Dual-Process Theory of Thought and Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis

被引:1
作者
Gronchi, Giorgio [1 ]
Gavazzi, Gioele [1 ]
Viggiano, Maria Pia [1 ]
Giovannelli, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Dept Neurosci Psychol Drug Res & Childs Hlth NEURO, I-50135 Florence, Italy
关键词
dual process; meta-analysis; left inferior frontal gyrus; insula; pre-SMA; DMN; PARCS theory; COGNITIVE REFLECTION TEST; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; BELIEF-BIAS; ERP COMPONENTS; CONFLICT; ACTIVATION; TASKS; FMRI; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3390/brainsci14010101
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The dual-process theory of thought rests on the co-existence of two different thinking modalities: a quick, automatic, and associative process opposed to a slow, thoughtful, and deliberative process. The increasing interest in determining the neural foundation of the dual-process distinction has yielded mixed results, also given the difficulty of applying the fMRI standard approach to tasks usually employed in the cognitive literature. We report an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to investigate the neural foundation of the dual-process theory of thought. Eligible studies allowed for the identification of cerebral areas associated with dual-process theory-based tasks without differentiating between fast and slow thinking. The ALE algorithm converged on the medial frontal cortex, superior frontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and left inferior frontal gyrus. These structures partially overlap with the cerebral areas recurrently reported in the literature about the neural basis of the dual-process distinction, where the PARCS theory-based interpretation emphasizes the role of the right inferior gyrus. The results confirm the potential (but still almost unexplored) common ground between the dual-process literature and the cognitive control literature.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses [J].
Aron, Adam R. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 69 (12) :E55-E68
[2]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[3]  
Attali Y, 2020, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V15, P93
[4]   Two Kinds of Process or Two Kinds of Processing? Disambiguating Dual-Process Theories [J].
Augusto, Rafael .
REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15 (01) :277-298
[5]   The relation between different types of religiosity and analytic cognitive style [J].
Bahcekapili, Hasan G. ;
Yilmaz, Onurcan .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 117 :267-272
[6]  
Ball LindenJ., 2018, Dual Process Theory 2.0, P100, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315204550-7
[7]  
Banks AdrianP., 2018, Dual Process Theory 2.0, P66
[8]   Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control [J].
Bari, Andrea ;
Robbins, Trevor W. .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 108 :44-79
[9]   Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? [J].
Baron, Jonathan ;
Scott, Sydney ;
Fincher, Katrina ;
Metz, S. Emlen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 4 (03) :265-284
[10]   Separate encoding of model-based and model-free valuations in the human brain [J].
Beierholm, Ulrik R. ;
Anen, Cedric ;
Quartz, Steven ;
Bossaerts, Peter .
NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 58 (03) :955-962