Classification of suicidality by training supervised machine learning models with brain MRI findings: A systematic review

被引:11
|
作者
Parsaei, Mohammadamin [1 ]
Taghavizanjani, Fateme [1 ]
Cattarinussi, Giulia [2 ,3 ]
Moghaddam, Hossein Sanjari [1 ,4 ]
Di Camillo, Fabio [2 ]
Akhondzadeh, Shahin [4 ]
Sambataro, Fabio [2 ,3 ]
Brambilla, Paolo [5 ,6 ]
Delvecchio, Giuseppe [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Neurosci DNS, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Padua, Padova Neurosci Ctr, Padua, Italy
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Roozbeh Hosp, Psychiat & Psychol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[6] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Dept Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Via F Sforza 35, I-20122 Milan, Italy
关键词
Suicide; Machine learning; Supervised learning; Artificial intelligence; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRI; MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; RISK; ABNORMALITIES; ATTEMPTERS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.034
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Suicide is a global public health issue causing around 700,000 deaths worldwide each year. Therefore, identifying suicidal thoughts and behaviors in patients can help lower the suicide-related mortality rate. This review aimed to investigate the feasibility of suicidality identification by applying supervised Machine Learning (ML) methods to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data.Methods: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies examining suicidality by applying ML methods to MRI features. Also, the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was employed for the quality assessment.Results: 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 developed prediction models without external validation and 3 developed prediction models with external validation. The performance of ML models varied among the reviewed studies, with the highest reported values of accuracies and Area Under the Curve (AUC) ranging from 51.7 % to 100 % and 0.52 to 1, respectively. Over half of the studies that reported accuracy (12/21) or AUC (13/16) achieved values of & GE;0.8. Our comparative analysis indicated that deep learning exhibited the highest predictive performance compared to other ML models. The most commonly identified discriminative imaging features were resting-state functional connectivity and grey matter volume within prefrontal-limbic structures.Limitations: Small sample sizes, lack of external validation, heterogeneous study designs, and ML model development. Conclusions: Most of the studies developed ML models capable of ML-based suicide identification, although ML models' predictive performance varied across the reviewed studies. Thus, further well-designed is necessary to uncover the true potential of different ML models in this field.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 791
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine Learning for Brain MRI Data Harmonisation: A Systematic Review
    Wen, Grace
    Shim, Vickie
    Holdsworth, Samantha Jane
    Fernandez, Justin
    Qiao, Miao
    Kasabov, Nikola
    Wang, Alan
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (04):
  • [2] Machine learning models for predicting preeclampsia: a systematic review
    Ranjbar, Amene
    Montazeri, Farideh
    Ghamsari, Sepideh Rezaei
    Mehrnoush, Vahid
    Roozbeh, Nasibeh
    Darsareh, Fatemeh
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] Explainable Machine Learning Models for Brain Diseases: Insights from a Systematic Review
    Mallma, Mirko Jerber Rodriguez
    Zuloaga-Rotta, Luis
    Borja-Rosales, Ruben
    Mallma, Josef Renato Rodriguez
    Vilca-Aguilar, Marcos
    Salas-Ojeda, Maria
    Mauricio, David
    NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 16 (06): : 1285 - 1307
  • [4] Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques
    Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Peloponnese, End of Karaiskaki, 22100 , Tripolis GR, Greece
    Inf, 2007, 3 (249-268):
  • [5] Application of machine learning classification for structural brain MRI in mood disorders: Critical review from a clinical perspective
    Kim, Yong-Ku
    Na, Kyoung-Sae
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 80 : 71 - 80
  • [6] A systematic review of machine learning findings in PTSD and their relationships with theoretical models
    Blekic, Wivine
    D'Hondt, Fabien
    Shalev, Arieh Y.
    Schultebraucks, Katharina
    NATURE MENTAL HEALTH, 2025, : 139 - 158
  • [7] Application of Machine Learning for Classification of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Santana, Lais Silva
    Diniz, Jordana Borges Camargo
    Gasparri, Luisa Mothe Glioche
    Canto, Alessandra Buccaran
    dos Reis, Savio Batista
    Ribeiro, Iuri Santana Neville
    Figueiredo, Eberval Gadelha
    Telles, Joaeo Paulo Mota
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 186 : 204 - 218.e2
  • [8] Performance Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Classification of Alzheimer's Disease from Brain MRI
    Thayumanasamy, Illakiya
    Ramamurthy, Karthik
    TRAITEMENT DU SIGNAL, 2022, 39 (06) : 1961 - 1970
  • [9] Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI: A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications
    Castillo T., Jose M.
    Arif, Muhammad
    Niessen, Wiro J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Veenland, Jifke F.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Supervised machine learning-based classification scheme to segment the brainstem on MRI in multicenter brain tumor treatment context
    Jose Dolz
    Anne Laprie
    Soléakhéna Ken
    Henri-Arthur Leroy
    Nicolas Reyns
    Laurent Massoptier
    Maximilien Vermandel
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11 : 43 - 51