Resilience assessment of critical infrastructures using dynamic Bayesian networks and evidence propagation

被引:40
作者
Caetano, Henrique O. [1 ]
Desuo, N. Luiz [1 ]
Fogliatto, Matheus S. S. [1 ]
Maciel, Carlos D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo EESC USP, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Dynamic Bayesian networks; Resilience; Critical infrastructures; Evidence propagation; Scenario analysis; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109691
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The proper functioning of critical infrastructures is vital for supporting the economy and social welfare worldwide. Therefore, several methods were developed to assess the resilience of such systems in the face of disruptive events. This work proposes a novel probabilistic approach to the resilience assessment of critical infrastructures using a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) to model resilience curves and cumulative impact in the face of failures. The DBN's structure is based on the physical connections of the system, allowing for a more generalist methodology. Additionally, evidence propagation allows for a scenario-driven approach. Any failure and repair scenario is modelled as evidenced in the DBN, allowing all other nodes' conditional probabilities to be updated accordingly. An Electric Power Distribution System is used to validate the methodology, and results show the ability of the DBN coupled with evidence propagation to assess the resilience of complex systems. Different failure scenarios and restorative actions are considered, resulting in comparative results which can guide decisions and investments in the system.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A RELIABILITY TEST SYSTEM FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES - BASIC DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEM DATA AND RESULTS [J].
ALLAN, RN ;
BILLINTON, R ;
SJARIEF, I ;
GOEL, L ;
SO, KS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1991, 6 (02) :813-820
[2]  
Ankan A, 2015, P 14 PYTH SCI C CIT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems, DOI [10.1016/c2009-0-27609-4, DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-27609-4]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Disaster resilience: A national imperative
[5]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[6]   Resilience evaluation methodology of engineering systems with dynamic-Bayesian-network-based degradation and maintenance [J].
Cai, Baoping ;
Zhang, Yanping ;
Wang, Haifeng ;
Liu, Yonghong ;
Ji, Renjie ;
Gao, Chuntan ;
Kong, Xiangdi ;
Liu, Jing .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 209
[7]   Random Multi Hazard Resilience Modeling of Engineered Systems and Critical Infrastructure [J].
Cheng, Yao ;
Elsayed, E. A. ;
Chen, Xi .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 209
[8]  
Dagum P, 2013, Dynamic network models for forecasting
[9]   Power distribution system interruption duration model using reliability [J].
Fogliatto, M. S. S. ;
Caetano, H. O. ;
Desuo N, L. ;
Massignan, J. A. D. ;
Fanucchi, R. Z. ;
London, J. B. A. ;
Pereira, B. R. ;
Bessani, M. ;
Maciel, C. D. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2022, 211
[10]   Studying Well and Performing Well: A Bayesian Analysis on Team and Individual Rowing Performance in Dual Career Athletes [J].
Gavala-Gonzalez, Juan ;
Martins, Bruno ;
Ponseti, Francisco Javier ;
Garcia-Mas, Alexandre .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11