Patent law harmonization and international trade

被引:0
作者
Ito, Banri [1 ,2 ]
Shirai, Katsunori [3 ]
机构
[1] Aoyama Gakuin Univ, Coll Econ, 4-4-25 Shibuya,Shibuya Ku, Tokyo 1508366, Japan
[2] Res Inst Econ Trade & Ind RIETI, 1-3-1,Kasumigaseki,Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1008901, Japan
[3] Osaka Gakuin Univ, Fac Econ, 2-36-1 Kishibe Minami, Suita, Osaka 5648511, Japan
关键词
Intellectual property rights; Patent law; Gravity model; Bilateral trade; F14; F15; O34; TECHNOLOGY; PROTECTION; VARIETY; GRAVITY; RIGHTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s42495-022-00103-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Global harmonization of intellectual property rights (IPR) system is one of the major challenges in multilateral or regional trade negotiations. It remains even unclear as to whether the harmonization of the IPR system spurs international trade. The present study argues that institutional harmonization in terms of knowledge production plays an important role in trade of patent-sensitive goods, considering the fact that trade in patent-sensitive goods is heavily concentrated in trade between developed countries. This study empirically examines the relationship between harmonization of patent rights systems and international trade flow based on world bilateral trade data during 1995-2010. Differently to methods of previous studies on this topic, this study uses a structural gravity model based on a translog demand system that is more flexible than constant elasticity of substitution type preferences. The results reveal that institutional distance in terms of patent law has an inverted U-shaped relationship with bilateral trade share in patent-sensitive industries, suggesting similarity in patent systems of exporters and importers raises bilateral trade. This result is robust to the model with additional variables that affect trade costs.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 306
页数:18
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[2]   Does Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Protection Induce More Bilateral Trade? Evidence from China's Imports [J].
Awokuse, Titus O. ;
Yin, Hong .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 38 (08) :1094-1104
[4]   Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade [J].
Chaney, Thomas .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (04) :1707-1721
[5]  
Co Catherine., 2004, Review of International Economics, V12, P359, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00455.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9396.2004.00455.X]
[6]  
Cohen M, 2000, Working Paper No. 7552
[7]   The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns [J].
de Groot, HLF ;
Linders, GJ ;
Rietveld, P ;
Subramanian, U .
KYKLOS, 2004, 57 (01) :103-123
[8]  
Diewert W.E., 1976, J ECONOMETRICS, V4, P114, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(76)90009-9, 10.1016/0304-4076(76)90009-9]
[9]   Technology, geography, and trade [J].
Eaton, J ;
Kortum, S .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (05) :1741-1779
[10]   A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, without constant price elasticity [J].
Feenstra, RC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 78 (01) :79-86