Wealth Dynamics Over Generations: Analysis and Interventions

被引:2
作者
Acharya, Krishna [1 ]
Arunachaleswaran, Eshwar Ram [2 ]
Kannan, Sampath [2 ]
Roth, Aaron [2 ]
Ziani, Juba [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA USA
来源
2023 IEEE CONFERENCE ON SECURE AND TRUSTWORTHY MACHINE LEARNING, SATML | 2023年
关键词
Wealth Dynamics; Feedback Loops; College Admissions; Fairness; Interventions for Fairness;
D O I
10.1109/SaTML54575.2023.00013
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present a stylized model with feedback loops for the evolution of a population's wealth over generations. Individuals have both talent and wealth: talent is a random variable distributed identically for everyone, but wealth is a random variable that is dependent on the population one is born into. Individuals then apply to a downstream agent, which we treat as a university throughout the paper (but could also represent an employer) who makes a decision about whether to admit them or not. The university does not directly observe talent or wealth, but rather a signal (representing e.g. a standardized test) that is a convex combination of both. The university knows the distributions from which an individual's type and wealth are drawn, and makes its decisions based on the posterior distribution of the applicant's characteristics conditional on their population and signal. Each population's wealth distribution at the next round then depends on the fraction of that population that was admitted by the university at the previous round. We study wealth dynamics in this model, and give conditions under which the dynamics have a single attracting fixed point (which implies population wealth inequality is transitory), and conditions under which it can have multiple attracting fixed points (which implies that population wealth inequality can be persistent). In the case in which there are multiple attracting fixed points, we study interventions aimed at eliminating or mitigating inequality, including increasing the capacity of the university to admit more people, aligning the signal generated by individuals with the preferences of the university, and making direct monetary transfers to the less wealthy population.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 57
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Arrow K., 1973, DISCRIMINATION LABOR, P3, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400867066-003
[2]   Distortion and risk in optimal incentive contracts [J].
Baker, G .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2002, 37 (04) :728-751
[3]  
COATE S, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P1220
[4]  
Foster V., 1992, RATION SOC, V4, P176, DOI DOI 10.1177/1043463192004002004
[5]   Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility [J].
Heidari, Hoda ;
Kleinberg, Jon .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, :15-25
[6]   A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market [J].
Hu, Lily ;
Chen, Yiling .
WEB CONFERENCE 2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW2018), 2018, :1389-1398
[7]  
Jabbari S, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
[8]  
Jung Christopher, 2020, EC '20: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, P677, DOI 10.1145/3391403.3399473
[9]   Downstream Effects of Affirmative Action [J].
Kannan, Sampath ;
Roth, Aaron ;
Ziani, Juba .
FAT*'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, 2019, :240-248
[10]  
Liu LT, 2018, PR MACH LEARN RES, V80