Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Maribavir in Patients with Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease that are Refractory or Resistant to Conventional Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Marcellusi, Andrea [1 ]
Bini, Chiara [1 ]
Corinti, Simone [2 ]
Fioravanti, Laura [2 ]
Vedova, Laura Dalla [2 ]
Amorosi, Stacey L. [3 ]
De Lacey, Tam [4 ]
Chowdhury, Emtiyaz [4 ]
Mennini, Francesco Saverio [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Fac Econ, Econ Evaluat & HTA CEIS EEHTA, IGF Dept, Rome, Italy
[2] Takeda Italia Spa Rome, Rome, Italy
[3] Takeda Pharmaceut USA Inc, Lexington, VA USA
[4] Parexel Int, HEOR Modeling, London, England
[5] Kingston Univ London, Inst Leadership & Management Hlth, London, England
关键词
Cytomegalovirus; Maribavir; Cost-effectiveness; Transplant; STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; HEALTH-STATE UTILITIES; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GANCICLOVIR-RESISTANT; PREEMPTIVE THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; PROPHYLAXIS; PREVENTION; RECIPIENTS;
D O I
10.7175/fe.v24i1.1548
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a serious post-transplantation complication, particularly among transplant recipients with resistant or refractory (R/R) infection. Despite the improvement made in CMV prevention and treatment, remains a need for new therapies that are better tolerated and safer for patients, especially for refractory or resistant (R/R) infections. This analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT) for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV in the Italian context. METHODS: The analysis was conducted from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective using a Markov model previously developed in Excel((R)) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus IAT for the treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV. Health event rates and transition probabilities were informed by data from observational studies and from SOLSTICE clinical trial, which compared maribavir to conventional antiviral treatments for transplant patients with R/R CMV infections. Utilities were from SOLSTICE and a utility vignette study. Costs inputs were derived from published literature and Italian national tariffs for outpatient and hospital services. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3%. RESULTS: Maribavir compared to the IAT used for the treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV achieved an incremental cost of (sic) 11,455 for an incremental quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.313. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of (sic) 36,626/QALY, for maribavir compared to IAT, which is below the generally accepted, national willingness-to-pay threshold for orphan drugs ((sic) 37,000/QALY). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that maribavir, an orphan drug treatment, is cost-effective compared to the current antiviral treatments used for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 41
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in patients with AIDS: Oral ganciclovir and CMV polymerase chain reaction testing
    Rose, DN
    Sacks, HS
    AIDS, 1997, 11 (07) : 883 - 887
  • [22] Prophylaxis for disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection in patients with AIDS: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Freedberg, KA
    Cohen, CJ
    Barber, TW
    JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES AND HUMAN RETROVIROLOGY, 1997, 15 (04): : 275 - 282
  • [23] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Japan
    Kawamoto, Yukiyoshi
    Mouri, Mitsuko
    Taira, Takaomi
    Iseki, Hiroshi
    Masamune, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 89 : 628 - +
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness analysis of enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of Chinese patients with fabry disease: a Markov model
    Huang, Yueyang
    Yuan, Hongmei
    Huang, Zhe
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [25] Latanoprost versus timolol as first choice therapy in patients with ocular hypertension A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Peeters, Andrea
    Schouten, Jan S. A. G.
    Severens, Johan L.
    Hendrikse, Fred
    Prins, Martin H.
    Webers, Carroll A. B.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2012, 90 (02) : 146 - 154
  • [26] The optimal timing of hepatitis C therapy in liver transplant-eligible patients: Cost-effectiveness analysis of new opportunities
    Cortesi, P. A.
    Belli, L. S.
    Facchetti, R.
    Mazzarelli, C.
    Perricone, G.
    De Nicola, S.
    Cesana, G.
    Duvoux, C.
    Mantovani, L. G.
    Strazzabosco, M.
    JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS, 2018, 25 (07) : 791 - 801
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in post-renal transplantation maintenance therapy in adult patients in Brazil
    Acurcio, Francisco de Assis
    Mattana Saturnino, Luciana Tarbes
    da Silva, Anderson Lourenco
    Araujo de Oliveira, Gustavo Laine
    Gurgel Andrade, Eli Iola
    Cherchiglia, Mariangela Leal
    Braga Ceccato, Maria das Gracas
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2013, 29 : S92 - S109
  • [28] Economic impact of combination therapy with infliximab plus azathioprine for drug-refractory Crohn's disease: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Saito, Shota
    Shimizu, Utako
    Nan, Zhang
    Mandai, Nozomu
    Yokoyama, Junji
    Terajima, Kenshi
    Akazawa, Kouhei
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2013, 7 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [29] The cost-effectiveness of primary prophylactic implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart disease: a European analysis
    Smith, Tim
    Jordaens, Luc
    Theuns, Dominic A. M. J.
    van Dessel, Pascal F.
    Wilde, Arthur A.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (03) : 211 - 219
  • [30] A cost-effectiveness analysis of n-3 PUFA (Omacor®) treatment in post-MI patients
    Quilici, S.
    Martin, M.
    McGuire, A.
    Zoellner, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (08) : 922 - 932