Generalized response displacement methods for seismic analysis of underground structures with complex cross section

被引:1
作者
Xu, Zigang [1 ]
Ding, Linling [1 ]
Du, Xiuli [2 ]
Xu, Chengshun [2 ]
Zhuang, Haiyang [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Jiaotong Univ, Jiangxi Key Lab Infrastruct Safety Control Geotec, Nanchang 330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
underground structures; seismic analysis; response displacement method; equivalent seismic load; complex cross section; EARTHQUAKE; ELEMENT; TUNNELS; DAMAGE; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11803-023-2211-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The response displacement method (RDM) is recommended for the seismic analysis of underground structures in the transverse direction for many codes, including bases for design of structures-seismic actions for designing geotechnical works (ISO 23469) and code for seismic design of urban rail transit structures (GB 50909-2014). However, there are some obvious limitations in the application of RDM. Springs and the shear stress of the soil could be approximately evaluated for the structures having a simple cross section, such as rectangular and circular structures. It is necessary to propose simplified seismic analysis methods for structures with complex cross sections. This paper refers to the idea of RDM and proposes three generalized response displacement methods (GRDM). In GRDM1, a part of the soil surrounding a structure is selected to generate a generalized underground structure with a rectangular cross section, and the same analysis model as RDM is applied to analyze the responses of the structure. In GRDM2, a hollow soil model without a generalized structure is used to compute the equivalent load caused by the relative displacement of the soil, and the soil-structure interaction model is applied to calculate the responses of the structure. In GRDM3, a continuous soil model is applied to compute the equivalent load caused by the relative displacement and shear stress of the soil, and the soil-structure interaction model is applied to analyze the responses of the structure, which is the same as the model used in GRDM2. The time-history analysis method (THAM) is used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed simplified methods. Results show that the error of GRDM1 is about 20%, while the error is only 5% for GRDM2 and GRDM3. Among the three proposed methods, GRDM3 has obvious advantages regarding calculation efficiency and accuracy. Therefore, it is recommended to use GRDM3 for the seismic response analysis of underground structures that have conventional simple or complex cross sections.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 993
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Experimental and numerical investigations of the effect of buried box culverts on earthquake excitation [J].
Abuhajar, Osama ;
El Naggar, Hesham ;
Newson, Tim .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2015, 79 :130-148
[2]  
Bardet J.P., 2000, EERA COMPUTER PROGRA
[3]   Structural health monitoring of underground facilities - Technological issues and challenges [J].
Bhalla, S ;
Yang, YW ;
Zhao, J ;
Soh, CK .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 20 (05) :487-500
[5]   Shaking table test on the seismic failure characteristics of a subway station structure on liquefiable ground [J].
Chen, Guoxing ;
Wang, Zhihua ;
Zuo, Xi ;
Du, Xiuli ;
Gao, Hongmei .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (10) :1489-1507
[6]   Dynamic centrifuge tests on isolation mechanism of tunnels subjected to seismic shaking [J].
Chen, Z. Y. ;
Shen, H. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 42 :67-77
[7]  
Choi JS, 2002, 15 ASCE ENG MECH C N, P1
[8]  
Cilingir U, 2011, SOILS FOUND, V51, P449
[9]   Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels [J].
Cilingir, Ulas ;
Madabhushi, S. P. Gopal .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (01) :117-127
[10]   Numerical simulation for large-scale seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel [J].
Ding, Jun-Hong ;
Jin, Xian-Long ;
Guo, Yi-Zhi ;
Li, Gen-Guo .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2006, 28 (10) :1367-1377