Harmonizing DSM-IV and DSM-5 Versions of ADHD "A Criteria": An Item Response Theory Analysis

被引:5
作者
Coxe, Stefany [1 ]
Sibley, Margaret H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
ADHD; DSM; harmonized measure; item response theory (IRT); integrative data analysis (IDA); PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; TEACHER RATINGS; ODD SYMPTOMS; PARENT; ADOLESCENTS; DISORDER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/10731911211061299
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The transition from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; DSM-IV-TR) to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) checklists included item wording changes that require psychometric validation. A large sample of 854 adolescents across four randomized trials of psychosocial ADHD treatments was used to evaluate the comparability of the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 versions of the ADHD symptom checklist. Item response theory (IRT) was used to evaluate item characteristics and determine differences across versions and studies. Item characteristics varied across items. No consistent differences in item characteristics were found across versions. Some differences emerged between studies. IRT models were used to create continuous, harmonized scores that take item, study, and version differences into account and are therefore comparable. DSM-IV-TR ADHD checklists will generalize to the DSM-5 era. Researchers should consider using modern measurement methods (such as IRT) to better understand items and create continuous variables that better reflect the variability in their samples.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 617
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, CONNERS 3 EDITION CO
  • [3] Asparouhov T., 2016, IRT in Mplus. Version 2
  • [4] A More General Model for Testing Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning
    Bauer, Daniel J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2017, 22 (03) : 507 - 526
  • [5] Pooling data from multiple longitudinal studies: The role of item response theory in integrative data analysis
    Curran, Patrick J.
    Hussong, Andrea M.
    Cai, Li
    Huang, Wenjing
    Sher, Kenneth J.
    Chassin, Laurie
    Zucker, Robert A.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (02) : 365 - 380
  • [6] A Moderated Nonlinear Factor Model for the Development of Commensurate Measures in Integrative Data Analysis
    Curran, Patrick J.
    McGinley, James S.
    Bauer, Daniel J.
    Hussong, Andrea M.
    Burns, Alison
    Chassin, Laurie
    Sher, Kenneth
    Zucker, Robert
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2014, 49 (03) : 214 - 231
  • [7] Integrative Data Analysis: The Simultaneous Analysis of Multiple Data Sets
    Curran, Patrick J.
    Hussong, Andrea M.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2009, 14 (02) : 81 - 100
  • [8] Collapsing Categories is Often More Advantageous than Modeling Sparse Data: Investigations in the CFA Framework
    DiStefano, Christine
    Shi, Dexin
    Morgan, Grant B.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (02) : 237 - 249
  • [9] Parent and Teacher Ratings of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: Factor Structure and Normative Data
    DuPaul, George J.
    Reid, Robert
    Anastopoulos, Arthur D.
    Lambert, Matthew C.
    Watkins, Marley W.
    Power, Thomas J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 28 (02) : 214 - 225
  • [10] DuPaul GJ, 1998, ADHD RATING SCALE 4, Vviii