90500-6_14
  • [14] Cavalcanti AP., 2021, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, V2, P100027, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CAEAI.2021.100027, 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027]
  • [15] Cohen J., 1992, Current Directions in Psychological Science, V1, P98, DOI [10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783, DOI 10.1111/1467-8721.EP10768783]
  • [16] Csikszentmihalyi M., 1990, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, DOI [10.2307/258925, DOI 10.2307/258925]
  • [17] de Sousa Borges S., 2014, SAC 14 C, P216, DOI [10.1145/2554850.2554956, DOI 10.1145/2554850.2554956, DOI 10.1145/2554850]
  • [18] The role of learners' characteristics in educational gamification systems: a systematic meta-review of the literature
    Denden, Mouna
    Tlili, Ahmed
    Chen, Nian-Shing
    Abed, Mourad
    Jemni, Mohamed
    Essalmi, Fathi
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (03) : 790 - 812
  • [19] Deterding S., 2011, P 15 INT AC MINDTREK, P9, DOI DOI 10.1145/2181037.2181040
  • [20] Devendren A., 2022, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, V12, P144, DOI [10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i8/14268, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V12-I8/14268]